Turion ML-32 vs T2300

[MAME]

Is there anywhere that compares these CPU's? Trying to find where one performs better but it's hard to find anything other than tech specs on them.


Thanks

 

[kknd1967]

signle core in ML-32 vs dual-core in T2300
no need to compare. T2300 wins as Core Duo should even win dual-core Turion X2 in most of the benchmarks on a clock-2-clock basis.

Originally posted by: MAME
Is there anywhere that compares these CPU's? Trying to find where one performs better but it's hard to find anything other than tech specs on them.


Thanks

 

[MAME]

Originally posted by: kknd1967
signle core in ML-32 vs dual-core in T2300
no need to compare. T2300 wins as Core Duo should even win dual-core Turion X2 in most of the benchmarks on a clock-2-clock basis.

Originally posted by: MAME
Is there anywhere that compares these CPU's? Trying to find where one performs better but it's hard to find anything other than tech specs on them.


Thanks

Just because it's dual core doesn't mean it performs better. This is why I'm looking for comparisons between these chips (or different clock speeds of the same cores).

Are there any reviews out there?

 

[firewolfsm]

The core duo will be faster, an X2 is similar to a core duo, so a single core based off X2 will be slower.

 

[ahock]

Well I beg to disagree that X2 is at par with core duo.... Few sites already released benchmarks which shows core duo beats X2 handily. Honestly my guess is that if AMD is so confident about Turion X2 then they have somehow seeded parts to reputable sites for benchmarks and release their NDA when they release the part similar to what they did Opteron Athlon X2 etc etc.

 

[kknd1967]

Core Solo/Duo is an improved P-M architecture. Since P-M is pretty much equal to Turion, you can expect Core Solo/Cuo will be faster than Turion in most benchs.
Not all the bench below are multi-thread. So you can see Core Duo will be faster not only in multi-thread scenarios.

review 1
Review 2

Originally posted by: MAME

Originally posted by: kknd1967
signle core in ML-32 vs dual-core in T2300
no need to compare. T2300 wins as Core Duo should even win dual-core Turion X2 in most of the benchmarks on a clock-2-clock basis.

Originally posted by: MAME
Is there anywhere that compares these CPU's? Trying to find where one performs better but it's hard to find anything other than tech specs on them.


Thanks

Just because it's dual core doesn't mean it performs better. This is why I'm looking for comparisons between these chips (or different clock speeds of the same cores).

Are there any reviews out there?

 

[kknd1967]

I think firewolfsm means desktop A64 X2, which is quite reasonable

Originally posted by: ahock
Well I beg to disagree that X2 is at par with core duo.... Few sites already released benchmarks which shows core duo beats X2 handily. Honestly my guess is that if AMD is so confident about Turion X2 then they have somehow seeded parts to reputable sites for benchmarks and release their NDA when they release the part similar to what they did Opteron Athlon X2 etc etc.

 

[firewolfsm]

Actually, the Core Duo performed slightly worse clock for clock in single threaded programs, it wasn't enough to matter, they're basically the same.