Tualatin Celeron & BX vs. P3-1Ghz & 815

lepton

Junior Member
Feb 11, 2002
7
0
0
Maybe someone can help me. I can upgrade an Asus cusl2 (815e) to P3-1000. Or an Abit bx6-II to Celeron 1200.
I know that on the same M.B the Celeron will be quicker. But in my case the BX is UDMA-33 and AGP*2. And the 815e is UDMA-66 and AGP*4. So what's the best?

P.S.

P3-1000 is vanishing as we speak....
 

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,131
3,690
136
Unless you are using that new Powerleap adapter especially configured for Tualatin processors, you CANNOT use a Celeron 1200 on a bx6. The Celeron 1200 is a Tualatin core.
Now your decision is easy!
 

MrMaster

Golden Member
Nov 16, 2001
1,235
2
76
www.pc-prime.com
Gotta agree. I bought a Celeron 1 gig Tualatin and a Slocket III(thought it was III) adapter for my bx motherboard.

No go. So I am going to dish out the $50 for an ECS P6S5AT motherboard instead. I want to still use my pc100 memory.
 

boyRacer

Lifer
Oct 1, 2001
18,569
0
0
BX memory bandwidth will always be a little better than the 815 when clocked to 133... so i say you get the Powerleap... $160 i believe for the CPU and slot?... not sure. AGP 4x doesnt give a night and day difference against AGP 2x.
 

bacillus

Lifer
Jan 6, 2001
14,517
0
71


<< I can upgrade an Asus cusl2 (815e) to P3-1000 >>


if you can get hold of a 100fsb p3 1GHz cpu then hopefully you'll be able to o/clock it to 124 or even 133fsb.
 

lepton

Junior Member
Feb 11, 2002
7
0
0
Maybe I wasn't clear enough, I can by Celeron 1200 with the Powerleap converter.
The Celeron is faster than the P3. But the BX has AGP*2 compare to AGP*4 and UDMA*33 compare to UDMA*66. So what?s the best?
 

oldfart

Lifer
Dec 2, 1999
10,207
0
0
Remember, C1.2 on a BX is 100 FSB. PIIIEB on a CUSL2 is 133 FSB. Bus speed also comes into play for overall performance. I'm not a big fan of the Powerleap setups. Some people get them to work, some don't. Support is supposed to be pretty bad as well. You could buy a decent 815E mobo, a C1.0A and easily overclock it to 133+ FSB, 1.33+ GHz for the cost of a Powerleap setup. If you sel the old mobo, it will cost you less in the end for a better setup.
 

lepton

Junior Member
Feb 11, 2002
7
0
0
If you'll look at: http://www.xbitlabs.com/cpu/celeron-1200/
you'll see that the Celeron is stronger (with the same rig). the question is how it is when comparing Celeron + BX vs P3 + 815e.
You can see in the link that old Celeron 1000 overclocked to 1330Mhz won't win the new one at 1200Mhz
 

oldfart

Lifer
Dec 2, 1999
10,207
0
0
That xbit test was an unlocked CPU. So yes, a Tualatin Celeron @ same CPU and same bus speed is faster than a Coppermine, but that is not what you are doing. The Celeron 1.0A I was talking about is the new Tualatin version, not the Coppermine.
 

lepton

Junior Member
Feb 11, 2002
7
0
0
Sorry oldfart, I don?t understand you, you?re saying there is a Tualatin 1000 Celeron (never saw one) that I can put on my 815 without a converter and overclock it to 1333?
 

oldfart

Lifer
Dec 2, 1999
10,207
0
0


<< Sorry oldfart, I don?t understand you, you?re saying there is a Tualatin 1000 Celeron (never saw one) that I can put on my 815 without a converter and overclock it to 1333? >>


Yes, there is a Tualatin Celeron 1000. Tualatin Celerons come in 1.0A, 1.1A, 1.2 and 1.3 versions. The 1.0A version will easily go to 133 FSB, 1.33 GHz. Its $73 box retail @ Newegg.com. . As you know, they wont work in a CUSL2 though. You need a Tually capable mobo. My point about the Powerleap is they get ~ $70 for the slot1 adapter. You can get a proper 815E mobo for ~ $20 -$ 30 more. Sell the extra mobo and it wont cost you any extra. I just dont see a good reason to use one. The C1.0A @ 1.33 GHz will be faster than either of the other setups you are considering.