Trumps northeast Blitzkrieg

[crashtech]

Show more restraint in exercising military power than the Neocons?

Guess you missed the fact that Hillary is a neocon in all but name, which is why traitorous neocons from the R side are supporting her.

 

[kage69]

I'm a Bernie supporter. If you think Hillary is anywhere near as bad as Cruz or Trump you are sick in the head. Get your shit together. 99% of the things you think are bad about Hillary are GOP fabrications.

Excuse me?

If you think I've said either is better than Hillary, you need to learn to read as well as keep that advice packed up your ass where you got it. My concerns about Hillary are hardly GOP fabrications, and if you've read any of my posts regarding Benghazi, etc, you'd know making fun of GOP talking points is something I enjoy, often.

So no, how about you get your shit together? Or do I need to link some of my own posts to make it clear? You speak for yourself, I'll do the same.

 

[dank69]

Excuse me?

If you think I've said either is better than Hillary, you need to learn to read as well as keep that advice packed up your ass where you got it. My concerns about Hillary are hardly GOP fabrications, and if you've read any of my posts regarding Benghazi, etc, you'd know making fun of GOP talking points is something I enjoy, often.

So no, how about you get your shit together? Or do I need to link some of my own posts to make it clear? You speak for yourself, I'll do the same.

You said you'd prefer to stay home rather than vote Clinton. Sorry, that means your head is planted firmly up your ass. I'd prefer Bernie, but there is nothing, NOTHING, that disqualifies Hillary or makes me think I am "compromising my principles" by voting for her come November. That is asinine. The only people claiming such nonsense have had their head filled with GOP propaganda for the past 25 years. I know you aren't a conservative. I know you know that the shit coming from right wing media is almost complete lies. Why then do you believe the stories about Hillary when they originate from that fucking cesspool? Because they tell you what you want to hear about Hillary?

 

[Jhhnn]

Guess you missed the fact that Hillary is a neocon in all but name, which is why traitorous neocons from the R side are supporting her.

Do you often substitute opinion for fact? If so, you might have been brainwashed.

 

[compuwiz1]

deleted - wrong thread

 

[crashtech]

Do you often substitute opinion for fact? If so, you might have been brainwashed.

Have you ever heard of psychological projection? It's often the source of much unnecessary unpleasantness, some deep introspection might be good for you!

http://www.salon.com/2016/03/04/cor...n_nightmare_scenario_backing_hillary_clinton/

http://inthesetimes.com/article/189...-clinton-over-donald-trump.-no-surprisetheyve

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/trump-clinton-neoconservatives-220151

http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/03/28/hillary-clinton-neocon/

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/06/o...tting-ready-to-ally-with-hillary-clinton.html

That's just the tip of the iceberg! It's not like some secret, or something I just made up to smear your candidate. If you like interventionist policy, she's a decent pick.

 

[kage69]

You said you'd prefer to stay home rather than vote Clinton.

Interesting. Link? I can't for the life of me remember ever saying I'd stay home on election day. With the exception of being busy in Korea once in 2004, I've voted in all of the elections since I was eligible.

Sorry, that means your head is planted firmly up your ass. I'd prefer Bernie, but there is nothing, NOTHING, that disqualifies Hillary or makes me think I am "compromising my principles" by voting for her come November. That is asinine. The only people claiming such nonsense have had their head filled with GOP propaganda for the past 25 years. I know you aren't a conservative. I know you know that the shit coming from right wing media is almost complete lies. Why then do you believe the stories about Hillary when they originate from that fucking cesspool? Because they tell you what you want to hear about Hillary?

Ok, I'm not going to indulge your sanctimonious prick routine any longer; a choice to not vote for someone who has proven themselves dishonest and corrupt simply means I place principles higher than short term victory. I alluded to this earlier but you seem intent on ignoring it. Whatever. If you don't see Hillary's negatives as a conflict of interest for what she says, that's your choice. If you don't agree with my initial post, that's fine too, but I have a problem with you putting words in my mouth. Got a problem with something I posted? Quote it, but keep your assumptions to yourself. I'd also appreciate you keeping a hold on some context - you'll notice I was talking about non-GOP voters to begin with, not myself.

I'm not sure what "stories" you are referring to because you haven't specified, but I suspect my mention of the FBI is what hit a nerve. I think this is where you get to show that the State Department and the FBI are lying about the investigation, or at least part of the right wing media and the cesspool it maintains. Now might also be a good time to point out I haven't passed judgement on this email issue, and just want to the FBI to hurry up and "let the cards fall as they may." Quit acting like this is wishful thinking from Fox and Friends, the FBI doesn't put a dozen guys on something unless they have a good reason - even a critic of the FBI like me knows that.

If she is as innocent as you and others proclaim, then you have nothing to worry about and shouldn't let my desire for the FBI to get on with it make you stoop to such accusatory bullshit.

 

[Jhhnn]

Have you ever heard of psychological projection? It's often the source of much unnecessary unpleasantness, some deep introspection might be good for you!

http://www.salon.com/2016/03/04/cor...n_nightmare_scenario_backing_hillary_clinton/

http://inthesetimes.com/article/189...-clinton-over-donald-trump.-no-surprisetheyve

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/trump-clinton-neoconservatives-220151

http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/03/28/hillary-clinton-neocon/

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/06/o...tting-ready-to-ally-with-hillary-clinton.html

That's just the tip of the iceberg! It's not like some secret, or something I just made up to smear your candidate. If you like interventionist policy, she's a decent pick.

So, wait... you link opinion pieces to substantiate an assertion of fact?

4 out of 5 are just rehashes of the others.

There is a difference, don't you think, between our usual meddling & air support vs full scale invasions at enormous expense & loss of American life?

Yeh, there is a real difference & I have trouble seeing Hillary whipping up an invasion frenzy out of thin air like the Bushistas accomplished in the wake of 9/11. I don't think she'll try to extend the Monroe doctrine to the whole world as they long to do.

More hawkish than I'd like? Yes. Dangerously so? Highly unlikely.

Trump? I mean, uhh, who the fuck has the vaguest idea? I don't think even he does.

 

[crashtech]

So, wait... you link opinion pieces to substantiate an assertion of fact?

Yeah, I'm not all that invested in this discussion. Take it for what it's worth, I feel like I have adequately defended your accusation.

There is a difference, don't you think, between our usual meddling & air support vs full scale invasions at enormous expense & loss of American life?

Yeh, there is a real difference & I have trouble seeing Hillary whipping up an invasion frenzy out of thin air like the Bushistas accomplished in the wake of 9/11. I don't think she'll try to extend the Monroe doctrine to the whole world as they long to do.

More hawkish than I'd like? Yes. Dangerously so? Highly unlikely.

She was Sec. State under a President who really doesn't want to meddle or start wars. There is plenty of anecdotal evidence that she would take a far more hawkish stance than Obama, given more free reign.

Trump? I mean, uhh, who the fuck has the vaguest idea? I don't think even he does.

Sounds right to me, lol. I'm sure the Joint Chiefs will bring him up to speed.

 

[thesmokingman]

Oh christ, Trump is in Socal for a rally and the shit is going crazy. THere's a ton of ppl protesting him. Cops are all over the place, sirens have been non-stop for 30 minutes passing by...

 

[compuwiz1]

Oh christ, Trump is in Socal for a rally and the shit is going crazy. THere's a ton of ppl protesting him. Cops are all over the place, sirens have been non-stop for 30 minutes passing by...

Idiots trying to stifle free speech. Seriously, when will they figure out that shit doesn't work? All it does is waste LEO's time and public resources. They can reach a wider audience on social media.

 

[thesmokingman]

At one point the idiots tried to flip a squad car, poor "06" car. Then they moved their line out to cover that car and the idiots all ran lol.

 

[thesmokingman]

http://ktla.com/2016/04/28/donald-trump-holding-rally-in-costa-mesa-thursday-evening/

 

[compuwiz1]

http://ktla.com/2016/04/28/donald-trump-holding-rally-in-costa-mesa-thursday-evening/

Wow! How come we don't see Trump supporters going to Hillary and Bernie rallies and doing that? The Democratic party seems to encourage that kind of behavior. Breaking shit....a cop car....really?

 

[Carson Dyle]

For a while there I honestly thought Cruz would be the candidate capable of pulling more votes in the general election than Trump, but with how he and the GoP are bungling things, that's not the case any more. They've poisoned the water. And we have more and more of Cruz's colleagues saying things that paint him as a complete a**hole. He's always given that impression, just by the way his physical demeanor and speaking voice make your skin crawl, but it's gone way beyond that now.

Neither of them stand an ice-cube's chance in hell against the Democratic nominee in the November election, but Trump is gaining enough momentum that he could bring out more Republican voters than previously thought.

Gonna be a lot of people holding their noses this fall and casting their votes, although I suspect we're also going to see a record low turnout.

 

[compuwiz1]

Democratic strategist Dave “Mudcat” Saunders believes Donald Trump will beat Hillary Clinton like a “baby seal,” and that working class whites who haven’t already left the Democratic Party for cultural reasons will due so now for economic ones.

Hillary hasn’t been shot at yet. I hear on TV people taking about Bernie Sanders being negative, he ain’t attack her, he just tapped on her,” Mudcat said. He added, “Trump’s going to take a wire-brush to her.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/04/27/d...-beat-hillary-like-a-baby-seal/#ixzz47Bw7rxc3

 

[fskimospy]

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/04/27/d...-beat-hillary-like-a-baby-seal/#ixzz47Bw7rxc3

And what do you think Hillary is going to do to Trump? It will be awfully easy to expose his entire campaign as a scam. You think working class whites are going to leave the Democratic Party for economic reasons? Wait until the Democrats start telling people the thing that Republicans have been afraid to: Trump's campaign platform is all about giving the ultra rich more money. He has tried to claim otherwise, but that's just another lie. I mean hopefully you weren't duped by him into thinking otherwise?

They are sitting on mountains of opposition research right now I'd bet. Trump has been a scumbag for his whole life, there are so many skeletons to uncover it's not even funny.

 

[dank69]

Interesting. Link? I can't for the life of me remember ever saying I'd stay home on election day. With the exception of being busy in Korea once in 2004, I've voted in all of the elections since I was eligible.




Ok, I'm not going to indulge your sanctimonious prick routine any longer; a choice to not vote for someone who has proven themselves dishonest and corrupt simply means I place principles higher than short term victory. I alluded to this earlier but you seem intent on ignoring it. Whatever. If you don't see Hillary's negatives as a conflict of interest for what she says, that's your choice. If you don't agree with my initial post, that's fine too, but I have a problem with you putting words in my mouth. Got a problem with something I posted? Quote it, but keep your assumptions to yourself. I'd also appreciate you keeping a hold on some context - you'll notice I was talking about non-GOP voters to begin with, not myself.

I'm not sure what "stories" you are referring to because you haven't specified, but I suspect my mention of the FBI is what hit a nerve. I think this is where you get to show that the State Department and the FBI are lying about the investigation, or at least part of the right wing media and the cesspool it maintains. Now might also be a good time to point out I haven't passed judgement on this email issue, and just want to the FBI to hurry up and "let the cards fall as they may." Quit acting like this is wishful thinking from Fox and Friends, the FBI doesn't put a dozen guys on something unless they have a good reason - even a critic of the FBI like me knows that.

If she is as innocent as you and others proclaim, then you have nothing to worry about and shouldn't let my desire for the FBI to get on with it make you stoop to such accusatory bullshit.

Look, are you voting for the Klinton Koolaid? I find it hard to imagine that you will when you describe it like that, which means no matter what you do you are helping Trump. I assume you aren't pulling the lever for him so if you aren't staying home you are voting third party or write-in. Might as well stay home, so my points still stand.

The number of people investigating means nothing with regard to how guilty she is. How many people investigated Benghazi? You think she was guilty there, too? Innocent until proven guilty for everyone except her?

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Wow! How come we don't see Trump supporters going to Hillary and Bernie rallies and doing that? The Democratic party seems to encourage that kind of behavior. Breaking shit....a cop car....really?

Trump supports prefer to sucker punch that's why.

 

[Jhhnn]

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/04/27/d...-beat-hillary-like-a-baby-seal/#ixzz47Bw7rxc3

Laughable-

http://crooksandliars.com/2016/04/mudcat-saunders-jeez-not-guy-again

 

[hal2kilo]

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/04/27/d...-beat-hillary-like-a-baby-seal/#ixzz47Bw7rxc3

Wouldn't expect anything different from that blue dog.

 

[kage69]

Look, are you voting for the Klinton Koolaid? I find it hard to imagine that you will when you describe it like that, which means no matter what you do you are helping Trump. I assume you aren't pulling the lever for him so if you aren't staying home you are voting third party or write-in. Might as well stay home, so my points still stand.

The number of people investigating means nothing with regard to how guilty she is. How many people investigated Benghazi? You think she was guilty there, too? Innocent until proven guilty for everyone except her?

Behold! A true, real-to-forum example of Bern Out!

Side with big money instead of the growing, energetic popular momentum that usually is the case with nominees. Be that "supporter" who chooses to ignore Bernie is the one wining all the open primaries. All I've said is be ready for a possible nasty surprise, and if that bunches your panties up well frankly my darling I don't give a fuck.

But thank you for confirming my suspicions on your motives. I'll disregard your future posts accordingly. Your refusal to make this about anything but me, paired with the parting limp shots at trying to portray me as someone who doesn't believe in due process, and even a Benghazi believer - just... wow, priceless!

Here's hoping you get better in December :thumbsup:

 

[zinfamous]

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/04/27/d...-beat-hillary-like-a-baby-seal/#ixzz47Bw7rxc3

this must be the guy that advised Karl Rove in 2012, right?

 

[Jhhnn]

this must be the guy that advised Karl Rove in 2012, right?

He's just a trash talking guy that the Squaller could claim was a "Democratic Strategist".

It's otherwise known as bullshit.

 

[dank69]

Behold! A true, real-to-forum example of Bern Out!

Side with big money instead of the growing, energetic popular momentum that usually is the case with nominees. Be that "supporter" who chooses to ignore Bernie is the one wining all the open primaries. All I've said is be ready for a possible nasty surprise, and if that bunches your panties up well frankly my darling I don't give a fuck.

But thank you for confirming my suspicions on your motives. I'll disregard your future posts accordingly. Your refusal to make this about anything but me, paired with the parting limp shots at trying to portray me as someone who doesn't believe in due process, and even a Benghazi believer - just... wow, priceless!

Here's hoping you get better in December :thumbsup:

My posts are clearly going over your head. For example, I asked you about Benghazi knowing you don't believe it is anything but a GOP witch hunt. Just wondering why you think the email investigation isn't just more of the same.

You say you believe in due process but you've already made up your mind about the email investigation.