• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Trump's lawyer created shell corporation to hide payment to porn star

Page 12 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
tweaker2 said:
And Melania is not saying a word about any of this these unfaithful acts. If I were her I would be shamefully embarrassed to be seen with her husband in public and repulsively horrified to be in the same bed with him. It's like Trump put her on the same level of significance as every other tawdry whore and slut that he had adulterous sex with.
Click to expand...
She putting on a real big show with her, Oh, how ironic, Cyber bullying initiative. Her master is the master cyber bully.
 
Bitek said:
STIs or no, that shit is gross. I wouldn't stick my wang where hundreds of other men blew their load before, or kiss the lips that have wrapped around and dripped from 100s of other cocks.

No amt of testing or scrubbing gets that clean. Shocked that President Germaphobe went for it
Click to expand...
What's your cutoff? What if it was dozens of times? What if it was a lot with a single dick?

Your post reeks of ridiculous stereotypes surrounding women and sex.
 
Brainonska511 said:
What's your cutoff? What if it was dozens of times? What if it was a lot with a single dick?

Your post reeks of ridiculous stereotypes surrounding women and sex.
Click to expand...

We're talking about a porn star. It's not a stereotype when there is video evidence. Wtf.

I would draw the line somewhere around less than porn star and more around a woman your parents and potential children would be proud of.

Does anyone ever wish their mom was a porn star, with freely available videos of all sorts for your friends, schoolmates and family to watch?

Lots of different families out there, so draw your levels of dignity and self-respect where you want.
 
Bitek said:
STIs or no, that shit is gross. I wouldn't stick my wang where hundreds of other men blew their load before, or kiss the lips that have wrapped around and dripped from 100s of other cocks.

No amt of testing or scrubbing gets that clean. Shocked that President Germaphobe went for it
Click to expand...

It is all in your imagination, the truth is that simple soap and water gets it clean to clinical levels. You have come into contact with considerably more human bodily fluid opening doors then you would having sex with a pornstar, because when was the last time someone washed their door handle?
 
SMOGZINN said:
It is all in your imagination, the truth is that simple soap and water gets it clean to clinical levels. You have come into contact with considerably more human bodily fluid opening doors then you would having sex with a pornstar, because when was the last time someone washed their door handle?
Click to expand...

If you're ok screwing porn stars and screened prostitutes, more power to you.
 
Bitek said:
We're talking about a porn star. It's not a stereotype when there is video evidence. Wtf.

I would draw the line somewhere around less than porn star and more around a woman your parents and potential children would be proud of.

Does anyone ever wish their mom was a porn star, with freely available videos of all sorts for your friends, schoolmates and family to watch?

Lots of different families out there, so draw your levels of dignity and self-respect where you want.
Click to expand...
Not to single you out but the post fits. I have noticed people on both sides are marginalizing these women. They are the porn star. Then playboy centrefold. The reality tv person.

They are women. That’s should be it. It’s interesting that the labels are always applied no matter who is discussing them.
 
MomentsofSanity said:
Not to single you out but the post fits. I have noticed people on both sides are marginalizing these women. They are the porn star. Then playboy centrefold. The reality tv person.

They are women. That’s should be it. It’s interesting that the labels are always applied no matter who is discussing them.
Click to expand...

Same way people condescendingly mention the plumber, the janitor, dude that works at mcdonalds. You get known for what you do with your life. Porn star isn't exactly at the top of the ranking. I'd consider dating a porn star but I doubt there are many smart ones without coke habits. People always knock stereo types but they are what they are for a reason. Birds of a feather and such.
 
The bigger picture here isn't that he cheated on his wives.

The big picture here is that he is compromised and a clear security risk. He has proven, when faced with embarrassing information, he hides, pays off blackmail and threatens people to keep it quiet. This makes him highly controllable by anyone who has information on him.

Yes, the hypocrisy of the religious right is astounding and repugnant. But the true danger to our country is that our president is compromised and open to blackmail.
 
MomentsofSanity said:
Not to single you out but the post fits. I have noticed people on both sides are marginalizing these women. They are the porn star. Then playboy centrefold. The reality tv person.

They are women. That’s should be it. It’s interesting that the labels are always applied no matter who is discussing them.
Click to expand...

Everyone ends up being defined by their occupation. We are also discussing the male attorneys, reality TV star (Trump) and the bodyguards.

The argument is not that they don't deserve to tell their story because of their occupation. If that was being done, then your point would be valid. All ppl should be free from abuse.

However, that doesn't mean Ms Daniels needs to be personally respected just because she's attacking the scoundrel Trump.

We all make choices in how we live our lives and live with the consequences.

She is quite responsible for herself being in this mess.
-She decided to sell her body and personal dignity for money as her life's work.

-She decided to get personally involved with Trump, knowing full well he was a married man with a recently pregnant wife.

-She entered into the sexual relationship with some degree of expected compensation (ie being booked on Celeb Apprentice, career advancement.) He did also put her up in his hotels and clubs. She did decline the apartment offer tho.

-The relationship was largely transactional. Again, selling her body for gain. No soul mates here.

-Why does she want out of the NDA, give back the $130k, and get into an expensive legal battle with a billionaire? Out of a profound sense of patriotism? Feminist empowerment?

She's been shopping her story for a while, before the Cohen threats. No doubt because she feels she gains more profit more from this path.

This is a story about a trashy man getting involved with a trashy woman and bringing the Springer Show to the White House and the daily news.

They are both disreputable people.
 
Last edited:
Interesting test I found online about this:

BBKwjfn.img



Trump dealing with the evangelicals about Stormy:

BBKtpO8.img
 
Amused said:
The bigger picture here isn't that he cheated on his wives.

The big picture here is that he is compromised and a clear security risk. He has proven, when faced with embarrassing information, he hides, pays off blackmail and threatens people to keep it quiet. This makes him highly controllable by anyone who has information on him.

Yes, the hypocrisy of the religious right is astounding and repugnant. But the true danger to our country is that our president is compromised and open to blackmail.
Click to expand...

It's a massive problem, and this is just one on a multitude of fronts where he could be subject to manipulation or extortion.

It's why voters should have paid attention to all the massive red flags, and ran from a candidate with zero moral character.

If a man assaults women, defrauds students, investors and contractors, cheats on his wife, and lies with every breath... and that's the public information that's slipped out.. You can feel pretty certain there are landmines ahead.

What you don't do is give that type of person control of nuclear weapons, and a Congress with zero appetite for checking power and hope it all goes well. IMO.
 
Last edited:
MomentsofSanity said:
He might have met his match with her and this lawyer. No shame at all and she knows how to use social media quite well. If he ever engages this will be fun to watch.
Click to expand...

IIRC she was thinking of running for Congress awhile back so she has no shame and doesn't care if the whole world knows what she does.
 
MomentsofSanity said:
Man this is awesome. These two are bigger trolls than Trump. What a fucking joke this whole thing is.
Click to expand...

Word!..what a mess

Trump has ignored, other than denying, countless claims by women that he is a groping maniac. Now, of all those women, ONE has something he's afraid of. Probably the same thing Putin has. A picture of his little trumpet. And my gawd, for a megalomaniac narcissistic prick, having a picture of your little penor on the internet would be quite a blow.

Seriously, while I am happy to have him humiliated in any way, I'd rather it be for the many reasons of substance than pics of the the huge prick having a tiny one. Covering up the affair by illegal means, sure, that's fair game, but revenge porn as a political weapon really should be off limits even as a tool against this tool.

I'm sure most people will care not one whit for the size, lack thereof, or even presence or absence of Trump's penis. But he quite evidently does care. Some tyrants are overthrown with gunfire, others the ballot box. Apparently the threat of a dick pic is also a possibility.
 
VRAMdemon said:
Word!..what a mess

Trump has ignored, other than denying, countless claims by women that he is a groping maniac. Now, of all those women, ONE has something he's afraid of. Probably the same thing Putin has. A picture of his little trumpet. And my gawd, for a megalomaniac narcissistic prick, having a picture of your little penor on the internet would be quite a blow.

Seriously, while I am happy to have him humiliated in any way, I'd rather it be for the many reasons of substance than pics of the the huge prick having a tiny one. Covering up the affair by illegal means, sure, that's fair game, but revenge porn as a political weapon really should be off limits even as a tool against this tool.

I'm sure most people will care not one whit for the size, lack thereof, or even presence or absence of Trump's penis. But he quite evidently does care. Some tyrants are overthrown with gunfire, others the ballot box. Apparently the threat of a dick pic is also a possibility.
Click to expand...
I just feel bad for all the news site admins who would need to go in and blur the pixel if pics like that are published.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top