This could be a spot on description, or it could be she's looking to make a buck.
I have no problem believing that she had a fling with Trump, feeling bad about it is also understandable, but a rape accusation is extremely serious, and making that accusation years later at a time when it maximizes personal profit is suspect.
At the end of the day it probably doesn't really matter because like everything else, it will break across party lines.
I understand your position but would change one thing. I would not say “is suspect” but rather “creates the certainty that specific suspicion to will arise in people who harbor such suspicions generally”.
Another of the behaviors I note within myself as a result of my awareness of self hate, is that I was born naive and trusting and not suspicious of much of anything. What was beaten into me, owing to the abnormal conditions of my parents life, was to hold that natural trusting attitude in contempt. And that same abnormality of life that we all live in confirmed the wisdom of it. There is much in the world to distrust.
I think in my case such a good job was done that I eventually threw away all the things I was taught are sacred owing to the suspicion and the pain wrenching confirmation they too were all bull shit.
But, you see, I wasn’t supposed to do that. Those sacred cows that I rejected were what remained of that naive child, the things I was supposed to turn to for certainty and security. I wasn’t supposed to guestion those as just more lies. And that is why in every sacred cow state of delusion altered reality, there arises a bogeyman, the sower of lies and deception, the Satanic purveyor of evil thought. In order not to be deceived you must never wander far from your mental prison. You must turn a deaf ear to deceivers, those who bear false witness to the sacred. And this is a virtue when the real intention is to deceive. It can be a danger when that reaction becomes simply reflexive.
This is why I think your valid suspicion that the motive is money becomes irrelevant in the face of the totality of the data. The truth of her charge makes logical sense whether or not it is influenced by money. The truth is what matters not whether she makes a buck off of it. That’s just a perk if so.
You are using suspicion of motive, a high moral value attitude we both hold, I think, to rigorously in this case. There is, first the job of holding high moral standards like opposition to false witness, but then there is the issue of applying the values properly.