Trump University - a fraud according to students

[buckshot24]

http://us4.campaign-archive2.com/?u=df9a27c10b6d6ba38ba001440&id=f8a4a02241&e=cd8fc1ccd9

"Washington, DC –**** The Hispanic National Bar Association represents the interests of nearly 54 million Hispanics/Latinos in the United States, which is approximately 17% of the U.S. population. By his recent derogatory remarks about Mexican immigrants, Donald Trump’s disrespect of such a large segment of the population of America is not only unbelievable, but outright wrong. His comment that Mexico only sends rapists and criminals to the United States reveals a racist nature that cannot and will not go unnoticed by the Hispanic National Bar Association nor the Latino community.

Those who seek our highest public office should attempt to engage all Americans, not divide us. His comments are clearly divisive and racist and do nothing to promote equality and justice for all. Trump’s statements reveal a bias that all Americans should reject and respond to accordingly. We cannot stand silent and allow Trump to promote such racist and discriminatory behavior. This is the time for all Americans to take a stand against his insensitive, offensive and untrue statements.

The HNBA calls for a boycott of all of Trump business ventures, including golf courses, hotels, and restaurants. We salute NBC/Universal, Univision and Macy’s for ending their association with Trump, and we join them in standing up against bigotry and racist rhetoric. Other businesses and corporations should follow the lead of NBC/Universal, Univision and Macy’s and take similar actions against Donald Trump’s business interests. We can and will make a difference."

Apparently Curiel is a part of this organization.

 

[Moonbeam]

I've watched this joker before. It's the same old "libertarian" bullshit...

What a shame. I watched that video and I believe he completely nailed the situation. What is so evident and obvious about the racist screaming of liberals is in my opinion incredibly sick.

 

[DrDoug]

What a shame. I watched that video and I believe he completely nailed the situation. What is so evident and obvious about the racist screaming of liberals is in my opinion incredibly sick.

If you think this fool "completely nailed the situation" then you have no idea what is actually going on with Trump his racist antics regarding his lawsuit and the judge. Read up on the law to see how full of shit Trump is about what he is saying. In addition to that, look up Stefan Molyneux and Joe Rogan for a real story about someone who completely nails Molyneux's ass to the wall.

I'm sure that Molyneux regrets that interview to this day...lol!

 

[KMFJD]

What a shame. I watched that video and I believe he completely nailed the situation. What is so evident and obvious about the racist screaming of liberals is in my opinion incredibly sick.

Did Moonie have a breakdown or something in the last year that i missed?

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Did Moonie have a breakdown or something in the last year that i missed?

I'd say he went off the rails, but I think that train long left the station, he does seem to have more of a negative slant than before though.

 

[sm625]

Like the left is gonna be bothered to listen to Stefan "blather" for 44 minutes. Do you know how many logical fallacies and non-arguments a leftist can come up with in 44 minutes?

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Like the left is gonna be bothered to listen to Stefan "blather" for 44 minutes. Do you know how many logical fallacies and non-arguments a leftist can come up with in 44 minutes?

not nearly as many as stefan.

 

[fskimospy]

Like the left is gonna be bothered to listen to Stefan "blather" for 44 minutes. Do you know how many logical fallacies and non-arguments a leftist can come up with in 44 minutes?

Probably not as many as that clown. He's the classic YouTube ponce who read the back of a self help philosophy book and now thinks he has the revealed truth. I've tried listening to him out of pure intellectual interest but his videos are just too cringe inducing to make it through. Any time he runs into an actual philosopher he just gets shredded.

I pity anyone who has been taken in by that fraud.

 

[swamplizard]

I may go back to bed.

 

[PottedMeat]

Educate yourself - by learning about flamethrowers

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPQYK5ZMbWY

 

[thraashman]

I was trying to figure out why 0roo0roo was all of a sudden jumping on the Trump bandwagon, and then I looked up this Stefan Molyneux clown. And he's one of those Return of Kings type MRA jackasses. And it hit me, 0roo0roo doesn't give a shit whether or not Trump is racist or xenophobic or a fraud or whatever. For anyone that's paid any attention to his obsession of gamer gate knows that he's a rampant misogynist and Trump has spent decades being one of the most misogynistic asswipes in this country. So of course 0roo0roo loves him and would hate the idea of a woman being President. Now we just need to wait for someone like Blue_Max or MagickMan to come in here since I'm sure they masturbate to videos by Molyneux.

 

[IBMer]

Here is the real fact about this whole situation.

Trumps lawyer has not and said will not file a motion for recusal. That right there speaks to any facts if the judge is acting outside of ethics. Its all hot air.

 

[swamplizard]

Here is the real fact about this whole situation.

Trumps lawyer has not and said will not file a motion for recusal. That right there speaks to any facts if the judge is acting outside of ethics. Its all hot air.

Quite possibly diversionary, what does Trump not want us to investigate?

 

[PokerGuy]

Seems very likely that the judge would indeed be prejudiced against Trump and his business, but there's no logical way to fix that problem. If you get unlucky and your case happens to come before a judge that for whatever reasons (ideological or otherwise) is prejudiced against your side, you're pretty much screwed. If there is actual direct evidence of conflict of interest etc, you can push for recusal, but not for something like this.

Trump was dumb to open his mouth about it. It's possible or even likely that he's right about the judge being biased against him in the case, but it's just not a politically tenable position to publicly come out and say it. You're still not going to get a different outcome, there's no upside.

 

[PokerGuy]

Here is the real fact about this whole situation.

Trumps lawyer has not and said will not file a motion for recusal. That right there speaks to any facts if the judge is acting outside of ethics. Its all hot air.

Actually, that doesn't say much. A judge can easily be biased or prejudiced against you or your position, but that doesn't mean he's acting outside of judicial or ethical guidelines. I can't see any way a motion for recusal could possibly succeed in such a case (nor should it), so there's no point in filing it.

 

[fskimospy]

Actually, that doesn't say much. A judge can easily be biased or prejudiced against you or your position, but that doesn't mean he's acting outside of judicial or ethical guidelines. I can't see any way a motion for recusal could possibly succeed in such a case (nor should it), so there's no point in filing it.

I wonder what Trump would say if the reverse were the case and the plaintiffs said a white judge was biased against them because he was white.

 

[Mandres]

Here is the real fact about this whole situation.

Trumps lawyer has not and said will not file a motion for recusal. That right there speaks to any facts if the judge is acting outside of ethics. Its all hot air.

Bingo. Whatever it takes to get his name in the headlines for another week.

 

[buckshot24]

Quite possibly diversionary, what does Trump not want us to investigate?

Wonderful logic there. He doesn't file for recusal so he must be hiding something! Trump still hasn't accounted for his whereabouts on November 22, 1963. What is he hiding?

 

[buckshot24]

Actually, that doesn't say much. A judge can easily be biased or prejudiced against you or your position, but that doesn't mean he's acting outside of judicial or ethical guidelines. I can't see any way a motion for recusal could possibly succeed in such a case (nor should it), so there's no point in filing it.

All it takes is an appearance of impropriety.

 

[Jhhnn]

Bingo. Whatever it takes to get his name in the headlines for another week.

It's a good strategy when you're merely a reality TV celebrity or when you're just trying to capture the limited number of votes from disaffected outrage addicts. Say anything, the more outrageous, the better.

When you're trying to become the leader of the Free World, the rules are different. Open expressions of bigotry are simply lethal & something that can't be taken back. ATM, neither Trump nor his fanbois realize that's true but they will soon enough. They're walking into the election with their eyes wide shut.

 

[Jaskalas]

I wonder what Trump would say if the reverse were the case and the plaintiffs said a white judge was biased against them because he was white.

Your parallel only works if said white judge belonged to a "KKK" lawyers association.

 

[buckshot24]

Your parallel only works if said white judge belonged to a "KKK" lawyers association.

Just an organization that only helped white students become lawyers.

 

[fskimospy]

Your parallel only works if said white judge belonged to a "KKK" lawyers association.

That would be wrong for two reasons:

First, Trump mentioned that his Mexican ancestry was an inherent conflict all by itself.

Second, comparing that professional organization to the KKK is in and of itself an offensive slur. Gross. Please go learn more about that association.

 

[Jaskalas]

Second, comparing that professional organization to the KKK is in and of itself an offensive slur. Gross. Please go learn more about that association.

Your misrepresentation of my position is an offensive slur.

La Raza = KKK.
"La Raza" Lawyer's association would translate into "KKK" Lawyer's association.

What, you're offended that a professional organization shares the name of a racial supremacist movement? Yeah, me too! You can be certain of the bias of those who would knowingly associate themselves with such.

 

[fskimospy]

Your misrepresentation of my position is an offensive slur.

La Raza = KKK.
La Raza "Lawyer's association" would translate into KKK "Lawyer's association".

I'm sorry but repeating your slur does not make it any better. La Raza does not equal KKK by any definition that I am aware of. If you can show me a link to a dictionary that translates 'La Raza' to mean 'Ku Klux Klan' then I will retract this statement. If you can't, you should retract yours.

What, you're offended that a "professional organization" shares the name of a racial supremacist movement? Yeah, me too! You can be certain of the bias of those who would knowingly associate themselves with such.

It does not share the name, it shares a word. By your logic we should consider the Democratic Party to be the analogous to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, ie: North Korea. Do you think that is the case? If not, can you explain the difference?