Trump: 'Second Amendment people' could deal with Clinton

[Jhhnn]

"Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up, and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better. This is a most valuable - a most sacred right - a right, which we hope and believe, is to liberate the world." - some terrorist who incidentally had his visage carved 60ft tall on to the side of a mountain in the United States in an area that is protected as a national park.

Which was before the Constitution, before establishment of the govt of the people. It's simply wrong to encourage political violence when the ballot box is open to everybody.

It's Bundyite territory.

 

[Jhhnn]

D/P

 

[Knowing]

Which was before the Constitution, before establishment of the govt of the people. It's simply wrong to encourage political violence when the ballot box is open to everybody.

It's Bundyite territory.

I didn't know that Lincoln was pre constitution.

 

[Jhhnn]

"Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up, and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better. This is a most valuable - a most sacred right - a right, which we hope and believe, is to liberate the world." - some terrorist who incidentally had his visage carved 60ft tall on to the side of a mountain in the United States in an area that is protected as a national park.

Which was before the Constitution, before establishment of the govt of the people. It's simply wrong to encourage political violence when the ballot box is open to everybody.

It's Bundyite territory.

 

[Jhhnn]

I didn't know that Lincoln was pre constitution.

That was the time he referenced.

 

[Knowing]

That was the time he referenced.

That really comes through with "any people anywhere" and "most sacred right."

Edit: and "whole world"

 

[Jhhnn]

That really Congress through with "any people anywhere" and "most sacred right."

I googled your Lincoln quote. It was in reference to the Texian revolution of 1836. They only seceded from Mexico to retain slavery. Even Lincoln talked shit on occasion.

Which really has nothing to do with Trump's bullshit. He didn't suggest revolution but rather murder.

 

[fskimospy]

I mentioned an option even if that was the case. No one has referenced it. I can't tell if it's because you're all so frothy or just don't read to the end by default.

Right, an option that only made sense if you altered what he said. Nobody is frothy, you just made a stupid post doing your normal concern trolling.

Do you think you are being oppressed again? If not, just accept that you made a dumb post. How hard is that? As always, I'm here to help you.

 

[Knowing]

They only seceded from Mexico to retain slavery. Even Lincoln talked shit on occasion.

Which really has nothing to do with Trump's bullshit. He didn't suggest revolution but rather murder.

Which they felt was their right. You're using a modern lens to be critical. I'm not even sure why, it's silly.

I disagree about the murder accusation, but even if it was as you day it is, it would be a political murder "terrorism" and could lead to revolution.

Can we get a head count in here of the people who, not more than a month ago, were legitimizing violence against police because the perpetrators had a grievance?

 

[fskimospy]

Which they felt was their right. You're using a modern lens to be critical. I'm not even sure why, it's silly.

I disagree about the murder accusation, but even if it was as you day it is, it would be a political murder "terrorism" and could lead to revolution.

Can we get a head count in here of the people who, not more than a month ago, were legitimizing violence against police because the perpetrators had a grievance?

I think if you found a person in this thread who condoned anti-police violence and is now condemning Trump's obvious call to violence you should absolutely post it.

 

[Knowing]

Right, an option that only made sense if you altered what he said. Nobody is frothy, you just made a stupid post doing your normal concern trolling.

Do you think you are being oppressed again? If not, just accept that you made a dumb post. How hard is that? As always, I'm here to help you.

“By the way, if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is."

I said they could influence her. Trying to exert influence is "do(ing)" something, is it not?

Please help me because apparently I said things that I didn't say and didn't say things that are showing up on my screen.

 

[sandorski]

I have nothing to say to them. Writing them anything would be an exercise in time wasting.



If that's the case then it is unfortunate, but ultimately all political power issues from the barrel of a gun.

That's retarded.

 

[UberNeuman]

There is no defense of the indefensible. So, just stop Trump supporters. Quit trying to defect. Quit trying to change the subject.

He just fucked you real good.

 

[UberNeuman]

dp

 

[Knowing]

That's retarded.

Is it? Are the police not men with guns? Does the IRS have men with guns? The FBI?

If you act out against the government and it bothers some faceless ticket punching bureaucrat enough you will be visited by men with guns.

Free answer: the Southern rebellion was put down by men with ____?

 

[fskimospy]

“By the way, if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is."

I said they could influence her. Trying to exert influence is "do(ing)" something, is it not?

Please help me because apparently I said things that I didn't say and didn't say things that are showing up on my screen.

Yes clearly what was implied there was that if Hillary Clinton were elected 'second amendment people' could implore her to choose a different justice.

You are an annoying poster not because you are entirely a right wing troll, it's because you are shitty at what you try to do. It's all 'I'm oppressed' concern trolling and 'who, me?' bullshit.

I would welcome genuine and smart conservative thought from you instead of the vacuous victimized stupidity you bring.

 

[sandorski]

Is it? Are the police not men with guns? Does the IRS have men with guns? The FBI?

If you act out against the government and it bothers some faceless ticket punching bureaucrat enough you will be visited by men with guns.

Free answer: the Southern rebellion was put down by men with ____?

It's retarded because no matter how much you don't like Hillary, she isn't a monster that needs put down. Even having this discussion as it might be an option just shows what a vile POS you are.

 

[rudder]

I googled your Lincoln quote. It was in reference to the Texian revolution of 1836. They only seceded from Mexico to retain slavery. Even Lincoln talked shit on occasion.

Which really has nothing to do with Trump's bullshit. He didn't suggest revolution but rather murder.

Trump,suggested murder? A little bit of a strrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeettttttttttccccccccchhhhhhhh don't you think?

These pro 2A NRA gun owner types our some of the most law abiding citizens around. Only a liberal tool would think trump was referring to inciting violence versus people underestimating the political fortitude of this group.

Even if Hillary wasn't a disabled criminal bought and paid for lying piece of scat.... I would not vote for her just because of her intentions in regards to gun control. It is that important to me and a lot of people.

 

[UberNeuman]

The news has become so dire that Fox News is showing Trump as Donald Trump (D)!

 

[flexy]

Trump,suggested murder? A little bit of a strrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeettttttttttccccccccchhhhhhhh don't you think?

I do not see where there is ANY relation between "picking supreme court justices...can't do anything about it" and "the second amendment"...unless someone implies riots and violence...and yes, in a sense this means murdering. Otherwise I have no explanation about why he would think about "second amendment people" in this context.

What ELSE do you think did he imply when he said that?

You can't face the truth, can't face the fact that he INDEED implied that armed people "could do something about it", because this is *exactly* why he said it? Still not convinced that guy is not all there mentally? How much more proof does the world need?

 

[Knowing]

It's retarded because no matter how much you don't like Hillary, she isn't a monster that needs put down. Even having this discussion as it might be an option just shows what a vile POS you are.

I think she is actually a monster but "if" she's guilty of crimes she should have all the benefit of our legal system (the real one, not the one that kills children without trials). Not once have I suggested that she should be "put down." For goodness sakes, I'm not even sure how you could come to such a conclusion. If she were to be killed she'd be martyred and it would be forever off limits to remind everyone how awful she was.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Yea, it's not going unnoticed
really wish I could copy the image of the tweet here, but the text is

The Secret Service is aware of the comments made earlier this afternoon.

https://twitter.com/SecretService/status/763142627202048000

Check me if I'm wrong Sandy, but the one group of law enforcement that truly does not fuck around is the Secret Service. Not that the FBI or CIA was clowntown. But the Secret Service is an elite corp, to the best of my knowledge.

 

[Schmide]

Enough with the false equivalency. Talk about thug trump or GTFO

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Free answer: the Southern rebellion was put down by men with ____?

Industry, Finance and defined processes for organization.

I do have to ask how does this relate to the topic. I am so tired of people left and right distracting from the subject. You either think what Trump said was right, wrong or irresponsible or maybe chose poor words. The Civil War does not factor into that answer.

 

[Schmide]

(delayed double lol)