Zaap
Diamond Member
- Jun 12, 2008
- 7,162
- 424
- 126
Good luck but its his ilks way to always conflate the issues between income and consumption taxes.In this case however we're talking about how to reduce taxation. If you think the proper way is to always give the shaft to the rich guy just because "they deserve it" then you should abandon all pretense of fairness and not be surprised when those rich folks don't exactly cooperate with you.
In a nutshell, its like believing the ONE millionaire in a town of 10,000 other non-millionaires is going to (by virtue of his wealth status) pay the same amount of consumption taxes as the 10, 000 other residents. So never mind his higher share of income taxes paid. Nope, toss that out. Roast him for the fact that when he buys groceries he doesn't automatically outspend (and pay more taxes doing so) than the entire rest of the town.
Roast him because as a millionaire he doesn't register and pay taxes on 10,000 vehicles at the DMV, rather, just the one or two he actually owns.
It totally makes sense that the numerically smaller 1% who have large incomes must do everything tax wise in numeric proportion to the 99%.
