Lanyap
Elite Member
- Dec 23, 2000
- 8,100
- 2,154
- 136
Breaking news: Biden just reclassified the documents using his thoughts. He will send a tweet shortly to make it official.
Wonder when dark Biden will troll the orange monkey about this?Breaking news: Biden just reclassified the documents using his thoughts. He will send a tweet shortly to make it official.
I think any competent defense attorney would personally strangle Trump before allowing him to get on the witness stand for cross examination.
A complete smackdown by the appellate court in just one day. Unanimous decision. This woman can't remain on the bench without being disciplined. They ruled she "abused her discretion". In other words, we caught you favoring Trump at the detriment of the country and the rule of law.Impeachment? Surely she cant continue in a trusted office?
"That was the most polite way the appellate court could smack down Judge Cannon," national security attorney says
Too bad she'll never be punished and will possibly be rewarded.A complete smackdown by the appellate court in just one day. Unanimous decision. This woman can't remain on the bench without being disciplined. They ruled she "abused her discretion". In other words, we caught you favoring Trump at the detriment of the country and the rule of law.
“Trump’s worst day ever”: Appeals court says Mar-a-Lago judge “abused” discretion by backing Trump | Salon.com
I think Trump is comfortable on the witness stand. He has pleaded the 5th more than all the Mafia bosses combined.I think any competent defense attorney would personally strangle Trump before allowing him to get on the witness stand for cross examination.
From the piece;A complete smackdown by the appellate court in just one day. Unanimous decision. This woman can't remain on the bench without being disciplined. They ruled she "abused her discretion". In other words, we caught you favoring Trump at the detriment of the country and the rule of law.
“Trump’s worst day ever”: Appeals court says Mar-a-Lago judge “abused” discretion by backing Trump | Salon.com
Yeah, saw it on MTN and posted it here a few days ago.One thing that's kind of going unnoticed is that the 11th circuit likely had some of this opinion already written and teed up ready to go before the deadline even came. This was because of how bad a decision Cannon made and it was easy for them to do it without needing to wait on whatever legal trash would come from Team Treason.
While the appeals court panel almost certainly put together much of the background context over the weekend and Monday prior to getting reply brief from Trump, they did take time to update it with the very latest - including material from Tuesday afternoon hearing with Special Master Judge Dearie - before publishing their opinion. But getting a 3 panel judge to fully agree on exact language by Wednesday, particularly this harsh of language, the day after Tuesday reply briefing and Tuesday PM hearing in another court is indeed quite rapid.One thing that's kind of going unnoticed is that the 11th circuit likely had some of this opinion already written and teed up ready to go before the deadline even came. This was because of how bad a decision Cannon made and it was easy for them to do it without needing to wait on whatever legal trash would come from Team Treason.
They can keep making shit up for talking trash on TV, until/unless this goes to criminal trial and trial judge tells them to stop it.so this special master ain't fuckin around
Mar-a-Lago special master orders Trump team to back up any claims of FBI 'planting' evidence | CNN Politics
The special master overseeing the Mar-a-Lago documents investigation has ordered former President Donald Trump's lawyers to back up out-of-court assertions that the FBI may have planted evidence at the property during their search last month.www.cnn.com
now, can they get nailed for making shit up? or not really?
Here's a little quip in regard to Trump's ability to declassify documents by just thinking about it.
"Attorney and former FBI Agent Asha Rangappa joked, "he’s actually invoking the Secret Telepathic Unilateral Preemptive Irreversible Declassification (S.T.U.P.I.D.) defense." "
From that thread:
"He failed with his "Intelligence Document Is Owned (by) Trump" (I.D.I.O.T.) defense and had to upgrade to yours. "
A complete smackdown by the appellate court in just one day. Unanimous decision. This woman can't remain on the bench without being disciplined. They ruled she "abused her discretion". In other words, we caught you favoring Trump at the detriment of the country and the rule of law.
“Trump’s worst day ever”: Appeals court says Mar-a-Lago judge “abused” discretion by backing Trump | Salon.com
Agreed, although, having found a fatal flaw with abuse of discretion on step 1 and stating that is sufficient to grant the stay, continuing on for another 10 pages dissecting how every subsequent step by Cannon was also wrong "for the sake of completeness" is a wee bit unusual. That is, not particularly unusual to complete analysis of all factors even when 1st step failure is fatal and undisputed, but rather unusual to reverse on every single step of a 4 step test, as well as reversing every single element of Cannon's ruling on balance of interests.Abuse of discretion is legal jargon, particularly as pertaining to appeals. "Abuse of discretion" is actually the highest standard of appellate review. Certain types of rulings are considered "discretionary" to the trial court, meaning you have to make an especially good showing that it was a bad decision before the appeals court will reverse. So yes, it's saying something negative when they rule it as "abuse of discretion" but it isn't super uncommon for judges to be reversed on that ground and unfortunately it won't get her thrown off the bench.
Agreed, although, having found a fatal flaw with abuse of discretion on step 1 and stating that is sufficient to grant the stay, continuing on for another 10 pages dissecting how every subsequent step by Cannon was also wrong "for the sake of completeness" is a wee bit unusual. That is, not particularly unusual to complete analysis of all factors even when 1st step failure is fatal and undisputed, but rather unusual to reverse on every single step of a 4 step test, as well as reversing every single element of Cannon's ruling on balance of interests.
Trump is trolling hard now with these nutty interviews and whackadoodle "looks at me" rallies.