Trump is starting to block people on Twitter

[brycejones]

Thanks for the link from a right wing advocacy organization that's already been discussed in this thread, associated with the oh-so-accurate book Clinton Cash no less! This sounds like a VERY credible organization, haha.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Accountability_Institute

Sources, DSF. Sources, sources, sources. Don't you ever get tired of being duped?

Next we'll be accused of mis-quoting him or something.

 

[shortylickens]

I think I may finally get an account just so I can be banned by Adolf Trump.

 

[fskimospy]

Next we'll be accused of mis-quoting him or something.

Oh you KNOW that's coming, hahaha. Will probably be followed up shortly thereafter with accusations that we're all attempting to frame him and that we're all liars.

 

[MomentsofSanity]

Obama has skipped roughly 60% of his intelligence briefings...where's your outrage been hiding all this time?

http://www.g-a-i.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/GAI-Report-PDB-Update-9.29.2014.pdf

You don't think this actually means something do you? You know this isn't a government report right?

Edit: nevermind fski got it already.

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

Thanks for the link from a right wing advocacy organization that's already been discussed in this thread, associated with the oh-so-accurate book Clinton Cash no less! This sounds like a VERY credible organization, haha.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Accountability_Institute

Sources, DSF. Sources, sources, sources. Don't you ever get tired of being duped?

And where are your sources to back up your assertion that he attended an "overwhelming majority" of these briefings?

 

[PokerGuy]

Obama has skipped roughly 60% of his intelligence briefings...where's your outrage been hiding all this time?

http://www.g-a-i.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/GAI-Report-PDB-Update-9.29.2014.pdf

But... .but.... that's different, for reasons!

Now back to Trump rage!

 

[imported_tajmahal]

So we can check MSNBC. Right ?
"According to the “Government Accountability Institute,” since President Obama’s second inaugural, he’s received in-person daily intelligence briefings 41.26% of the time, and written daily intelligence briefings 58.74% of the time. Under the White House’s system, if the president has follow-up questions or requests additional details after reading the written report, intelligence officials then provide more information upon request.
Why is this interesting? It’s not."

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/the-re-emergence-the-intelligence-briefings-attack
So tell us, did President -elect Trump get those written briefings and it doesn't really matter? I'm loving watching all you lefties running around and crying post election tears.

 

[PokerGuy]

Sources, DSF. Sources, sources, sources. Don't you ever get tired of being duped?

So he provides a source, and you say it's a lousy one.... and you provide none. Brilliant!

I have no idea how many obummer attended or didn't attend. Doesn't really matter one way or another, but the faux outrage at Trump is wonderful though!

 

[fskimospy]

So he provides a source, and you say it's a lousy one.... and you provide none. Brilliant!

I have no idea how many obummer attended or didn't attend. Doesn't really matter one way or another, but the faux outrage at Trump is wonderful though!

It's not my job to disprove a clearly biased source, it's his job to provide credible evidence.

 

[fskimospy]

So we can check MSNBC. Right ?
"According to the “Government Accountability Institute,” since President Obama’s second inaugural, he’s received in-person daily intelligence briefings 41.26% of the time, and written daily intelligence briefings 58.74% of the time. Under the White House’s system, if the president has follow-up questions or requests additional details after reading the written report, intelligence officials then provide more information upon request.
Why is this interesting? It’s not."

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/the-re-emergence-the-intelligence-briefings-attack
So tell us, did President -elect Trump get those written briefings and it doesn't really matter? I'm loving watching all you lefties running around and crying post election tears.

So a different news organization quoting the exact same conservative advocacy organization? Why would that be better?

 

[JD50]

And where are your sources to back up your assertion that he attended an "overwhelming majority" of these briefings?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...cec35b1ad25_story.html?utm_term=.47081bb9ea3a

After his election in 2008, President Obama took part not only in regular intelligence briefings but also scheduled “deep dives” on key subjects including Iran’s nuclear program and covert CIA operations, including the accelerating campaign of drone strikes in Pakistan.

“During the transition, President Obama was an avid consumer of intelligence,” said retired Lt. Gen. Michael V. Hayden, who was CIA director when Obama was elected.

 

[First]

Man, can you imagine a being a P&N poster who feels a need to defend/deflect for Trump for 4 yrs (assuming he makes it a full term)? You've got to have terrible judgement to make excuses for a POTUS so unqualified for the office that he wouldn't be hired to run a local PTA meeting let alone a country. You peeps gotta be easily duped to make excuses for this.

 

[BonzaiDuck]

So we can check MSNBC. Right ?
"According to the “Government Accountability Institute,” since President Obama’s second inaugural, he’s received in-person daily intelligence briefings 41.26% of the time, and written daily intelligence briefings 58.74% of the time. Under the White House’s system, if the president has follow-up questions or requests additional details after reading the written report, intelligence officials then provide more information upon request.
Why is this interesting? It’s not."

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/the-re-emergence-the-intelligence-briefings-attack
So tell us, did President -elect Trump get those written briefings and it doesn't really matter? I'm loving watching all you lefties running around and crying post election tears.

You folks keep acting like we're sore because "you won; we lost."

To us, it's more of a problem that we all lost, just for some reverence for the Truth and civility, but we imagine or suspect much worse as time passes.

 

[First]

Wrong.

http://www.g-a-i.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/GAI-Report-PDB-Update-9.29.2014.pdf

Haha, annnnd case in point.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Oh Noes!

 

[imported_tajmahal]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...cec35b1ad25_story.html?utm_term=.47081bb9ea3a

Sorry, but fskimo already said that things the Washington Post publish aren't real news and can't be trusted, you obviously haven't heard the new fake news meme.

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

So a different news organization quoting the exact same conservative advocacy organization? Why would that be better?

Waiting for you to either provide sources for your previous statement or admit that you're making up horseshit as you go along.

 

[fskimospy]

Sorry, but fskimo already said that things the Washington Post publish aren't real news and can't be trusted, you obviously haven't heard the new fake news meme.

Do you understand the difference between a news story and an op-ed?

 

[fskimospy]

Waiting for you to either provide sources for your previous statement or admit that you're making up horseshit as you go along.

lol, first of all I said 'pretty sure', and that 'pretty sure' has already been substantiated by JD50 from a credible organization. You on the other hand provided a right wing advocacy organization piece.

Sources, sources, sources.

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

Do you understand the difference between a news story and an op-ed?

Do you understand the difference between a lie and the truth?

 

[1sikbITCH]

So he provides a source, and you say it's a lousy one.... and you provide none. Brilliant!

I have no idea how many obummer attended or didn't attend. Doesn't really matter one way or another, but the faux outrage at Trump is wonderful though!

Who do you think is faking outrage at Trump?

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

lol, first of all I said 'pretty sure', and that 'pretty sure' has already been substantiated by JD50 from a credible organization. You on the other hand provided a right wing advocacy organization piece.

Sources, sources, sources.

So you have nothing...no sources at all. Imagine that! Look at you...hypocrite extraordinaire.

 

[JSt0rm]

Sorry, but fskimo already said that things the Washington Post publish aren't real news and can't be trusted, you obviously haven't heard the new fake news meme.

uneducated people like this are why we are ruined.

 

[brycejones]

So a different news organization quoting the exact same conservative advocacy organization? Why would that be better?

It's the way the fake news cycle works. Reference a single questionable source from multiple sites and then assume because 15 different sites are saying the same thing it must be true. The recent CNN is showing porn story is a great example. People are talking about it, people are saying must be legit.

 

[PokerGuy]

It's not my job to disprove a clearly biased source, it's his job to provide credible evidence.

Lets see... you posted: "Pretty sure Obama went to the overwhelming majority of his national security briefings. Maybe Trump needs tips from Obama on time management?", yet provided no source. Is it someone else's job to provide a source for your claims? Then you turn around and whine about the source someone else provided without providing any source at all. Twisting yourself into a pretzel as usual I see.