• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Trump/GOP Civil War

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Pens1566 said:
Got any specifics or are you going to continue to lean on the one you've posted (from the alt-right twitter sphere talking points machine) that's already been debunked?
Click to expand...
Ohh, one was debunked, but the others haven't.

You go the wiki and look for the one where podesta fully admits she hates americans.
 
LegendKiller said:
Ohh, one was debunked, but the others haven't.

You go the wiki and look for the one where podesta fully admits she hates americans.
Click to expand...

You already linked that and that's not what it says. He's referring to the phrase 'everyday americans', not the people. If he were referring to the group of people known as 'everyday Americans' that makes his sentence (and email as a whole) incoherent.

Looks like you got duped again! You are seriously the world's easiest mark.
 
LegendKiller said:
Ohh, one was debunked, but the others haven't.

You go the wiki and look for the one where podesta fully admits she hates americans.
Click to expand...

Uh, that's the one you've already leaned on and had knocked out from under you. The fall and subsequent head injury might explain a lot.

And it seems I wasn't the first one to point this out. Please, continue on with your cognitive dissonance. It's more entertaining than watching my dog fart in her sleep. But only by a little.
 
LegendKiller said:
On the contrary, it is quite fun to see you guys try to defend the fact that hillary is corrupt, knows that we are letting terrorists in, knows saudi and Qatar are funding isis...etc.

Her actions are far worse than trumps yet you don't care

The coordination of the media with hillary, as is being exposed, should alarm everybody. As should the podesta-emails showing that there was coordination at the dept of state with clinton campaign about email releases, info passing to them about congressional inquires re uranium one...etc.

There is no independent media or government, there is the vampire squid. That is all.
Click to expand...

If both Hillary and the media said that 2+2 = 4, you would be convinced it was only because there was a collaboration between the two of them.

No one has received more free advertising in the past two years than Donald Trump. The problem, for him and the Republicans, is that it reveals all of the stupid shit he says.
 
Pens1566 said:
Uh, that's the one you've already leaned on and had knocked out from under you. The fall and subsequent head injury might explain a lot.

And it seems I wasn't the first one to point this out. Please, continue on with your cognitive dissonance. It's more entertaining than watching my dog fart in her sleep. But only by a little.
Click to expand...
Look retard. Not the bucket of losers, thst one, admittedly, was debunked (and never came from wiki). The other, the one that just came out today, was directly from wiki.
 
LegendKiller said:
Please, she trashed these women roundly and protected bill throughout. Most men who bang interns in the Whitehouse would be trashed, utterly, because it is workplace abuse of power. But you only care about some women, not all.

I don't hate you, but hillary does.

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4433
Click to expand...

So, no links, huh? But you still believe every word you said, obviously. Has it ever occurred to you that you might believe in lies? Or does truthiness rule your mind entirely?
 
LegendKiller said:
Look retard. Not the bucket of losers, thst one, admittedly, was debunked (and never came from wiki). The other, the one that just came out today, was directly from wiki.
Click to expand...
I believe that should be "Look retard,"
The period implies you're pointing out a retard, which means you're probably typing in front of a mirror.
 
LegendKiller said:
Look retard. Not the bucket of losers, thst one, admittedly, was debunked (and never came from wiki). The other, the one that just came out today, was directly from wiki.
Click to expand...

Hey fuckstick, it's the link you posted earlier (quoted below so you can't weasel out of it) that has already been all over twitter today and roundly debunked. And as already pointed out here, the fucking email doesn't make any sense if you interpret it the way your masters have directed you to. If you read it with common sense (I know, tall order for you) then its very easy to see why you couldn't be more wrong. And also why it was very easily brushed aside as garbage by the members of the species with synaptic activity.

LegendKiller said:
Please, she trashed these women roundly and protected bill throughout. Most men who bang interns in the Whitehouse would be trashed, utterly, because it is workplace abuse of power. But you only care about some women, not all.

I don't hate you, but hillary does.

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4433
Click to expand...
 
Pens1566 said:
Hey fuckstick, it's the link you posted earlier (quoted below so you can't weasel out of it) that has already been all over twitter today and roundly debunked. And as already pointed out here, the fucking email doesn't make any sense if you interpret it the way your masters have directed you to. If you read it with common sense (I know, tall order for you) then its very easy to see why you couldn't be more wrong. And also why it was very easily brushed aside as garbage by the members of the species with synaptic activity.
Click to expand...
Link to debunking?
 
Pens1566 said:
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/11/l...-clinton-hates-the-phrase-everyday-americans/

Or, you could, I don't know, read the email itself.
Click to expand...
So where is the debunking? She privately hates americans and he wants to publicly say she is their champion.

Debunking not found. Email stands. Interpretation: she hates americans, stands.

And on "everyday" could you please let me know what % that is? She doesn't connect with them (as she admitted), and that's obviously beyond just trump supporters. Since we like the play numbers games, care to put a %?

Just how many americans does she hate that she should represent?

I thought she wanted to be the representation for all?
 
LegendKiller said:
So where is the debunking? She privately hates americans and he wants to publicly say she is their champion.

Debunking not found. Email stands. Interpretation: she hates americans, stands.
Click to expand...

Is this one of those things like where you earlier admitted even when presented with evidence, you wouldn't believe it? Asking for a friend.

You can't even comprehend an email at this point. Ask yourself a question, if this were in fact true, wouldn't more than InfoWars/Breitbart/Random twitter egg named "Deplorable{insert name here}" be shouting about it? Again. Occam's razor.

Get help. Seriously.
 
LegendKiller said:
Link to debunking?
Click to expand...
Really?

You need that to be explained to you?

It's obviously saying that she hates the phrasing "everyday Americans" hence him saying that he still thinks that we should use it anyway.

"I know she has begun to hate everyday Americans, but I think we should use it once the first time she says I'm running for president because you and everyday Americans need a champion."
 
Pens1566 said:
Is this one of those things like where you earlier admitted even when presented with evidence, you wouldn't believe it? Asking for a friend.

You can't even comprehend an email at this point. Ask yourself a question, if this were in fact true, wouldn't more than InfoWars/Breitbart/Random twitter egg named "Deplorable{insert name here}" be shouting about it? Again. Occam's razor.

Get help. Seriously.
Click to expand...

His interpretation doesn't even make grammatical sense. It requires Podesta to be referring to plural everyday Americans as a singular 'it'.
 
WelshBloke said:
Really?

You need that to be explained to you?

It's obviously saying that she hates the phrasing "everyday Americans" hence him saying that he still thinks that we should use it anyway.

"I know she has begun to hate everyday Americans, but I think we should use it once the first time she says I'm running for president because you and everyday Americans need a champion."
Click to expand...

Yes, to normal functioning human brains that can reconcile "use it" with the PHRASE "everyday americans" it makes perfect sense. But, look who we're talking to here.
 
WelshBloke said:
Really?

You need that to be explained to you?

It's obviously saying that she hates the phrasing "everyday Americans" hence him saying that he still thinks that we should use it anyway.

"I know she has begun to hate everyday Americans, but I think we should use it once the first time she says I'm running for president because you and everyday Americans need a champion."
Click to expand...
Was it in quotes? I mean, since we are taking things out of context we should apply the same across the board.

The part of the first sentence clearly says she hates every day americans.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top