• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Trump audio from 2005 discussing women released. Brutal

Page 18 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
LMAO at you. Nope, you lose. We aren't talking about a lot of young men here talking in high school locker rooms, we are talking about:

* Donald Trump
* Who was a newlywed at the time of the recording
* Who had just married his third wife, Melania Knauss, that January
*Who at the time of the recording, was pregnant with Trump's youngest son, Barron.

Keep spinning your false equivalencies, it just makes you look like a bigger moron...
It also turns out that Trump tried to get Nancy O'Dell fired from hosting the Ms. USA pageant two years later, reportedly because she was pregnant at the time. Someone should ask Trump if he tried to fire her because she rejected his advances.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ell-trump-reportedly-tried-to-have-her-fired/
 
This whole election has just been one big laugh!

Shame that we get crap by default, but Trump is comedy gold.
 
I'm like disgusted with the world after reading my Republican friends and family members on social media.

there seems to be absolutely no awareness of the fact that the issue isn't the language -- who gives a shit what word Trump used? -- it's about condoning sexual assault and his overall dismissive attitude of women in general.
 
I'm like disgusted with the world after reading my Republican friends and family members on social media.

there seems to be absolutely no awareness of the fact that the issue isn't the language -- who gives a shit what word Trump used? -- it's about condoning sexual assault and his overall dismissive attitude of women in general.

Now we see what party is all high and mighty on morals.

You are projecting your victim hood.
 
Now we see what party is all high and mighty on morals.

You are projecting your victim hood.

LOL, so you would be cool if some person walked up and grabbed your package and tried to kiss you because they were rich?

Never mind that would be an insane amount of action for you. You probably would be cool with it.
 
Last edited:
Now we see what party is all high and mighty on morals.

You are projecting your victim hood.

Yeah, like, who gives a sweltering, overly sweaty and repugnant fuck if some fat hairy mutant molests women. Fucking whiners need to get with it or piss off out of the bronze age where we belong.
 
LOL, so you would be cool if some person walked up and grabbed your package and tried to kiss you because they were rich?

Never mind that would be an insane amount of action for you. You probably would be cool with it.
That's a silly question to ask a guy, because honestly most any guy would be okay with that if SHE were blazing hot. Or some guys only modestly hot. Dirt poor and blazing hot would be perfectly fine, rich not required but also okay.

Bad as Trump is, Dims defended Clinton over his womanizing and dismissed multiple sexual assualt victims of his. Slick Willie C just wasn't dumb enough to yap into an open mic about his proclivities.

Both sides get all up on a puritanical horse over the other side acting like predators. I find it amusing!
 
Morals are usually derived from a belief in God. Yes atheists can have morals and some do but a God fearing person is supposed to adhere to them above all else.

that's nonsense. If anything, a strong and total belief in god provides more justification for acting outright horribly. Yes, there is a certain incentive to not be punished after death if you are expected to "be good," but religious texts and customs have historically been championed to allow outright evil.

I don't know you and your concept of morals, but stoning a woman for being raped (Leviticus), as justified by Gawd, is pretty fucking amoral.

Then there's that whole millenia of slavery thing, because the rules of being a "moral slaveowner" are still rather clearly laid out by Gawd.
 
That's a silly question to ask a guy, because honestly most any guy would be okay with that if SHE were blazing hot. Or some guys only modestly hot. Dirt poor and blazing hot would be perfectly fine, rich not required but also okay.

Bad as Trump is, Dims defended Clinton over his womanizing and dismissed multiple sexual assualt victims of his. Slick Willie C just wasn't dumb enough to yap into an open mic about his proclivities.

Both sides get all up on a puritanical horse over the other side acting like predators. I find it amusing!

I said person not woman. Bonus points for the use of the term "Dims". Please go back to the kiddie table with Michal now.
 
That's a silly question to ask a guy, because honestly most any guy would be okay with that if SHE were blazing hot. Or some guys only modestly hot. Dirt poor and blazing hot would be perfectly fine, rich not required but also okay.

Bad as Trump is, Dims defended Clinton over his womanizing and dismissed multiple sexual assualt victims of his. Slick Willie C just wasn't dumb enough to yap into an open mic about his proclivities.

Both sides get all up on a puritanical horse over the other side acting like predators. I find it amusing!
On some level I agree with you.

I was more offended when Trump said if women are sexually harassed at work they should leave or get another career.
 
I said person not woman. Bonus points for the use of the term "Dims". Please go back to the kiddie table with Michal now.
Wait... women aren't people?

Your attempt a 'gotcha' was stupid leveled at a male... I explained why... but apparently you're not up on human social interaction enough to know why.
 
On some level I agree with you.

I was more offended when Trump said if women are sexually harassed at work they should leave or get another career.
Eh, Trump is just a guy who says whatever the fuck crosses his mind, and lives a life surrounded with 'yes' people that don't dare tell him he's a shithead because they want his money, or they want him to appear on some TV show.

He has no filter (up until now hasn't needed one) and doesn't care. Seeing the whole thing for what it actually is on Trump's part- one of if not THE biggest trolls of all time- this whole thing is nothing but a goof, so what's to be offended over?

I have to believe there's even BETTER stuff coming down the pike! I mean, if this was as bad as it gets, why not wait and surface the video way closer to the election?

I'm thinking there's probably way better stuff on the way that's reserved for that. More laffs yet to come?
 
Wait... women aren't people?

Your attempt a 'gotcha' was stupid leveled at a male... I explained why... but apparently you're not up on human social interaction enough to know why.

Michal's inability to ever imagine himself in someone else's shoes is what is stupid and you seem to be jumping on that with him. Have fun at the kiddie table.
 
Obviously he should have never said such things. They're offensive to women and makes him look bad. That doesn't mean that a lot of men haven't said the same or worse. I would wager that most men have mad very crude comments about women, but of course won't admit to it here. Making them hypocrites.

One side trying to slam the other over something that they're guilty of too is also pretty funny. Because Bill and Hillary haven't done and said bad things to women before? Raping, sexually assaulting, publicly humiliating them. But they're the good guys? People like them are why some women don't report rape or sexual assault. Its amazing how the left is ok with their behavior, while ragging on what Trump said, while Bill actually did it.



Yeah... 100 million copies sold of the book about men treating woman badly and using them for sex. Who buys most of these... ? Women. Its ok if in a book or movie, people eat it up, say it for real and its a problem. More hypocritical viewpoints.

I suspect you would have a different opinion if trump were your girlfriend's boss and this is how he acts around her.

Morals are usually derived from a belief in God. Yes atheists can have morals and some do but a God fearing person is supposed to adhere to them above all else.

What would Jesus think of how trump treats women?
 
That's a silly question to ask a guy, because honestly most any guy would be okay with that if SHE were blazing hot. Or some guys only modestly hot. Dirt poor and blazing hot would be perfectly fine, rich not required but also okay.

Bad as Trump is, Dims defended Clinton over his womanizing and dismissed multiple sexual assualt victims of his. Slick Willie C just wasn't dumb enough to yap into an open mic about his proclivities.

Both sides get all up on a puritanical horse over the other side acting like predators. I find it amusing!

It makes sense that people who identify more with trump find it hard to understand that some guys get sex by being on good terms with women.
 
So both sides are claiming women were sexually assaulted by the other. Far as I know only one woman has testified to being attacked in court and that's Trump's first wife.

Anyone remember Ken Starr did an exhaustive investigation into Bill Clinton? I don't remember him recommending charges being filed or Bill Clinton committed assault.
 
So both sides are claiming women were sexually assaulted by the other. Far as I know only one woman has testified to being attacked in court and that's Trump's first wife.

Anyone remember Ken Starr did an exhaustive investigation into Bill Clinton? I don't remember him recommending charges being filed or Bill Clinton committed assault.

Ivana actually claimed he raped her in their divorce proceedings. And there's one other active case against Trump for the 13yr old.

One of the women trotted out by Trump in that fake press conference last night is actually on record testifying that Clinton did not assault her. It's part of a subpoena in the Paula Jones case. So, sworn testimony.
 
Rasmussen has the first post-pussygate poll out today... Clinton +7 (45/38).

the previous Rasmussen (Friday) had Clinton/Trump basically tied at 43/42.

you may remember Rasmussen as the polls that lean so heavily Republican that they were calling for a Romney victory in 2012
 
Back
Top