Trojan ranks colleges on sexual health

[Queasy]

Link

PRINCETON, N.J., Sept. 10 /PRNewswire/ -- The makers of Trojan brand
condoms today released their 2007 Sexual Health Report Card, the second
annual ranking of sexual health resources at American colleges and
universities. The study, conducted by Sperling's BestPlaces on behalf of
Trojan, finds a lack of access to information and resources may prevent
some students from being sexually healthy.
This year's report card arrives in the wake of Trojan's "Evolve"
campaign (http://www.trojanevolve.com), a multimedia effort aimed at redefining
the national dialogue on sexual health with an emphasis on responsible
behavior and partners' respect for one another.
In total, 139 colleges and universities representing each state and
major NCAA Division I athletic conference were reviewed. Placing first and
second, the University of Minnesota and University of Wyoming demonstrated
"well- evolved" sexual health programs and were the most sexually healthy
schools according to the study. While Ohio State and the University of
Florida may have recently triumphed in sports, the Trojan Report Card
indicates their sexual health programs have room to improve, as OSU and UF
ranked 26th and 43rd, respectively.
Researchers polled student health centers and reviewed their websites
to assign a grade point average (GPA) for sexual health resources across 11
separate categories:
-- Sexual health awareness programs
-- Condom & contraception availability
-- HIV testing
-- Other Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) testing
-- Student health center hours of operation
-- Drop-in vs. appointment-based service
-- Navigability and usability of Web-based sexual health information
-- Anonymous advice / newspaper columns
-- Lecture outreach programs
-- Student peer groups
-- Sexual assault programs

...

Highest- and Lowest-Ranked Schools
1. University of Minnesota (GPA 3.91)
2. University of Wyoming (GPA 3.91)
3. University of Washington (GPA 3.73)
4. Rutgers University (GPA 3.68)
5. Purdue University (GPA 3.64)

135. Villanova University (GPA 1.45)
136. University of Arkansas (GPA 1.36)
137. Arkansas State University (GPA 1.14)
138. University of Louisiana (GPA 0.91)
139. Louisiana Tech University (GPA 0.82)

Click through for the complete rankings (at the bottom).

 

[Kev]

I better stay away from the Nova chicks then...

 

[evident]

Originally posted by: Kev
I better stay away from the Nova chicks then...

i think i can safely say that rutgers girls are 10000% skankier than anyone you would find at nova.... it's been said that their campus has its own std variants :laugh:

i think the only reason why they rank nova so low is that they don't offer their contraceptives on campus, but all of those other services are available and widely advertised.

 

[Bibble]

Originally posted by: evident

Originally posted by: Kev
I better stay away from the Nova chicks then...

i think i can safely say that rutgers girls are 10000% skankier than anyone you would find at nova.... it's been said that their campus has its own std variants :laugh:

i think the only reason why they rank nova so low is that they don't offer their contraceptives on campus, but all of those other services are available and widely advertised.

Rutgers does have its own STD, it's called "Rutgers". It even sounds bad.

 

[AgaBoogaBoo]

#5

 

[mwmorph]

Damn, my school dropped off from 10 to 29. Time to be a bit more careful about Foxtrot Uniform Charlie Kilo'ing.

Oh and Agaboogaboo, Purdue is only so high because of the lack of women.

 

[SpanishFry]

Wow, #13!

I thought we might be low.

Hot girls + party school known for boozing = bad combo most of the time.

 

[Hyperlite]

59?! and how the hell is ECSTDU #9? ok, i declare that study bunk.

 

[Toastedlightly]

We win! (UofMinnesota student). And to attest to condom availability.. health advocate down the hall. Lube + condoms free ftw!

 

[mrkun]

Wow, UCLA is 81. How can UCLA be worse than U. Alabama???

 

[Queasy]

Originally posted by: mrkun
Wow, UCLA is 81. How can UCLA be worse than U. Alabama???

<chuckle> There are 79 other schools that UCLA is worse than as well.

 

[sthaznpride17]

Hooray for UofWashington

 

[AgaBoogaBoo]

Originally posted by: mwmorph
Damn, my school dropped off from 10 to 29. Time to be a bit more careful about Foxtrot Uniform Charlie Kilo'ing.

Oh and Agaboogaboo, Purdue is only so high because of the lack of women.

Who says you need women? :Q

 

[mrkun]

Originally posted by: Queasy

Originally posted by: mrkun
Wow, UCLA is 81. How can UCLA be worse than U. Alabama???

<chuckle> There are 79 other schools that UCLA is worse than as well.

Obviously. But I mean, how can the premier university of Los Angeles be ranked below so many colleges in the deep South?

 

[Queasy]

Originally posted by: mrkun

Originally posted by: Queasy

Originally posted by: mrkun
Wow, UCLA is 81. How can UCLA be worse than U. Alabama???

<chuckle> There are 79 other schools that UCLA is worse than as well.

Obviously. But I mean, how can the premier university of Los Angeles be ranked below so many colleges in the deep South?

:roll: Well gollllllie, you know us folks down here don' have much ta worry about when it comes ta sexual health. Datin' our sisters and cousins keeps us plenty healthy between our banjo sessions and tobacca spittin' contests.

Pick a category on why the premier university of Los Angeles is so far behind all those backwards schools from the south:
-- Sexual health awareness programs
-- Condom & contraception availability
-- HIV testing
-- Other Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) testing
-- Student health center hours of operation
-- Drop-in vs. appointment-based service
-- Navigability and usability of Web-based sexual health information
-- Anonymous advice / newspaper columns
-- Lecture outreach programs
-- Student peer groups
-- Sexual assault programs

 

[BornStar]

Originally posted by: AgaBoogaBoo
#5

Hail Purdue!

 

[Journer]

from 71 to 80...bring on da freshmen hotties!

 

[2Xtreme21]

Pitt is 66th.

 

[Canai]

marked for home

 

[ViviTheMage]

niiiiiiiiiiiice #1 baby

 

[Aharami]

Originally posted by: evident

Originally posted by: Kev
I better stay away from the Nova chicks then...

i think i can safely say that rutgers girls are 10000% skankier than anyone you would find at nova.... it's been said that their campus has its own std variants :laugh:

i think the only reason why they rank nova so low is that they don't offer their contraceptives on campus, but all of those other services are available and widely advertised.

its not called Slutgers for a reason, ya know!

 

[SpanishFry]

Originally posted by: mrkun

Originally posted by: Queasy

Originally posted by: mrkun
Wow, UCLA is 81. How can UCLA be worse than U. Alabama???

<chuckle> There are 79 other schools that UCLA is worse than as well.

Obviously. But I mean, how can the premier university of Los Angeles be ranked below so many colleges in the deep South?

latin gangbangs


yeah, i said it

 

[mrkun]

Originally posted by: SpanishFry

Originally posted by: mrkun

Originally posted by: Queasy

Originally posted by: mrkun
Wow, UCLA is 81. How can UCLA be worse than U. Alabama???

<chuckle> There are 79 other schools that UCLA is worse than as well.

Obviously. But I mean, how can the premier university of Los Angeles be ranked below so many colleges in the deep South?

latin gangbangs


yeah, i said it

Latinos are a very small percentage of the UC population; so I don't think that's it.

 

[mrkun]

Originally posted by: Queasy

Originally posted by: mrkun

Originally posted by: Queasy

Originally posted by: mrkun
Wow, UCLA is 81. How can UCLA be worse than U. Alabama???

<chuckle> There are 79 other schools that UCLA is worse than as well.

Obviously. But I mean, how can the premier university of Los Angeles be ranked below so many colleges in the deep South?

:roll: Well gollllllie, you know us folks down here don' have much ta worry about when it comes ta sexual health. Datin' our sisters and cousins keeps us plenty healthy between our banjo sessions and tobacca spittin' contests.

Ah, that would explain it.

 

[mrkun]

deleted