• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Translator in eye of storm on retroactive classification

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/07/05/translator_in_eye_of_storm_on_retroactive_classification/
WASHINGTON -- Sifting through old classified materials in the days after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, FBI translator Sibel Edmonds said, she made an alarming discovery: Intercepts relevant to the terrorist plot, including references to skyscrapers, had been overlooked because they were badly translated into English.

Edmonds, 34, who is fluent in Turkish and Farsi, said she quickly reported the mistake to an FBI superior. Five months later, after flagging what she said were several other security lapses in her division, she was fired. Now, after more than two years of investigations and congressional inquiries, Edmonds is at the center of an extraordinary storm over US classification rules that sheds new light on the secrecy imperative supported by members of the Bush administration.

In a rare maneuver, Attorney General John Ashcroft has ordered that information about the Edmonds case be retroactively classified, even basic facts that have been posted on websites and discussed openly in meetings with members of Congress for two years. The Department of Justice also invoked the seldom-used ''state secrets" privilege to silence Edmonds in court. She has been blocked from testifying in a lawsuit brought by victims of the Sept. 11 attacks and was allowed to speak to the panel investigating the Sept. 11 attacks only behind closed doors.

Meanwhile, the FBI has yet to release its internal investigation into her charges. And the Senate Judiciary Committee, which oversees the bureau, has been stymied in its attempt to get to the bottom of her allegations. Now that the case has been retroactively classified, lawmakers are wary of discussing the details, for fear of overstepping legal bounds.

''I'm alarmed that the FBI is reaching back in time and classifying information it provided two years ago," Senator Charles E. Grassley, a Republican from Iowa and a leading advocate for Edmonds, said last Friday. ''Frankly, it looks like an attempt to impede legitimate oversight of a serious problem at the FBI."

Edmonds, a naturalized US citizen who grew up in Turkey and Iran, said in an interview last week that the ordeal has made her grow disillusioned with the ''magical system of checks and balances and separation of powers" that had made her so drawn to the United States. ''What I came to see is that it exists only in name," Edmonds said. ''Where is the oversight? Who is there to stop him [Ashcroft]?"

In a development that legal analysts say is disturbing, a pattern of retroactive classifications has begun to emerge in recent years, all of them pertaining to -- but not limited to -- national security. For example, Representative John F. Tierney, Democrat of Massachusetts, is locked in an ongoing battle with the Defense Department over testing requirements for a national missile defense system that were made public in 2000 but have since been declared classified. Continued...
 

T2T III

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,899
1
0
I personally don't see any issue with keeping some of this classified. There are lots of reasons for keeping something classified. However, there are those who believe in conspiracy theories and would love to blame Bush and Ashcroft. However, when they get their wish and Kerry gets elected, we can all wait and see if he'll de-classify this information.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Sounds peachy, T2T, but there's one catch- retroactive classification obviously can't work, and the subject matter is more an issue of accountability than of national defense. Its not exactly nuclear weapon secrets we're talking about, more like potentially embarassing information that might threaten the re-election of the current regime...

Openness and accountability are the hallmarks of a free society and honest govt. To paraphrase Justice Stevens, our govt must not be allowed to use the tools of tyranny even to fight tyranny, and secrecy is one of those tools...
 

Hossenfeffer

Diamond Member
Jul 16, 2000
7,462
1
0
Justified or no, the retroactive classification is just bad ju-ju. Here's to the Edmonds woman's story getting whatever justice is truly deserved, good or bad.