Originally posted by: ayabe
Originally posted by: evident
honda owns all
Honda sucks even worse. They went from being at the forefront of engine technology in the 90's to sagging behind just about everyone, including Ford and GM.
Um....what?
Ford, in all fairness, is currently using derivatives of the Mazda MZR inline-four (A.K.A. Duratec) engines in many of their cars - and Mazda engines have always been ahead of the curve. (The Protege had continuously variable valve timing long before many other cars). GM's Ecotec line, on the other hand, still is less efficient and less powerful than their Honda counterparts - just compare the Civic to the Saturn Astra. And then there's the Vue, which is, interestingly enough, sold with a Honda V6.
My parents have a CRV. It is endlessly reliable (nearing six years old with not a single problem!), incredibly safe (I was in the passenger seat when someone plowed into the right side at high speed....and walked right out!), and surprisingly efficient (30.8MPG over a 400 mile highway trip is my father's record.)
Before this, my father bought Acura Integra. Even at ten years of age, the car worked flawlessly. It wasn't even rusty. Sure, the cloth seats had had better days...but it was !@#$ old!
That said, there are some real dogs coming out of Japan, too - notably the Nissan Versa, which was rated below even the awful Chevrolet (technically Daewoo) Aveo in reliability, and numerous deathtrap Suzukis including the gas-guzzling Grand Vitara.
Toyotas are, as many others in this thread have stated, white goods. They are for people who hate driving and want to put as little money and thought into it as possible. As such, they are unpleasant to sit in and inexpensive to buy. Hondas are a little better, though the elimination of the double-A-arm front and independent rear suspension in the Civics of old is a bit disappointing. Which is why I would recommend buying a Mazda instead.