As I've pointed out before, in 2007 there was ONLY about a 10% difference between NA cars or Toyonda, for cars that are 15 years old or built in 1992 'remember, the crappy days of NA cars'
In fact in 2000 for cars made in 1985, NA manufacture was BETTER than foreign cars.
All cars today are pretty good and I'd buy most, cept German ,cause I'm still not convinced parts and maintenanace won't eat me alive.
http://www.thestar.com/Business/article/278820
In 2007, of 15-year-old passenger cars that remained on the road ,research found that the number had climbed to 43 per cent.
Among nameplates, the research showed the survival rate for vehicles older than 15 years from offshore-based manufacturers including Toyota and Honda had shot up to 53.9 per cent last year from 30.5 per cent in 2000.
North American-based General Motors, Ford and Chrysler also had improved their survival rate for those aging vehicles to 43.7 per cent from 35.2 per cent in the same period.
DesRosiers said if there had been research in 1990 for 15-year-old vehicles, it would have been newsworthy if more than 15 per cent of such autos were still on the road.
"Never before have we seen such compelling large-scale evidence of improved long-term durability regardless of nameplate origin, country of manufacture or class of vehicle," said DesRosiers, president of DesRosiers Automotive Consultants.