- Dec 18, 2010
- 18,811
- 197
- 106
I thought Canadians were liberal? Why would they elect a moderate conservative to replace a crack smoking mayor?
Isn't tolerance one of the core values of liberalism? If you are tolerant, why vote for the opposite of mayor Ford? Surely smoking crack played no factor with the liberal voters, right?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...tion-standing-place-cancer-suffering-Rob.html
As I have posted before, everyone is a bigot. With some people we just have to dig a little deeper. With the case of Ford, smoking crack was probably the limit on what liberals will tolerate.
If you consider yourself a liberal, where do you think your limits are at? Would you vote for Ford if he ran again? If not why not?
If you are a liberal and would not vote for ford, do you consider yourself a bigot because you are discriminating against someone with a drug problem?
Isn't tolerance one of the core values of liberalism? If you are tolerant, why vote for the opposite of mayor Ford? Surely smoking crack played no factor with the liberal voters, right?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...tion-standing-place-cancer-suffering-Rob.html
Frail cancer-stricken Rob Ford is replaced by conservative family man as Mayor of Toronto: Notorious crack-smoker bows out as brother fails to succeed him
As I have posted before, everyone is a bigot. With some people we just have to dig a little deeper. With the case of Ford, smoking crack was probably the limit on what liberals will tolerate.
If you consider yourself a liberal, where do you think your limits are at? Would you vote for Ford if he ran again? If not why not?
If you are a liberal and would not vote for ford, do you consider yourself a bigot because you are discriminating against someone with a drug problem?
Last edited: