- Mar 20, 2000
- 102,408
- 8,596
- 126
Originally posted by: dainthomas
Originally posted by: Platypus
the 00's need a good gay recruitment film to stand behind, I support this.
I thought that's what LOTR was?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxuZuXPouqM
Originally posted by: dainthomas
Originally posted by: Platypus
the 00's need a good gay recruitment film to stand behind, I support this.
I thought that's what LOTR was?
Originally posted by: dainthomas
Originally posted by: Platypus
the 00's need a good gay recruitment film to stand behind, I support this.
I thought that's what LOTR was?
Originally posted by: Aquaman
I never saw the first one ........ so I would not watch this one
Cheers,
Aquaman [child of the 80's]
Originally posted by: UglyCasanova
Sounds cool, but the more I think about it...
What made Top Gun? Tom Cruise? Nicole Kidman? No, the F-14 made Top Gun. If Maverick is in the F-22 it just won't be the same. Don't get me wrong, the plane is sexy and damn impressive, but the F-14 is one of the sexiest planes ever made. It had just the right curves to make it so visually appealing (and great for the silver screen). On top of that the script I'm sure is just churned out so they could put the Top Gun name on it, not because it is actually any good.
I would love to see Top Gun 2 if made right, but I doubt that would happen.
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: UglyCasanova
Sounds cool, but the more I think about it...
What made Top Gun? Tom Cruise? Nicole Kidman? No, the F-14 made Top Gun. If Maverick is in the F-22 it just won't be the same. Don't get me wrong, the plane is sexy and damn impressive, but the F-14 is one of the sexiest planes ever made. It had just the right curves to make it so visually appealing (and great for the silver screen). On top of that the script I'm sure is just churned out so they could put the Top Gun name on it, not because it is actually any good.
I would love to see Top Gun 2 if made right, but I doubt that would happen.
1. Nicole Kidman wasn't in Top Gun.
2. Top Gun is about the Navy. There are no F-22's in the Navy and they can't take off from carriers. It would rip their landing gear right off.
Originally posted by: Nyati13
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: UglyCasanova
Sounds cool, but the more I think about it...
What made Top Gun? Tom Cruise? Nicole Kidman? No, the F-14 made Top Gun. If Maverick is in the F-22 it just won't be the same. Don't get me wrong, the plane is sexy and damn impressive, but the F-14 is one of the sexiest planes ever made. It had just the right curves to make it so visually appealing (and great for the silver screen). On top of that the script I'm sure is just churned out so they could put the Top Gun name on it, not because it is actually any good.
I would love to see Top Gun 2 if made right, but I doubt that would happen.
1. Nicole Kidman wasn't in Top Gun.
2. Top Gun is about the Navy. There are no F-22's in the Navy and they can't take off from carriers. It would rip their landing gear right off.
It would be SuperBugs these days... ( The F-18E Super Hornet ).... Possibly it might use F-35s, but that would all be CGI...
He?s too big and too perfect a star
Originally posted by: marvdmartian
He?s too big and too perfect a star
Wow, the clown that wrote that blog isn't any sort of fan, are they?? :roll:
Hey, maybe they could make it Top Gun in Space?? Then Tom could eat the evil planets!!![]()
Originally posted by: Injury
The movie's main villain will be Goose. Turns out, he didn't really die and he's pissed as hell because Maverick abandoned him in the water.
