Delita
Senior member
- Jan 12, 2006
- 931
- 0
- 76
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Gun deaths per 100,000 in Japan in 2007:
0.7
Gun deaths per 100,000 in the US in 2007:
7.07
Well I don't think this statistic is fair because it makes it seem like deaths only come through guns. OF COURSE in a society where it is banned you will have substantially lower deaths due to guns. The question is if many of these deaths get shifted to other areas.
However, what this statistic should really show to us is that in a society where guns are banned, you still have about ~1000 shootings a year. This shows that if a criminal really wants a gun, they WILL find a way to get a hold of one. Is it worth it to ban guns for the safety of society? Its a slippery slope, and one I'd prefer we do not go down because the same rationale can be used to limit our own freedoms to protect us against the "TerrA4ists"
I already addressed that. Even when you put in the general murder rate per 100,000 compared to the US in a regression table, you still end up with a statistically significant difference. So no, the deaths are not all shifted to other places.
I'm a firm believer in the 2nd amendment even though I would never ever own a gun. (I feel like if you want people to respect the parts of the bill of rights that I value, I have to respect the ones I don't like) As someone else said though, this situation is hardly a convincing pro-gun argument.
Actually you said:
If you plug it into a regression with the overall murder rate between Japan and the US you will still find a significantly lower rate of gun deaths.