[Tom's] Haswell uses "20nm" technology

NTMBK

Lifer
Nov 14, 2011
10,466
5,852
136
Also:

"Haswell represents an update to Intel's instruction set architecture which it delivers every two years."

Oh dear, oh dear.
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,896
4,878
136
For the uninformed general public it make sense , or at least
they could hardly dismiss anything...
 

inf64

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2011
3,884
4,692
136
Well Haswell adds AVX2 and FMA3 so it is an update on ISA support front too.
 
Aug 11, 2008
10,451
642
126
Also:

"Haswell represents an update to Intel's instruction set architecture which it delivers every two years."

Oh dear, oh dear.

He must have meant the tick/tock cycle. Every two years is a "tock" which includes new architecture and one would assume new instructions as well.
 

inf64

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2011
3,884
4,692
136
But by that logic, Ivy Bridge also counts as it added the 16-bit float conversion instructions.
Sure, but Haswell's ISA extensions are major updates that required some big changes in the design.
 

Haserath

Senior member
Sep 12, 2010
793
1
81
Also:

"Haswell represents an update to Intel's instruction set architecture which it delivers every two years."

Oh dear, oh dear.

Haswell is the tock. Intel states that to be their uarch update, just like Nehalem and SB.

Ivy Bridge didn't receive any extensive changes, at least nothing compared to their tocks.
 

NTMBK

Lifer
Nov 14, 2011
10,466
5,852
136
Haswell is the tock. Intel states that to be their uarch update, just like Nehalem and SB.

Ivy Bridge didn't receive any extensive changes, at least nothing compared to their tocks.

If he meant "tock", he should have said "tock". Instead he tried to make it sound more precise and technical, and in the process he got it wrong. Any chip with new instructions is an adjustment to Intel's ISA, not just their tocks.
 

Idontcare

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
21,110
64
91
What happened to tom anyways?

The standard cycle when a small journalism business is bought out by a big media conglomerate...the focus and corporate culture is centered on churning page views and driving ad revenue, quality of the articles and considerations for the reader fall way down the list of priorities.
 

CakeMonster

Golden Member
Nov 22, 2012
1,636
814
136
If I remember correctly, I think I read that Tom was doing something completely different already 10 years ago.
 

Harabec

Golden Member
Oct 15, 2005
1,369
1
81
The standard cycle when a small journalism business is bought out by a big media conglomerate...the focus and corporate culture is centered on churning page views and driving ad revenue, quality of the articles and considerations for the reader fall way down the list of priorities.

I see this happening all the time, yet find it funny that those big corps never wisen up and see the trend. Whatever they just bought ends up as garbage after a few years.
Perhaps that is the intention? they made the money, it can be left to rot.
 

Ayah

Platinum Member
Jan 1, 2006
2,512
1
81
Well, the point of business is to make money.. not to contribute useful things.
The only thing you can do is to avoid the site altogether.
 

Maximilian

Lifer
Feb 8, 2004
12,604
15
81
The standard cycle when a small journalism business is bought out by a big media conglomerate...the focus and corporate culture is centered on churning page views and driving ad revenue, quality of the articles and considerations for the reader fall way down the list of priorities.

Yeah, i mean the guy though, when i first went there ~2003 i remember there being a tom at toms hardware.
 

Idontcare

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
21,110
64
91
Yeah, i mean the guy though, when i first went there ~2003 i remember there being a tom at toms hardware.

Tom Pabst was still there then, but he cashed his check and has long since moved on. (he was a medical doctor after all, before and during the time he had his hobby of hosting TomsHardwareGuide)

The site itself has been sold at least twice over now.

In a lot of ways it is the same sort of transition that private business undergoes when it does an IPO.

Like there was an Anand at Anandtech.

Anand is still very much firmly present and in control of Anandtech. He is not as present as say Kyle of [H] but he is very much one of the few remaining originals of the hardware-review era.
 

schmuckley

Platinum Member
Aug 18, 2011
2,335
1
0
Tom's is tawded :D
I like to post there when I'm feeling ornery.
They banned me from Tom's for overclocking ..
arthurh has banned you (Section : all)

Reason of the sanction : This is the Overclocking section, not Extreme Overclocking. The info accepted is what the MFG lists in their products specs. Your OC'n is more than the regular users here at THGF do and they can not afford to waste CPUs.
still worth an LOL :D
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,304
16,134
136
Tom's is tawded :D

Reason of the sanction : This is the Overclocking section, not Extreme Overclocking. The info accepted is what the MFG lists in their products specs. Your OC'n is more than the regular users here at THGF do and they can not afford to waste CPUs.
still worth an LOL :D

Wow. If that's a quote, you can be sure that will never happen here.
 

Ajay

Lifer
Jan 8, 2001
16,094
8,114
136
Tom Pabst was still there then, but he cashed his check and has long since moved on. (he was a medical doctor after all, before and during the time he had his hobby of hosting TomsHardwareGuide)

The site itself has been sold at least twice over now.

In a lot of ways it is the same sort of transition that private business undergoes when it does an IPO.



Anand is still very much firmly present and in control of Anandtech. He is not as present as say Kyle of [H] but he is very much one of the few remaining originals of the hardware-review era.

Dang you have a good memory - that or some awesome google-fu skills ;)