Originally posted by: neutralizer
I just don't think Seinfield is funny. As for the comedies that I watch, I enjoy The Office, Futurama, and Family Guy.
Originally posted by: DonVito
To me the defining characteristic of Seinfeld, and what I love most about it, is its total amorality. I remember seeing an interview with Larry David where he talked about how he and Jerry sat down when they created the show and decided there would never be a "very special Seinfeld." The characters would never learn anything from their experiences, and would continue to be completely shallow and self-absorbed from episode to episode. There would never be a moral to the story.
To me, Seinfeld is a pure comedy in way that is essentially unprecedented. The preachy, faux-emotional episodes of MASH and Frasier are, IMO, completely phony and lame (they're kind of the power ballads of situational comedy). Seinfeld, on the other hand, is the real deal - pure booze, no mixer.
As I said in the other Seinfeld thread, I really can't respect an adult who dislikes Seinfeld. That is kind of a deal-breaker for me.
Originally posted by: Dean
Originally posted by: neutralizer
I just don't think Seinfield is funny. As for the comedies that I watch, I enjoy The Office, Futurama, and Family Guy.
None of those shows have anything on Seinfeld. The Office is meh. The others well, while funny, offered the same every episode
That's one of the reasons that I can't really respect an adult who likes Seinfeld. To just continuously make the same mistakes, scenarios, etc. detracts all credibility - but maybe that was one of the points that they were going after.Originally posted by: DonVito
To me the defining characteristic of Seinfeld, and what I love most about it, is its total amorality. I remember seeing an interview with Larry David where he talked about how he and Jerry sat down when they created the show and decided there would never be a "very special Seinfeld." The characters would never learn anything from their experiences, and would continue to be completely shallow and self-absorbed from episode to episode. There would never be a moral to the story.
To me, Seinfeld is a pure comedy in way that is essentially unprecedented. The preachy, faux-emotional episodes of MASH and Frasier are, IMO, completely phony and lame (they're kind of the power ballads of situational comedy). Seinfeld, on the other hand, is the real deal - pure booze, no mixer.
As I said in the other Seinfeld thread, I really can't respect an adult who dislikes Seinfeld. That is kind of a deal-breaker for me.
It was your post in the other thread that got me to post this thread. Although, I still repect people that dislike Seinfeld, I don't understand them.Originally posted by: DonVito
To me the defining characteristic of Seinfeld, and what I love most about it, is its total amorality. I remember seeing an interview with Larry David where he talked about how he and Jerry sat down when they created the show and decided there would never be a "very special Seinfeld." The characters would never learn anything from their experiences, and would continue to be completely shallow and self-absorbed from episode to episode. There would never be a moral to the story.
To me, Seinfeld is a pure comedy in way that is essentially unprecedented. The preachy, faux-emotional episodes of MASH and Frasier are, IMO, completely phony and lame (they're kind of the power ballads of situational comedy). Seinfeld, on the other hand, is the real deal - pure booze, no mixer.
As I said in the other Seinfeld thread, I really can't respect an adult who dislikes Seinfeld. That is kind of a deal-breaker for me.
Originally posted by: DonVito
To me the defining characteristic of Seinfeld, and what I love most about it, is its total amorality. I remember seeing an interview with Larry David where he talked about how he and Jerry sat down when they created the show and decided there would never be a "very special Seinfeld." The characters would never learn anything from their experiences, and would continue to be completely shallow and self-absorbed from episode to episode. There would never be a moral to the story.
Originally posted by: Squisher
It was your post in the other thread that got me to post this thread. Although, I still repect people that dislike Seinfeld, I don't understand them.Originally posted by: DonVito
To me the defining characteristic of Seinfeld, and what I love most about it, is its total amorality. I remember seeing an interview with Larry David where he talked about how he and Jerry sat down when they created the show and decided there would never be a "very special Seinfeld." The characters would never learn anything from their experiences, and would continue to be completely shallow and self-absorbed from episode to episode. There would never be a moral to the story.
To me, Seinfeld is a pure comedy in way that is essentially unprecedented. The preachy, faux-emotional episodes of MASH and Frasier are, IMO, completely phony and lame (they're kind of the power ballads of situational comedy). Seinfeld, on the other hand, is the real deal - pure booze, no mixer.
As I said in the other Seinfeld thread, I really can't respect an adult who dislikes Seinfeld. That is kind of a deal-breaker for me.
Originally posted by: dug777
I can't see any rationality behind liking a show simply because it's 'groundbreaking'. That's totally inane, somewhat like prefering a Model-T to a 2006 Lexus because the Model-T was so amazingly original
I dislike the show because it's crude, inane, and often painfully forced humour IMHO. Nobody could fail to get it, because they flog every joke & silly situation to death.
If you can't respect me for having my own opinion about something, that's remarkably closed minded & parochial![]()
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: dug777
I can't see any rationality behind liking a show simply because it's 'groundbreaking'. That's totally inane, somewhat like prefering a Model-T to a 2006 Lexus because the Model-T was so amazingly original
I dislike the show because it's crude, inane, and often painfully forced humour IMHO. Nobody could fail to get it, because they flog every joke & silly situation to death.
If you can't respect me for having my own opinion about something, that's remarkably closed minded & parochial![]()
Game....set....match....Don Vito.
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Not fan of social commentary with your comedy?
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Not fan of social commentary with your comedy?
Not at all. MASH was a decent show and during the Trapper John/Henry Blake years it was quite funny. After that it sucked and it went on for what? 3 times as long as the Korean War?
Not nearly as good as Seinfeld.
Originally posted by: DonVito
To me the defining characteristic of Seinfeld, and what I love most about it, is its total amorality. I remember seeing an interview with Larry David where he talked about how he and Jerry sat down when they created the show and decided there would never be a "very special Seinfeld." The characters would never learn anything from their experiences, and would continue to be completely shallow and self-absorbed from episode to episode. There would never be a moral to the story.
To me, Seinfeld is a pure comedy in way that is essentially unprecedented. The preachy, faux-emotional episodes of MASH and Frasier are, IMO, completely phony and lame (they're kind of the power ballads of situational comedy). Seinfeld, on the other hand, is the real deal - pure booze, no mixer.
As I said in the other Seinfeld thread, I really can't respect an adult who dislikes Seinfeld. That is kind of a deal-breaker for me.
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Not fan of social commentary with your comedy?
Not at all. MASH was a decent show and during the Trapper John/Henry Blake years it was quite funny. After that it sucked and it went on for what? 3 times as long as the Korean War?
Not nearly as good as Seinfeld.
In its later years, MASH was SO painfully formulaic that I find the later shows almost unwatchable. Week in, week out, it was a repetitive, manipulative blend of 24 minutes of family-friendly comedy and p6 minutes of preachiness about the horrors of war. Meh. As I said, the reason I admire Seinfeld is its purity of vision - they never felt any obligation to preach, and in fact they deliberately avoided it.
Originally posted by: dug777
And because of this admiration, you feel nothing but contempt for those who can't stand it? :roll:
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: dug777
And because of this admiration, you feel nothing but contempt for those who can't stand it? :roll:
I don't recall using the word "contempt." I said I don't really respect anyone who actively dislikes Seinfeld. That was probably a poor choice of words - what I meant is that I don't think I could really get along with such a person.
Seinfeld is the smartest, funniest live-action sitcom ever broadcast in the United States IMO (the other shows that I see as being of a similar caliber are the UK Office and Fawlty Towers, though the brief Police Squad! series might qualify as well), and I have a hard time understanding how anyone with a fully-developed sense of humor could fail to appreciate it. That doesn't necessarily make them bad people, just people I have a very hard time relating to. I guess I'd say the same thing about someone who disliked The Sopranos, the movie Adaptation, and some other works of art. It just suggests I have little common ground with them.
