Really dont understand what you are saying.
I work in the automotive industry, have a look at the MSRP of new cars today.
This analogy doesn't work at all. First of all, modern cars not only offer superior performance and efficiency, but they are safer, larger (while often lighter) and have a lot more features we
actually use. Most of the new features in GPUs (TrueAudio or Voxel Global Illumination Lighting) are useless marketing gimmicks. Second of all, a car is a necessity for many people every single day. Not everyone plays videogames every day. Thirdly, more than 1 family member can benefit from a great car either as a secondary driver or passenger(s), but it's unlikely 2-3 people are gaming on your rig.
Cars also have decent resale values 5 years from purchase date and safe cars save lives, while in 5 years a GPU is worth about 20% or less of its MSRP and GPU does very little to impact the
quality of your life. In other words, if you downgraded from the S-Class to a Honda Accord for every day commute that's > 30 min, that would be a huge difference (downgrade) in life-style vs. downgrading from a Titan X to a 970/R9 290X.
Finally, car manufacturers did not increase prices 50-100% over 1-2 generations. The increases are gradual. However, GTX560Ti $249 became $500/550 680/980 while GTX280/480/580 $499 became $699 780Ti/$999 Titan X. NV effectively
doubled the prices of mid-range and high-end cards in a period of 3 years since GTX680 launched. In order to get great value now, one must either wait for AMD to force NV to drop prices OR wait for the 2nd half of a generation when NV finally releases the "true" flagship GM200 6GB card for $599-649.
IMO, the marginal utility of a car is far higher for most people than a videocard. The same goes for a cell phone. I would have little reservation about spending $45-50K on a new C-Class or Audi S4 as an example, or $600-750 on a Samsung S6/iPhone 6S+, but there is
no way I am dropping $1-2K on dual Titan Xs. It's not that I can't afford it, just the value for me is not there to get ripped off so badly (imo) just to have the best cards for 3-4 months for bragging rights. I feel the difference between a $200 LG G2 and a $600 S6 is easily worth the extra $400 but there is no way I would feel a $1K Titan X is worth $400-500 over R9 390 noX/GM200 6GB with only 10-15% less performance.
Another evidence that GPU prices are rising is the awful increase in price/performance of cards like GTX960 over R9 280X/GTX760, or the awful price/performance GTX750Ti has over R9 270X. The reality is a GTX980 should be a $299 videocard, maybe with inflation a $349 one, but it's $550! Think of it another way -- this entire forum cried when AMD launched HD7970 for $550 less than 1.5 years from GTX580's launch. HD7970 OC
leveled a GTX580 OC by
48-80%, all for only $100 more. WOW! Now it took a mind-blowing
3 years for Titan X to double HD7970Ghz but NV is asking DOUBLE the MSRP of a 7970; and Titan X can't even mine a single bitcoin. That's laughable if you ask me but it's not as if this forum is ripping the Titan X apart like they did with the 7970. 7970 even had great DP performance, Titan X is a joke in that regard. Double standards everywhere FTW!
I guess it comes down to the list of priorities in your life. For me, having flagship $1000 GPUs in a pair isn't even in the top 10; so even though I can afford 4x Titan Xs, that's not going in my system (same with a $1000 5960X). I would rather buy $1,000 downhill skis and $1,000 IEM headphones because they will last 5-10 years. If for some people on this forum gaming is their #1 hobby, $2,000-4,000 on Titan Xs is reasonable and it makes perfect sense.
Damn, the Titan X PCB looks so similar to my old 680. Plain jane and unassuming. So do my 290's, but I guess the same can be said about any reference design. On a side note, love the plain nickel/acetal EK blocks. That hideous CSQ design they have now can die in a fire.
That PCB is fine for a reference design. The problem is NV is selling a $1K SKU but isn't allowing AIBs to make superior versions with much improved VRMs/MOSFETs/8-layer PCB and the superior after-market open air coolers. IMO, it's unacceptable that someone has to buy a Titan X and then proceed to drop $150 for a waterblock + $35 for a backplate to extract its full potential when MSI Lightning/Asus Matrix/EVGA Classified Titan X for $1200 could have accomplished the same + still offer far superior PCB/circuitry components and a BIOS unlock that would allow for 1.3-1.35V unlock. Knowing that NV is leaving the best for the future but is still charging $1K for a non-DP capable chip leaves a sour taste in many gamers mouths. I think NV should just market the Titan as the best of the best of that generation and for that reason Titan X should have Asus Matrix, EVGA Classified and MSI Lightning iterations!!