I love the option "Use an alternate measure for inflation"
The option is really just "Pay out less in benefits", except you play some math games to justify it![]()
yes awesome game! I played it, but cutting SS, military, bush tax cuts, medicare I got it to not only balance I think even can produce some surplus although program don't allow to go over the balancing line.
I'm not exactly sure if I understand you but SS already has the feature you describe. It doesn't save any money though because if you retire early and get less SS, you will simply live longer and collect SS for a longer period of time.Why is there never the suggestion to change from fix amounts of SS to lower rates at younger years that would increase as you get older.
This would reflect that some people will not be able to find work past a certain age and would still not fall into abject poverty but at the same time would be low enough to create an incentive to find work work.
Never seen the numbers for something like that.
Seems much better (and kinder) than just saying "raise retirement age to X"
It's so easy and painless to play this game. Anyone consider the real-world consequences of the various options?
