Time for a regime change

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,514
44
91
Gee, I haven't heard this tired refrain before. You're quite original and provocative by suggesting that it's our regime that needs changing and not good old Saddamy-poo's.
rolleye.gif


ZV
 

Konigin

Platinum Member
Jan 21, 2003
2,358
0
0
America needs the war. For both the economy and to re-establish our place as a powerful country. Maybe once we start feeling the pain of "real" war we will once again hold the traditional American values in more respect.
 

hagbard

Banned
Nov 30, 2000
2,775
0
0
Originally posted by: Konigin
America needs the war. For both the economy and to re-establish our place as a powerful country. Maybe once we start feeling the pain of "real" war we will once again hold the traditional American values in more respect.

One can hope :)
 

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
Originally posted by: Konigin
America needs the war. For both the economy and to re-establish our place as a powerful country. Maybe once we start feeling the pain of "real" war we will once again hold the traditional American values in more respect.


This whole post reeks.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Biased crap based on the idea that if a lot of people are against something, it must be stupid. What makes the European leaders any better judges of the situation than Bush? Oh, right, they support your opinion. So they must be wiser.
 

markuskidd

Senior member
Sep 2, 2002
360
0
0
You say "biased" like it's a pejorative, but according to you the whole world is biased. What's your point?
 

hagbard

Banned
Nov 30, 2000
2,775
0
0
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Biased crap based on the idea that if a lot of people are against something, it must be stupid. What makes the European leaders any better judges of the situation than Bush? Oh, right, they support your opinion. So they must be wiser.

You guys and your "bias". What cracks me up is what you see as "objective".

 

Grey

Platinum Member
Oct 14, 1999
2,737
2
81
I was kind of surprised to see you don't live in a certain California town Hagbard. Lame article anyway.

 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: hagbard
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Biased crap based on the idea that if a lot of people are against something, it must be stupid. What makes the European leaders any better judges of the situation than Bush? Oh, right, they support your opinion. So they must be wiser.

You guys and your "bias". What cracks me up is what you see as "objective".

And you are objective?
 

hagbard

Banned
Nov 30, 2000
2,775
0
0
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: hagbard
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Biased crap based on the idea that if a lot of people are against something, it must be stupid. What makes the European leaders any better judges of the situation than Bush? Oh, right, they support your opinion. So they must be wiser.

You guys and your "bias". What cracks me up is what you see as "objective".

And you are objective?

We've been down this road. No, I'm not. Neither are you.

 

markuskidd

Senior member
Sep 2, 2002
360
0
0
I'll jump right in and volunteer the answer that he's not. And guess what, you aren't either. And guess what, no one is. And guess what, that's why we're trying to point out how stupid it is to even bring the word "bias" into this thread. Because guess what -- it is.

edit: well it looks like i jumped in.... right behind hagbard :D
 

Grey

Platinum Member
Oct 14, 1999
2,737
2
81
Right sorry, editiorials.

ed·i·to·ri·al ( P ) Pronunciation Key (d-tôr-l, -tr-)
n.
An article in a publication expressing the opinion of its editors or publishers.
A commentary on television or radio expressing the opinion of the station or network.
 

markuskidd

Senior member
Sep 2, 2002
360
0
0
Originally posted by: Grey
Right sorry, editiorials.

ed·i·to·ri·al ( P ) Pronunciation Key (d-tôr-l, -tr-)
n.
An article in a publication expressing the opinion of its editors or publishers.
A commentary on television or radio expressing the opinion of the station or network.

Your point?
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: hagbard
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: hagbard
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Biased crap based on the idea that if a lot of people are against something, it must be stupid. What makes the European leaders any better judges of the situation than Bush? Oh, right, they support your opinion. So they must be wiser.

You guys and your "bias". What cracks me up is what you see as "objective".

And you are objective?

We've been down this road. No, I'm not. Neither are you.

I have yet see proof that Iraq has disarmed.
I have yet to see that Iraq is cooperating.
I have yet to see that Iraq is no longer a threat to its neighbors(yes we have oil interest).
We have proof that Iraq supports terrorists.
We know Senior al queda have been in Baghdad.
We know getting rid of Saddam with free a country.
We know Saddam has killed thousands(some reports put it close to a million)
We know the world is better place without Saddam.
....

I find my self quite objective, but I admit i would prefer to see Saddam out of power for a multitude of reasons.


 

markuskidd

Senior member
Sep 2, 2002
360
0
0
I have yet see proof that Iraq has disarmed.
I have yet to see that Iraq is cooperating.
I have yet to see that Iraq is no longer a threat to its neighbors(yes we have oil interest).
We have proof that Iraq supports terrorists.
We know Senior al queda have been in Baghdad.
We know getting rid of Saddam with free a country.
We know Saddam has killed thousands(some reports put it close to a million)
We know the world is better place without Saddam.

Conclusion: KILL KILL KILL
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: markuskidd
I have yet see proof that Iraq has disarmed.
I have yet to see that Iraq is cooperating.
I have yet to see that Iraq is no longer a threat to its neighbors(yes we have oil interest).
We have proof that Iraq supports terrorists.
We know Senior al queda have been in Baghdad.
We know getting rid of Saddam with free a country.
We know Saddam has killed thousands(some reports put it close to a million)
We know the world is better place without Saddam.

Conclusion: KILL KILL KILL

Or do nothing and continue to let Saddam KILL KILL KILL.

 

Grey

Platinum Member
Oct 14, 1999
2,737
2
81
Originally posted by: markuskidd
Originally posted by: Grey
Right sorry, editiorials.

ed·i·to·ri·al ( P ) Pronunciation Key (d-tôr-l, -tr-)
n.
An article in a publication expressing the opinion of its editors or publishers.
A commentary on television or radio expressing the opinion of the station or network.

Your point?

Did you read the thread? I would hope I don't have to draw conclusions for you. The links are all opinions against war, I can find an equal number of pro-war ones if you want.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
Originally posted by: hagbard
Originally posted by: ElFenix
how many threads can one person start a day?

How many have I started today? Let me see....one.

whats your per day average over the last... say... 2 months?
 

markuskidd

Senior member
Sep 2, 2002
360
0
0
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: markuskidd
I have yet see proof that Iraq has disarmed.
I have yet to see that Iraq is cooperating.
I have yet to see that Iraq is no longer a threat to its neighbors(yes we have oil interest).
We have proof that Iraq supports terrorists.
We know Senior al queda have been in Baghdad.
We know getting rid of Saddam with free a country.
We know Saddam has killed thousands(some reports put it close to a million)
We know the world is better place without Saddam.

Conclusion: KILL KILL KILL

Or do nothing and continue to let Saddam KILL KILL KILL.

Ironic, as your list does not list evidence of Saddam's excessive KILL-KILL-KILLing as something we have. The US has killed approximately 4,000 civilians this year in its military campaigns. Where does Saddam stand in relation to that?