- Oct 9, 1999
- 1,208
- 0
- 0
1) The republiKlans say that we cannot trust a hand count because of the possibility of fraud. What they DON'T say is that when they do a manual recount in Florida, there is a Republican and a Democrat standing behind each person counting the votes, watching every move they make!!!
Are they implying that their own monitors are so incompetant that they could not catch fraud happening right in front of them?
2) Their beloved candidate has campaigned on "States Rights" since he won the primaries. His attack dog lawyers went to FEDERAL court to try to overturn the recount process!!! Does this mean that Bush only believes in "states rights" only as long as the state does what Bush wants?
3) It is interesting how they keep pointing out that Gore chose democratic counties for the hand recounts, in essence saying that the people running the polls in Palm Beach, Broward, Dade and Volusia cannot be trusted...but they like to portray the Secretary of State (Staunch Republican and Bush supporter) as unbiased and following the law?????
Frankly, if I took anything you ba$tards did seriously, I would be insulted.
Are they implying that their own monitors are so incompetant that they could not catch fraud happening right in front of them?
2) Their beloved candidate has campaigned on "States Rights" since he won the primaries. His attack dog lawyers went to FEDERAL court to try to overturn the recount process!!! Does this mean that Bush only believes in "states rights" only as long as the state does what Bush wants?
3) It is interesting how they keep pointing out that Gore chose democratic counties for the hand recounts, in essence saying that the people running the polls in Palm Beach, Broward, Dade and Volusia cannot be trusted...but they like to portray the Secretary of State (Staunch Republican and Bush supporter) as unbiased and following the law?????
Frankly, if I took anything you ba$tards did seriously, I would be insulted.