• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Three design flaws (Female Edition)

Nograts

Platinum Member
I was thinking about girls like I often do with my time, and I've come up with three major design flaws that we should look into getting fixed.

#1 Lack of acceptance to being one of many mates to a male. Monogomy is a big thing for humans, which is cool if you are the male in reference to the female. But I want more than one female partner. I should be like a rooster and have many hens. Most women won't accept this though. Huge design flaw.

#2 Lack of spacial coordination and hand-eye coordination. Maybe evolution will fix this one day because the automobile is a somewhat new invention, but maybe this applied back in the day with horses and carriages. They are freaking dangerous behind the wheel.

#3 Lack of the ability to birth litters. Not normally or naturally at least. Viruses do it, rabbits do it, dogs do it, but humans don't. 9 months of gestation to birth a defenseless human who isn't even fully functional for another 10-14 years? Talk about inefficiency. They should be birthing a few dozen in eggs, and then those eggs should be fully mature and able to work for their father in less than a year. Totally a design flaw.

There are probably more, but these are probably the top three.
 
As I pointed out in your other thread you obviously don't have a beard and are therefore not an Alpha male (oh god here we go again). The problem with having lots/all the females is only the top males get to do this and all the other males get squat. You are one of the other males.
 
As I pointed out in your other thread you obviously don't have a beard and are therefore not an Alpha male (oh god here we go again). The problem with having lots/all the females is only the top males get to do this and all the other males get squat. You are one of the other males.

I have a beard that would make Leonidas feel like a bitch, I just can't rock it due to work. I also have women begging me to make them a real woman like 50 times a day, I just can't due to legal issues and taxes. I guess that's a flaw in the system, but my current only mate said she wouldn't appreciate that. Pfffffffffffffffft.
 
I see, it's the womans problem. I feel for you.

I'm thinking if I could somehow train my sperm to only impregnate the alpha female it might be more acceptable, then they could just fight amongst themselves about who gets to be the alpha female.
 
#2 Lack of spacial coordination and hand-eye coordination. Maybe evolution will fix this one day because the automobile is a somewhat new invention, but maybe this applied back in the day with horses and carriages. They are freaking dangerous behind the wheel.

Irony being of course girls start out with lower car insurance premiums because they statistically cause fewer accidents than their male counterparts.
 
Irony being of course girls start out with lower car insurance premiums because they statistically cause fewer accidents than their male counterparts.

Maybe they get in less crashes, granted, but maybe that's because men can get out of the way most of the time?
 
I feel like I've gotten just a little dumber every time I read one of this guy's posts. I need to be more selective.
 
I was thinking about girls like I often do with my time, and I've come up with three major design flaws that we should look into getting fixed.

#1 Lack of acceptance to being one of many mates to a male. Monogomy is a big thing for humans, which is cool if you are the male in reference to the female. But I want more than one female partner. I should be like a rooster and have many hens. Most women won't accept this though. Huge design flaw.

#2 Lack of spacial coordination and hand-eye coordination. Maybe evolution will fix this one day because the automobile is a somewhat new invention, but maybe this applied back in the day with horses and carriages. They are freaking dangerous behind the wheel.

#3 Lack of the ability to birth litters. Not normally or naturally at least. Viruses do it, rabbits do it, dogs do it, but humans don't. 9 months of gestation to birth a defenseless human who isn't even fully functional for another 10-14 years? Talk about inefficiency. They should be birthing a few dozen in eggs, and then those eggs should be fully mature and able to work for their father in less than a year. Totally a design flaw.

There are probably more, but these are probably the top three.
simpsonwalkinout.gif


You should quit while you're behind...
 
Your "hand-eye coordination theory is 100% wrong. A teacher in HS proved to us that in fact it's the opposite, he divided the class and had the boys and girls make paper airplanes, the same model divided up so every person performed one step, in every instance the girls outperformed in quantity and quality. He had done this "test" thousands of times and the girls won every time.
 
Your "hand-eye coordination theory is 100% wrong. A teacher in HS proved to us that in fact it's the opposite, he divided the class and had the boys and girls make paper airplanes, the same model divided up so every person performed one step, in every instance the girls outperformed in quantity and quality. He had done this "test" thousands of times and the girls won every time.

What kind of evidence is that? A true test would be running a mile, and then chucking a stone tipped spear 50 feet into the jugular of a tiger while leaping off a giant rock and gracefully landing a 10 foot drop. How many chicks could do that?
 
I have a beard that would make Leonidas feel like a bitch, I just can't rock it due to work. I also have women begging me to make them a real woman like 50 times a day, I just can't due to legal issues and taxes. I guess that's a flaw in the system, but my current only mate said she wouldn't appreciate that. Pfffffffffffffffft.

Code for OP walks down a street filled with hookers who ask him if he wants to have a good time. He can't, because he's afraid of a sting operation and his girlfriend finding out and dumping him.
 
I was thinking about girls like I often do with my time, and I've come up with three major design flaws that we should look into getting fixed.

#1 Lack of acceptance to being one of many mates to a male. Monogomy is a big thing for humans, which is cool if you are the male in reference to the female. But I want more than one female partner. I should be like a rooster and have many hens. Most women won't accept this though. Huge design flaw.

#2 Lack of spacial coordination and hand-eye coordination. Maybe evolution will fix this one day because the automobile is a somewhat new invention, but maybe this applied back in the day with horses and carriages. They are freaking dangerous behind the wheel.

#3 Lack of the ability to birth litters. Not normally or naturally at least. Viruses do it, rabbits do it, dogs do it, but humans don't. 9 months of gestation to birth a defenseless human who isn't even fully functional for another 10-14 years? Talk about inefficiency. They should be birthing a few dozen in eggs, and then those eggs should be fully mature and able to work for their father in less than a year. Totally a design flaw.

There are probably more, but these are probably the top three.

What are you? The preteen Walter Mitty?
 
Irony being of course girls start out with lower car insurance premiums because they statistically cause fewer accidents than their male counterparts.

That's not true. Women cause more accidents, but they are typically very minor fender-benders. When men cause accidents, we go big or go home.
 
The problem with having lots/all the females is only the top males get to do this and all the other males get squat. You are one of the other males.

Technically, there is a way around this problem. That's if you, as a male, are OK with "your" women (plural) also seeing other men (larger plural). This has another problem, though: it leads to a crazy-high rate of STD transmission.
 
Technically, there is a way around this problem. That's if you, as a male, are OK with "your" women (plural) also seeing other men (larger plural). This has another problem, though: it leads to a crazy-high rate of STD transmission.

I watched a documentary a few months back (I think it was about the supposed life of Lucy) and this other more-man ape came and conquered her but he killed her baby so he could start fresh with her.

It was pretty crazy.
 
Technically, there is a way around this problem. That's if you, as a male, are OK with "your" women (plural) also seeing other men (larger plural). This has another problem, though: it leads to a crazy-high rate of STD transmission.

Any man that went near any of my dozens of women would be swiftly seperated from their heart. So no there isn't a way round the problem, this is just beta male thinking.
 
Back
Top