Three 1080p 22" monitors or one 4k 28" monitor?

Battousai01

Member
Oct 15, 2002
173
1
81
Hi guys, need some advise on what is the best option: Get three 1080p 22" monitors or one 4k 28" monitor? I am thinking gaming would be much better for a 3-monitor setup but then I am thinking one 4k monitor is also a good choice. I mainly do Autocad and Sketchup renderings and play casual games. However, I also like to experience how it is to play FPS and racing games on a three monitor setup and also maybe having multiple monitor would be more productive at work than one monitor?

Thanks in advance for any replies! :)
 

fleshconsumed

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2002
6,483
2,352
136
No real advice here, it's a matter of personal preference I think. I only want to say that AFAIK all 28" 4K monitors are TN panels. Probably won't matter much for Autocad, but after having PVA/MVA/IPS monitors for the past 7 years I would never buy another TN monitor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: disappoint

Tweak155

Lifer
Sep 23, 2003
11,448
262
126
Productivity wise, I think 3 monitors is a better bet... I think ultimately your usable space will be near equal between each option (likely you'll need at least 125% scaling on the 4K), the logical separation of tasks 3 monitors provides I think would prove beneficial (especially if you use snapping).

Gaming wise, the 4K will likely be the better experience due to no bezel separation.

In either case, I hope you have a budget for a nice video card :)
 

Battousai01

Member
Oct 15, 2002
173
1
81
Thanks guys for the replies, I have just tried three 1080p and the gaming there is very immersive, I have a GTX 1070 graphics card. I might go for the single 4k screen but might consider buying one more monitor though if the budget allows.
 

mdram

Golden Member
Jan 2, 2014
1,512
208
106
i cant do autocad anymore on 1 monitor, must have 2
2 4k?
1k4 1 1080?

i game on 1 monitor and use the other for maps, seaching, ect
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,414
8,356
126
1 4k because 8,294,400 is better than 6,220,800

@mdram the solution is 2x4k. or maybe 5k. that's 14,7450,600. which is nice. not as many as 16,588,800, but definitely not peasant.
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,348
10,048
126
I would say, 38"-43" 4K UHD, and not a 28" 4K. Text is tiny enough on the 40" 4K UHD TVs I current have. (I use 100% scaling, no upscaling like some people prefer. In fact, I've used DSR/VSR to create a higher-than-UHD pseudo-resolution, and that's pretty good too. Basically, 5K on a 4K screen.)
 

Headfoot

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2008
4,444
641
126
I use 3 1080p monitors. I'd rather have a single 3440x1440 monitor instead because of how often I run into compatibility issues with 3x1080p.
 

obidamnkenobi

Golden Member
Sep 16, 2010
1,407
423
136
I use 3 1080p monitors. I'd rather have a single 3440x1440 monitor instead because of how often I run into compatibility issues with 3x1080p.
huh, what compatibility issues? You put an image on each screen, that's it..
I can't do work with single screen anymore. At least two. I'd suggest 2x 24" 1080p if you can. 22" is small