• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Thoughts or feelings toward this digital painting?

Naer

Naer

Diamond Member
2q18knq.jpg
 
Lobby art? Means nothing but colorful enough to take up space on a wall?

It's been a long time since I've messed with photoshop, painter, Wacom tablets, etc. my avatar is a digital pic I "painted"
 
I like it; reminds me of something though. Like artwork for an album or something.

Love me some modern/abstract art with vibrant colours.

KT
 
Although you have a focal point in the piece, I feel like there is too much distracting movement that prevents the eyes from being drawn to the focal point.
 
Looks like a peacock went Allahu Akbar. To be fair some paintings that look like that have gone for millions, so it's on par with stuff that some billionaires are into.
 
I see a black hole sucking in the moon, stars, nebula and the galaxies around it.

Am I doing it right?
 
Heidegger says that art exists not in and of itself but as something we engage in. As we think about the meaning of a work of art, the art exists as art, but once we feel we understand the meaning, the art is dead to us.

As such I enjoy art in terms of length of time. There are some Dali's that are still alive for me; and I go back to them in my mind. There are portraits by Raphael I still can't shake out of my head. Then there's Jackson Pollock, who I spent about 10 seconds watching do his work before I said 'fuck this guy and everything he does'.

This lasted as art for me for about 15 seconds; which is, as is said above, all you really need for 'lobby art'.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top