Originally posted by: Avalon
Socket A Sempron won't be any better than the XP line, so I wouldn't wait on it. It will have half the cache of a barton. If it's cheap, it will be a good buy, but I think the socket 754 Semprons are where the sweet spot will be.
Originally posted by: tamps
Originally posted by: Avalon
Socket A Sempron won't be any better than the XP line, so I wouldn't wait on it. It will have half the cache of a barton. If it's cheap, it will be a good buy, but I think the socket 754 Semprons are where the sweet spot will be.
dont spread such disinformation. sempron isn't all that bad compared to a64, 1/4 of the cache size doesnt have that much of an affect on regular apps like games or video editing.
rather go and check this out:
http://www.tweakers.net/nieuws/33100?t=1088594925&
and last but not least, you should compare the price/perf. ratio
The Duron wasn't all that bad.Originally posted by: woodscomp
Any processor that ends in the name of "ron" just plain sucks. Bet the Sempron will not change that.
Yeah but teh Celeron was.Originally posted by: MDE
The Duron wasn't all that bad.Originally posted by: woodscomp
Any processor that ends in the name of "ron" just plain sucks. Bet the Sempron will not change that.
Originally posted by: gwag
I just wondered peoples thoughts on socket a availability. Seem to be a lot of negative discussion about when I searched around.