- Jun 18, 2012
- 1,532
- 866
- 131
I have a question I'd like to throw out here and see what people think.
Most people will say there is no difference between killing someone yourself vs. hiring a hitman, and it's not hard to see why.
But, how much difference is there between killing someone, hiring a hitman, and voting for policies that will kill them? Thinking specifically of the AHCA here.
I am not going to name any names (you can probably imagine why...), but I had this discussion with someone else and was basically told "Screw you, they're not even close to comparable, and you're displaying "towering hubris" for even daring to suggest it."
So...input from more people would be appreciated. About the only difference I can see is the murder takes a few years rather than a few seconds.
Most people will say there is no difference between killing someone yourself vs. hiring a hitman, and it's not hard to see why.
But, how much difference is there between killing someone, hiring a hitman, and voting for policies that will kill them? Thinking specifically of the AHCA here.
I am not going to name any names (you can probably imagine why...), but I had this discussion with someone else and was basically told "Screw you, they're not even close to comparable, and you're displaying "towering hubris" for even daring to suggest it."
So...input from more people would be appreciated. About the only difference I can see is the murder takes a few years rather than a few seconds.