This needs explained

Howard

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
47,986
11
81
When describing the position of a valve, for instance, one might say that it's "fully closed", or "fully opened". But rather frequently I see that those two opposites are "fully closed" and "fully open".

Is the latter acceptable? If so, when and where? Otherwise, why the popularity?
 

Aharami

Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
21,205
165
106
hmm...both sound acceptable to me. Although, I'll probably say "fully opened"
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
The FO and FC times are extremely small. Most of the time valves are partially open. It's a true analog metric. This is why valves sound better than transistors. ;)

:D
 

roguerower

Diamond Member
Nov 18, 2004
4,563
0
76
All about tenses I suppose. If i'm on the job-site talking to my plumber/site utility contractor then I'm going to ask if the valve is fully open or open. I would say closed vs. fully closed though. It's either open, partially open, or closed.
 

xBiffx

Diamond Member
Aug 22, 2011
8,232
2
0
They are describing the state of the valve. The valved is open. The valve is closed.

When using the past tense you are not necessarily describing the state of the valve, but rather the last action taken on that valve. In this case, you are conveying the fact that you changed the state. The valve is opened. The valve is closed.
 

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,644
10
81
They are describing the state of the valve. The valved is open. The valve is closed.

When using the past tense you are not necessarily describing the state of the valve, but rather the last action taken on that valve. In this case, you are conveying the fact that you changed the state. The valve is opened. The valve is closed.
This is technically correct and realistically never used. :D
 

xBiffx

Diamond Member
Aug 22, 2011
8,232
2
0
Guess that only leaves my second answer then.

Edit: you cared whether a valve was open? Or you cared whether it was "open" vs. "opened?"

Yes, read my OP. One carries more meaning than the other in the situation I just talked about.
 

Markbnj

Elite Member <br>Moderator Emeritus
Moderator
Sep 16, 2005
15,682
14
81
www.markbetz.net
Yes, read my OP. One carries more meaning than the other in the situation I just talked about.

Ah, I was being flip, but now I see your point. "Open" I would think implies "fully opened." "Opened" would be less specific. However, between "fully open" and "fully opened" I cannot see any meaningful semantic distinction.
 

xBiffx

Diamond Member
Aug 22, 2011
8,232
2
0
Ah, I was being flip, but now I see your point. "Open" I would think implies "fully opened." "Opened" would be less specific. However, between "fully open" and "fully opened" I cannot see any meaningful semantic distinction.

Depends on the valve. All valves are not a digital device. They aren't just a 1 or 0, on or of, open[ed] or closed. Some are analog in that they can be opened or even open but that doesn't mean that its fully opened or open (same for closed).

Again, when I say the valve is fully opened I am conveying the message that not only is the valve now fully open but I also changed its state to be that way.
 
Last edited:

SagaLore

Elite Member
Dec 18, 2001
24,036
21
81
"This needs explained" needs to be explained. :colbert:

That is how I would have worded the title if not for my wife spending the last few years squashing what little Pennsylvanian dialect I still had in my speech.

Now I'm wondering if Howard is from PA.