This just In! Greyhound Beheader Not Guilty by way of Insanity

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: RapidSnail
Why do we put animals to death if they kill or maim a person (pitbulls and other dogs are prime examples), but the insanity plea allows human perpetrators to skip jail time?

...because they're insane.

So what good are they? They should be first on death row not the last. Least a sane guy has some chance of rehab..
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
70,642
13,821
126
www.anyf.ca
Wow shows our law system is just as screwed up as the US one. Only difference, in the US it would of took them 25 years to come to this conclusion.

Seriously though, the minute he was taken off that bus he should of been guilty on the spot and prosecuted on the spot. He MURDERED someone, and there are plenty of witnesses, end of story, guilty, none of this fluffing around BS. I don't get the law system sometimes. It's messed.

This guy probably wont last long on the streets anyway, then again he'll just become a serial killer since apparently murder is legal if you're insane. That will now be his new hobby.
 

BeauJangles

Lifer
Aug 26, 2001
13,941
1
0
Originally posted by: RedSquirrel
Wow shows our law system is just as screwed up as the US one. Only difference, in the US it would of took them 25 years to come to this conclusion.

Seriously though, the minute he was taken off that bus he should of been guilty on the spot and prosecuted on the spot. He MURDERED someone, and there are plenty of witnesses, end of story, guilty, none of this fluffing around BS. I don't get the law system sometimes. It's messed.

This guy probably wont last long on the streets anyway, then again he'll just become a serial killer since apparently murder is legal if you're insane. That will now be his new hobby.

Before you open your mouth, you might actually want to read what punishment this guy is facing. He isn't going back on the streets and he will likely never be back on the streets.

You also might want to consider the implications of locking him in prison and how dangerous that would be for him, the other prisoners, and the guards.

Or you can dispel all logic and reason and just be a vindictive SOB.

Like I said before:

Originally posted by: BeauJangles

Again, nobody is saying that this guy should go ANYWHERE except to a "facility" (read: prison) where he will receive treatment (read: medication that might make him less insane). If the treatment works 100% (read: highly unlikely), then he will be released (read: highly unlikely).

This man is being locked away from society and being given treatment for his illness.

Originally posted by: roid450
Originally posted by: dainthomas
Originally posted by: roid450
FUCK THAT. I believe in eye for an eye. We should have instant death penalty to murderers and people like him. It's complete bullshit to allow people like him to continue living :| :| :| :|

...says roid450.

Two :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

He should repay for the others life with his own. I never understood how the US can let people who have killed one or more people live in prison waiting for the day they are lethally injected or die of natural cause. If they'd just eliminate these sorts of people soon after the crime was committed, it would cost the state less money since they would have 1 less person to keep alive in prison :D

Capital Punishment FTW.

And what do you say to the hundreds of people who have either been put to death or are on death row whose convictions are overturned? Do you write now-dead innocent people's families a little letter saying, "I'm sorry we murdered your husband / wife / son / daughter / mother / father. We thought he was guilty. Our mistake."? How can a society be comfortable with putting people to death when we know the system is flawed and that innocent people are dying?
 

roid450

Senior member
Sep 4, 2008
858
0
0
Originally posted by: BeauJangles
Originally posted by: RedSquirrel
Wow shows our law system is just as screwed up as the US one. Only difference, in the US it would of took them 25 years to come to this conclusion.

Seriously though, the minute he was taken off that bus he should of been guilty on the spot and prosecuted on the spot. He MURDERED someone, and there are plenty of witnesses, end of story, guilty, none of this fluffing around BS. I don't get the law system sometimes. It's messed.

This guy probably wont last long on the streets anyway, then again he'll just become a serial killer since apparently murder is legal if you're insane. That will now be his new hobby.

Before you open your mouth, you might actually want to read what punishment this guy is facing. He isn't going back on the streets and he will likely never be back on the streets.

You also might want to consider the implications of locking him in prison and how dangerous that would be for him, the other prisoners, and the guards.

Or you can dispel all logic and reason and just be a vindictive SOB.

Like I said before:

Originally posted by: BeauJangles

Again, nobody is saying that this guy should go ANYWHERE except to a "facility" (read: prison) where he will receive treatment (read: medication that might make him less insane). If the treatment works 100% (read: highly unlikely), then he will be released (read: highly unlikely).

This man is being locked away from society and being given treatment for his illness.

Originally posted by: roid450
Originally posted by: dainthomas
Originally posted by: roid450
FUCK THAT. I believe in eye for an eye. We should have instant death penalty to murderers and people like him. It's complete bullshit to allow people like him to continue living :| :| :| :|

...says roid450.

Two :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

He should repay for the others life with his own. I never understood how the US can let people who have killed one or more people live in prison waiting for the day they are lethally injected or die of natural cause. If they'd just eliminate these sorts of people soon after the crime was committed, it would cost the state less money since they would have 1 less person to keep alive in prison :D

Capital Punishment FTW.

And what do you say to the hundreds of people who have either been put to death or are on death row whose convictions are overturned? Do you write now-dead innocent people's families a little letter saying, "I'm sorry we murdered your husband / wife / son / daughter / mother / father. We thought he was guilty. Our mistake."? How can a society be comfortable with putting people to death when we know the system is flawed and that innocent people are dying?

No worries ^^^ the Judicial system should start striving to better themselves so as to not have innocent people convicted ie. better investigations etc...

:thumbsup:

 

AreaCode707

Lifer
Sep 21, 2001
18,447
133
106
Originally posted by: Atomic Playboy
My understanding of "not guilty by way of insanity" means that instead of a definite prison sentence (ie. 20 years to life, possibility of parole in 15), he'll be committed to a mental institution for an indeterminate amount of time until he is deemed "sane," which will be never. So he's not "getting off," he's just going to spend the rest of his life in a cell with padded walls rather than concrete ones.

-EDIT- Didn't even read the article when I posted. I looked at it for 10 seconds and this is the first thing I saw:

"The public needs to know that when a person is found not criminally responsible, it does not automatically follow that a person will be released into the community," Scurfield said in his ruling "People who are found not criminally responsible but who continue to pose a danger to the community may be kept in a locked institution for the rest of their lives."

He's not getting off folks.

Excellent post. There is a very good reason we allow people to plead not guilty by reason of insanity. If you honestly cannot tell the difference between right and wrong you can only be held so accountable for your actions. I'd have to agree that, just by looking at what he did, he's pretty insane.
 

BeauJangles

Lifer
Aug 26, 2001
13,941
1
0
Originally posted by: roid450

No worries ^^^ the Judicial system should start striving to better themselves so as to not have innocent people convicted ie. better investigations etc...

:thumbsup:

And in the meantime people should just needless die because of others' blood lust?
 

roid450

Senior member
Sep 4, 2008
858
0
0
If someone is still waiting to be charged guilty for murder, let them live, but new comers... undergo better investigation and if the outcome is that they are guilty.. Capital Punishment :thumbsup:

If there's people currently in jail that have alreayd been found guilty, but waiting for their date of lethal injection etc... let's expedite that process :thumbsup:
 

Atheus

Diamond Member
Jun 7, 2005
7,313
2
0
got quite far through the thread before realizing this is not an actual greyhound dog...
 

ithec

Member
Feb 25, 2009
105
0
0
if he's not going to jail for murder, he's definitely going to an asylum so he can never breed...
 

RapidSnail

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2006
4,257
0
0
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: RapidSnail
Why do we put animals to death if they kill or maim a person (pitbulls and other dogs are prime examples), but the insanity plea allows human perpetrators to skip jail time?

yes, why do we not treat humans the way we treat animals? let us ponder

Don't be dense you fool.

The point is that animals don't have the same level of awareness as human beings, yet they are punished for things that most often are completely justified by their sense of instinct. They have no moral awareness. This man, who is considered medically insane, is arguably on the same level as an animal. To quote: "He did not appreciate the act he committed was morally wrong. He believed he was acting in self defence [sic] and that he had been commanded by God to do so."

Very few animals are capable of beheading other creatures and then storing body parts as souvenirs. Yet when an otherwise domesticated and harmless animal turns "crazy" because of some perceived threat, it is put down. The same animal is almost certainly less responsible morally for its actions than the man. So either give animals, who act almost exclusively on instinct, a chance at rehabilitation; or, if you're not going to do that, hold human beings, insane or not, at the same level of responsibility.

I eat animals, I know they "aren't the same." I also consider the fact that mental insanity is a genuine reason for such actions. But the way I see it, someone who does this should either be locked in a mental institution for life, or if freed, closely guarded or supervised; or locked in prison or put to death because of reasonable intent.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,165
10,626
126
Originally posted by: RedSquirrel
Wow shows our law system is just as screwed up as the US one. Only difference, in the US it would of took them 25 years to come to this conclusion.

Seriously though, the minute he was taken off that bus he should of been guilty on the spot and prosecuted on the spot. He MURDERED someone, and there are plenty of witnesses, end of story, guilty, none of this fluffing around BS. I don't get the law system sometimes. It's messed.

So if your car slips on the ice, and you run over a kid standing on the sidewalk, you should be removed from your car and shot, correct?
 

actuarial

Platinum Member
Jan 22, 2009
2,814
0
71
Justice was properly served here IMO. The interview with the Mother was telling in that she was not disappointed. She did say that they would be going to ensure he stayed in prison each year. Also the quote 'my Son died of a terrible illness but was never sick' was pretty cool IMO.

The dad was a tool though, talking about how we need to increase security on the bus to be sure this never happens again. There is no way you can protect against a crazy going head hunter on someone. Apparently the guy was mostly dead before anyone even realized it happened, so even in gun happy Texas no one would have shot him in time.
 

roid450

Senior member
Sep 4, 2008
858
0
0
Originally posted by: lxskllr
Originally posted by: RedSquirrel
Wow shows our law system is just as screwed up as the US one. Only difference, in the US it would of took them 25 years to come to this conclusion.

Seriously though, the minute he was taken off that bus he should of been guilty on the spot and prosecuted on the spot. He MURDERED someone, and there are plenty of witnesses, end of story, guilty, none of this fluffing around BS. I don't get the law system sometimes. It's messed.

So if your car slips on the ice, and you run over a kid standing on the sidewalk, you should be removed from your car and shot, correct?

That's different than killing a person with ur own hands or a gun with the intent of killing them. The car thing would be an accident. But what if you actually wanted to run the person over, thats a different story :p
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,165
10,626
126
Originally posted by: roid450
Originally posted by: lxskllr


So if your car slips on the ice, and you run over a kid standing on the sidewalk, you should be removed from your car and shot, correct?

That's different than killing a person with ur own hands or a gun with the intent of killing them. The car thing would be an accident. But what if you actually wanted to run the person over, thats a different story :p

It's not any different. That guy didn't have any control over his actions. God told him to kill that dude to protect himself from evil. That shit's *real* when you're schizophrenic. It's the same as if I came after you with a knife. That's a real threat that you have to deal with. There's no debate, or indecision. You take me out, or end up killed yourself. That's the same situation Li was in. Unfortunately, his reality isn't the same as the rest of ours.
 

PhaZe

Platinum Member
Dec 13, 1999
2,880
0
76
That guy at the end of the video looked like Alec Baldwin.

Haven't seen you post in a while jokersmoker, good to see you.
 

Whisper

Diamond Member
Feb 25, 2000
5,394
2
81
Originally posted by: RapidSnail
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: RapidSnail
Why do we put animals to death if they kill or maim a person (pitbulls and other dogs are prime examples), but the insanity plea allows human perpetrators to skip jail time?

yes, why do we not treat humans the way we treat animals? let us ponder

Don't be dense you fool.

The point is that animals don't have the same level of awareness as human beings, yet they are punished for things that most often are completely justified by their sense of instinct. They have no moral awareness. This man, who is considered medically insane, is arguably on the same level as an animal. To quote: "He did not appreciate the act he committed was morally wrong. He believed he was acting in self defence [sic] and that he had been commanded by God to do so."

Very few animals are capable of beheading other creatures and then storing body parts as souvenirs. Yet when an otherwise domesticated and harmless animal turns "crazy" because of some perceived threat, it is put down. The same animal is almost certainly less responsible morally for its actions than the man. So either give animals, who act almost exclusively on instinct, a chance at rehabilitation; or, if you're not going to do that, hold human beings, insane or not, at the same level of responsibility.

I eat animals, I know they "aren't the same." I also consider the fact that mental insanity is a genuine reason for such actions. But the way I see it, someone who does this should either be locked in a mental institution for life, or if freed, closely guarded or supervised; or locked in prison or put to death because of reasonable intent.

And that's exactly what's happened here. If (and that's a BIG if) this man is ever released from the facility in which he's held, he WILL be monitored. And at the smallest sign of relapse or non-adherence with whatever treatment regimen is prescribed, he will again be held in a state facility.

What needs to be understood is that many individuals with severe mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia) don't necessarily know or understand that anything is "wrong" with them. Their reality--while much different from the reality of most other individuals--is still a reality to them.

Just as you "know" the words going through your mind as you silently read this post to yourself are your own thoughts, so too do many individuals with psychosis "know" that those same words and thoughts are the products of someone or something outside of themselves. They have significant difficulty differentiating between their own thoughts and the thoughts, actions, and words of other people. It's a significant breakdown in an individual's ability to monitor reality, so to speak.
 

roid450

Senior member
Sep 4, 2008
858
0
0
"So you do or you don;t want any alcohol? either way, either way"

:p

"Mohammad is the most commonly used name on earth tard..."

:p
 

Colt45

Lifer
Apr 18, 2001
19,720
1
0
The psych center around here is double fenced with razor wire. It's not a hotel.

Corrections runs it, so AFAIK it's a prison with padded cells and some shrinks and doctors... I'm assuming he'll be going to the same type of place.
 

Krynj

Platinum Member
Jun 21, 2006
2,816
8
81
Why is pleading insanity a 'get out of jail free' card? He killed somebody. Why is he not in jail forever? What separates him from the rest of the ruthless killers in the world? A mental disorder? Who gives a shit. He cut a young man's head off, and yet, no jail sentence.

He doesn't deserve to live. End of story. Mental disability or not. If he's 'insane' enough to cut some guy's head off for feeling threatened, what the fuck can this guy possibly ever contribute to society?

Enough tip-toeing around human rights. The line has to be drawn eventually. Anybody that takes another life, for whatever reason, in whatever context, doesn't deserve special treatment because they're insane. They should be fucking killed. Talk about degradation of the human race.
 

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,548
1,128
126
Not guilty by reason if insanity isnt a get out of jail free card.

The person is in pretty much in a medical ward of a prison for the rest of their life.

People mistake not guilty by reason of instanity with not guilty by reason of temporary insanity.

The later is the one where people spend a fraction of the time in a mental institution then released. The former, they almost never get released.
 

Slimline

Golden Member
Jul 19, 2004
1,365
2
81
Originally posted by: Atomic Playboy
My understanding of "not guilty by way of insanity" means that instead of a definite prison sentence (ie. 20 years to life, possibility of parole in 15), he'll be committed to a mental institution for an indeterminate amount of time until he is deemed "sane," which will be never. So he's not "getting off," he's just going to spend the rest of his life in a cell with padded walls rather than concrete ones.

-EDIT- Didn't even read the article when I posted. I looked at it for 10 seconds and this is the first thing I saw:

"The public needs to know that when a person is found not criminally responsible, it does not automatically follow that a person will be released into the community," Scurfield said in his ruling "People who are found not criminally responsible but who continue to pose a danger to the community may be kept in a locked institution for the rest of their lives."

He's not getting off folks.

This is the correct answer. In Ontario it is something along the lines of 98% of those being not legally responsible for the crimes they commit for reason of insanity never leave the institution they enter.

 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: EMPshockwave82
"The public needs to know that when a person is found not criminally responsible, it does not automatically follow that a person will be released into the community," Scurfield said in his ruling "People who are found not criminally responsible but who continue to pose a danger to the community may be kept in a locked institution for the rest of their lives."
"Li, 40, will now be remanded to a secure psychiatric facility where he will receive treatment."

He's not going anywhere for a LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG time.

Didnt the chick in Tennessee who shot her husband in his sleep sit in a psych hospital for like 4 months? What justice. 4 months for killing somebody in their sleep.

I really dont care about the insanity defense. I find is a technicality created by the judicial system. What about people high on drugs or alcohol? They obviously cant comprehend their actions either and should be put into detox until they are deemed reahabed then let out into society again.
 

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,932
3
81
Originally posted by: BeauJangles


Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
whats the problem with executing insane people. I never understood that.

Why not extend that same logic to cripples and people with mental handicaps? :roll:

[

If cripples and mental handicaps are decapitating and eating people fuck em kill em too I don't care.