And how much did it retail for? all the trimmings was 60-70k. Imagine if put in stock market for term and bought a $12000 echo? talking about having 120K cash instead of 10K-6k you cant sell. Plus echo gets better mpg and has more room you enjoy for 10yrs.
cars are a liability not an asset best to minimize liability spending until you're really rich. Like set for life.
It says right there in the article. The car was a 2003 Kompressor. That car started under $26K. While still expensive for what you got, that was the cheapest Mercedes you could buy, hardly a luxury car you're trying to make it. And if you failed to read the rest of the article, that car was fully paid off before they even met. This is not the case of some dude being a show off taking a loan on a car he can hardly afford. The guy wanted a nicer car, and he got it because he could afford it. It was paid off. Ironically, the reason she had to use the Mercedes is because their or-so-reliable Honda broke.
Similarly, their house/mortgage was only 240K on a 120K combined income. That is only twice their income, well below 3x income guideline.
These guys did almost everything right. Their cars were paid off and they didn't buy too much of a house. Their only fault was not having more of emergency savings (however according to the article her husband was out of job for years, hardly anybody has several years of emergency savings stashed away). That and they were in the wrong place at the wrong time losing their jobs and having twins right on the eve of the crash.