• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

This is Uber's New Logo

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
here is a good logo.
hbosiliconvalleypiedpiperoldlogo

This is a good logo.

VS5Rt58.jpg
 
THe new one has no meaning, unless it's meant to depict some magic wand blowing the hide off a basketball.

The original was all collegiate but definitely related to the company.
 
Because that worked so well for Marissa Mayer who had significant input on Yahoo's new logo that looks as bland as a logo could possibly be.
So, what's Marissa Mayer's claim to Yahoo's success? Aside from building a nursery in her office, of course.
 
Still running with a 3 month driver turnover?

So, what's Marissa Mayer's claim to Yahoo's success? Aside from building a nursery in her office, of course.

To be fair, it didn't go bankrupt on her watch... that's something?
 
So, this is Uber's new logo:
*snip*

What do you think? It looks more like a tech company logo than a taxi service.

They ARE a tech firm and not a taxi service. The users are the people buying and selling ride services. That's the whole point. It's like eBay or Craigslist where they provide the match-making platform, payment, and feedback mechanism. They are a middleman transactional technology company.
 
They ARE a tech firm and not a taxi service. The users are the people buying and selling ride services. That's the whole point. It's like eBay or Craigslist where they provide the match-making platform, payment, and feedback mechanism. They are a middleman transactional technology company.

You sound like an Uber executive.
 
So, this is Uber's new logo:

12631481_10208750940596263_7482981605804527359_n.jpg



Maybe it's just me, but I think that Uber should actually HAVE a fleet of self driving cars before trying to make themselves look like a big shot tech firm.


Google wants to do this, but California, being the nanny state they are doesn't like it and of course wants to regulate self-driving cars.
 
Google wants to do this, but California, being the nanny state they are doesn't like it and of course wants to regulate self-driving cars.
Cal just wants people able to take over if necessary; the Google Car has a human driver not just because it has to by law, but also because it would have crashed many times if it wasn't saved by its human driver.
 
Well, the original logo was a 'U', kind of like the first letter in Uber. The new logo is a backwards 'c', with a square, kind of like nothing. So pretty great IMO.

they are going to be dead once autonomous vehicles hit the road.

Yeah they're megafucked in like 20-75 years why bother.
 
They ARE a tech firm and not a taxi service. The users are the people buying and selling ride services. That's the whole point. It's like eBay or Craigslist where they provide the match-making platform, payment, and feedback mechanism. They are a middleman transactional technology company.

Craigslist isn't trying to convince people that they have a 50 billion dollar company valuation, though 🙂
 
da fuq have they done?
New logo is D:

It would be awesome if D: was literally their new logo.

How fun is it to invent a technology platform that lets the poors whore themselves out to give rides to you and your tech startup bros for slave wages?
 
Google wants to do this, but California, being the nanny state they are doesn't like it and of course wants to regulate self-driving cars.

I assume you are OK with how today's cars are already regulated--so why is it specifically "nannying" to suggest that driver-less cars should be regulated...in whatever way you define regulation?
 
Still running with a 3 month driver turnover?



To be fair, it didn't go bankrupt on her watch... that's something?

I think that has nothing to do with her, but Alibaba's IPO, which was worked on since before she was born.
 
I assume you are OK with how today's cars are already regulated--so why is it specifically "nannying" to suggest that driver-less cars should be regulated...in whatever way you define regulation?


Why don't you send Google an E-mail or Fax and ask them why they don't approve of the regulations California wants to place on driverless cars?
 
Back
Top