This is amazing

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Are motorcycles highway compatible?
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
It's not really 300mpg, because that 300mpg includes draining the battery. By that logic, EV1 would have infinite mpg.
 

Epic Fail

Diamond Member
May 10, 2005
6,252
2
0
Originally posted by: senseamp
It's not really 300mpg, because that 300mpg includes draining the battery. By that logic, EV1 would have infinite mpg.

exactly, 300 mpg is only possible with a new mind blowing technology.
 

OUCaptain

Golden Member
Nov 21, 2007
1,522
0
0
What about the simple fact that it's ugly as sin. Imagine the comments as you pull up to the bar driving that.
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
Originally posted by: OUCaptain
What about the simple fact that it's ugly as sin. Imagine the comments as you pull up to the bar driving that.

How is it ugly? It looks like a small plane with wheels instead of wings.
 

Mutilator

Diamond Member
Aug 22, 2000
3,513
10
81
Hmm... 2.5 seats. Must be 2 normal seats but one of them is a wide-width seat for the larger population. ;)
 

marvdmartian

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2002
5,443
27
91
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Are motorcycles highway compatible?

I'd counter you with the fact that by their very nature, you can't compare this vehicle with a motorcycle. Motorcycles aren't required to have 5 or 10 mph bumpers, door beams, airbags, shoulder belts, crumple zones, or any of the other safety features that help to make a passenger vehicle so heavy, yet are required to make it "highway compatible".

I believe what the OP was asking is whether this thing would be capable of being put on the roads in the US, where strict safety requirements would require all of the things I listed above, if it's to be classified as a passenger vehicle. Otherwise, it'd be easy as pie for the automotive companies to meet the new CAFE 35mpg requirements that will be required, simply by building a vehicle that lacks any heavy components not required to make it move, thus sacrificing safety for fuel economy.

Let's face it, if motorcycles were required to have safety equipment, you wouldn't see any on the road, would you?