- Apr 10, 2001
- 48,775
- 3
- 81
http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2006/09/15#a2498
http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/14/the-...allard-microsoft-corporate-vice-presi/
specualtion from the Harvard blog:
This is incredibly perplexing.
http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/14/the-...allard-microsoft-corporate-vice-presi/
specualtion from the Harvard blog:
But let me throw one more possible rationale out there: because Microsoft's "Plays For Sure" WM DRM does not accomodate the Zune sharing feature (and that's just my speculation), they ditched it. In other words, WM DRM failed to accomodate new, emerging, and potentially unforeseen fair uses. The end result is that Microsoft decided to force customers to rebuy their preexisting WM DRMed collections in order to make use of Zune's novel features.
This is incredibly perplexing.