- Jan 2, 2006
- 10,455
- 35
- 91
Originally posted by: Quasmo
Originally posted by: fuzzybabybunny
Originally posted by: jpeyton
As an artist, I thought you would appreciate the fact that 24FPS gives the most "film-like" quality to HD video.Originally posted by: fuzzybabybunny
20fps? bleh
We need some 60fps HD camcorders.
I enjoy vibrant realism more than any kind of XYZ effect. The closer film can get to real life, the better. High resolution, high FPS, and vibrancy are what I'd consider good quality.
As a filmmaker, I feel that film looks 400x better than 30i. I hate hate hate 30i, it looks awfully fake. Film speed adds character. Maybe 48P would be appropriate.
For me it's all about fluidity. When I first saw the link in the OP, the first things that went through my mind were, in order:
1. Impressive resolution.
2. Don't like compression artifacts.
3. There's something wrong with the motion (as the boy's head turns).
4. Good colors.
5. What's wrong with the motion?
6. Check framerate. 20fps?
7. Close, open WMP (non-classic), replay
8. The motion is still not smooth.
9. Check framerate. 23.5fps?
10.