So much for the notion of doing DC with just "spare cycles" on an ordinary computer. Now you have to splash out for a dual 8-core SMP board, to make any headway in the standings, huh?
Yeah, a lot of people agree that the bigadv points system is unfairly balanced. But in terms of restricting bigadv to higher hardware requirements, that was the original intention. Bigadv was never meant for the likes of highly clocked Core i7 systems, or even really Skulltrail. It was for people who had access to dual or quad-CPU servers or HPC clusters, who would be given the priority for these units and would be given a bonus for their relatively rare hardware. Now, though, the whole thing has become a lesson in unintended consequences of incentives, with people building quad-G34 systems just for folding, because 48-core quad-Magny Cours machines provide so much more ppd/W and even ppd/$ than other systems can.
Of course, the bulk of folding is still contributed, I would say, by people with single-socket systems and GPUs. It's just that now, to be among the top tier of folders, or to significantly advance your team by yourself, you need an inordinate amount of hardware. But that's the way it's always been. I remember when uniprocessor was king, reading stories of admins borging hundreds of systems under their control to contribute points.
By the way, is anyone having problems seeing the last page on this thread?