- Dec 14, 2004
- 7,664
- 0
- 71
When I built this system a few months ago the only s939 cpu I could afford was the 3000+ Winchester. I've been allocating some funds towards upgrading the cpu and now have about $300 + whatever I can sell the 3000+ for to upgrade the cpu, so maybe $375-$425?
I do not overclock as I can't afford to wait for an RMA or even worse, the remote possibility the RMA would get denied due to overclocking.
I've been looking primarily at the 3700+ San Diego for its 1mb l2 cache, though admittedly I'm basing the assumption a bigger l2 cache would help not from experience with 1mb l2 caches, but from experience with 128kb & 256kb l2 cache cpus and how they compare with 512kb l2 caches.
I am not a big gamer, and my current rig runs the games I do play just fine for me. The only taxing things I do are number crunching with good sized data sets (with software that can be resource draining), and a lot of fairly extensive multitasking that involves audio encoding. Would an increase in l2 cache help with that? Or simply a faster cpu (ie. 3800+ Venice)?
Thanks for your advice!
I do not overclock as I can't afford to wait for an RMA or even worse, the remote possibility the RMA would get denied due to overclocking.
I've been looking primarily at the 3700+ San Diego for its 1mb l2 cache, though admittedly I'm basing the assumption a bigger l2 cache would help not from experience with 1mb l2 caches, but from experience with 128kb & 256kb l2 cache cpus and how they compare with 512kb l2 caches.
I am not a big gamer, and my current rig runs the games I do play just fine for me. The only taxing things I do are number crunching with good sized data sets (with software that can be resource draining), and a lot of fairly extensive multitasking that involves audio encoding. Would an increase in l2 cache help with that? Or simply a faster cpu (ie. 3800+ Venice)?
Thanks for your advice!