Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: alchemize
I would say that quoting a soldiers death to make political points is tanatamount to cheering for their deaths.
Well if you were grasping at straws to justify your support for Bushes deceit then I can see why you would think so
I would also say that wishing ill will on international support (i.e. the "Bush started it let him finish it") is even more tantamout to cheering on American deaths.
Again you fail to make a case for it, you just proclaim it and expect others to except it as fact.
Lastly, there are direct examples of people cheering deaths of Haliburton employees/subcontractors.
Anybody cheering the deaths of anybody is whacked (well except the deaths of the enemy combatants)
OK, Try this for #2. Allow me to present a theory.
a) With the added presence of additional international troops (especially Muslim), the more likely security would be established and less US soldiers would die.
b) With the added international assistance, reconstruction can acclerate, and less US soldiers would die, as they could be pulled out sooner.
Therefore, not wanting a or b to occur, means you are preferring the option of deaths of US troops.
How's that for a case?