I thought this wouldn't be as bad... but it really looks like it is. For once Intel comes out with a cheap and overclockable chip, then all of the sudden these old Intel myths regain their dominance in people's minds,
1. Intel chipsets guarrantee stability
2. Intel solutions have better compatbility
3. AMD cooling solutions are pricey and noisy
4. AthlonXP cannot be overclocked with stability
5. P4 is now a better value than AthlonXP
This is too good to pass up. A few months ago this would've been a beatdown by the Athlon supporters. Now I see one or two obscure advocates for AMD. Is this 1.6GHz Northwood really that good? Good enough to win everyone's hearts back? Good enough to totally overthrow AMD as a reasonable choice? This is getting way out of hand, how did this happen? I don't even think Insane3D, who is the very owner of this suddenly beloved Intel setup, agrees with those terms. I personally do not believe in statements 1 and 2, these are simply myths to me, and through my experience it's totally possible to have an AMD system with the same level of stability and compatiblity as Intel. Statements 3 and 4 just didn't sound right at all. You have to concern about the heat in the room when you go AMD, what is this some kind of joke? I have never had to concern about room temperature in relation to the heat dissipation, as long as you have a good heatsink with a decently powerful fan and you installed it correctly with thermal compound applied, there is no way how it couldn't stand the heat. XP can't be overclocked with stability?? I can't believe someone said that, it's not even funny anymore. So is the 1.6A really such a bargain it totally blows away any AMD offering in the same price range? At default speed, nothing will even come close to AMD, the 1.6A can dream about beating the 1800+ in any benchmark, a lot of people, and yes Im talking about even the people on this forum, are going to use their machines non-overclocked, and AMD makes a lot of sense for these people. A quick look at Overclockers.com's database, the typical overclock out for 1.6A falls in the range of 2.1-2.4GHz, if you're thinking guranteed 2.6GHz, then you're probably being a little bit optimistic. A 1800+ will do a decent 1.7-1.75GHz(~2100+) with a little voltage increase and no multiplier change or any insane cooling, and if a 2000+ can keep a 2.2GHz Northwood at bay, then an overclocked 1800+ shouldn't be too far off an overclocked 1.6A. To say that Intel is completely making AMD worthless is plain wrong, and you don't have to be a philosopher to see that. It's freaking amazing what this one CPU can do to people's heads, I think the ones who really need to wake up is you, not we.