Story on FOXNEWS.
Story:
Ok, as I understand it, the purpose of child pornography laws is to protect children from exploitation and abuse at the hands of others who create and "consume" such pornography, a worthwhile goal. How in the world does the prosecution of this girl for posting pictures of HERSELF do anything positive? I suppose it could dissuade other moronic teenage girls from posting pictures of themselves, but I fail to see how this prosecution protects this girl -- since the intent of the law is to protect children, most notably the children featured in the porn itself. Ruining her life because she exposed herself, and hurt nobody and nothing but her reputation, somehow is a good use of limited judicial resources and the criminal system?
If you want to send a "wake up call" to parents, publicize the case. I would venture a guess that the girl's parents probably don't want to see their daughter thrown into jail, unless she's a complete miscreant, and shouldn't it be the parent's responsibility to discipline their child when she's been stupid?
Does she create child pornography when she looks in a mirror?
Story:
N.J. Teen Accused of Child Porn for Posting Nude Photos of Self
Associated Press
Thursday, March 26, 2009
TRENTON, New Jersey ? 14-year-old New Jersey girl has been accused of child pornography for posting nearly 30 explicit nude pictures of herself on MySpace.com ? charges that could force her to register as a sex offender if convicted.
The case comes as prosecutors nationwide pursue child pornography cases resulting from kids sending nude photos to one another over cell phones and e-mail.
Legal experts, though, could not recall another case of a child pornography charge resulting from a teen's posting to a social networking site.
MySpace would not comment on the New Jersey investigation, but the company has a team that reviews its network for inappropriate images.
In the New Jersey case, the Passaic County Sheriff's Office investigated and discovered the girl had posted the "very explicit" photos of herself, sheriff's spokesman Bill Maer said Thursday.
"We consider this case a wake-up call to parents," Maer said. The girl posted the photos because "she wanted her boyfriend to see them," he said.
The teen, whose name has not been released because of her age, was charged with possession and distribution of child pornography. She was released to her mother's custody.
If convicted of the distribution charge, she would be forced to register with the state as a sex offender. She also could face up to 17 years in jail, though such a stiff sentence is unlikely.
Ok, as I understand it, the purpose of child pornography laws is to protect children from exploitation and abuse at the hands of others who create and "consume" such pornography, a worthwhile goal. How in the world does the prosecution of this girl for posting pictures of HERSELF do anything positive? I suppose it could dissuade other moronic teenage girls from posting pictures of themselves, but I fail to see how this prosecution protects this girl -- since the intent of the law is to protect children, most notably the children featured in the porn itself. Ruining her life because she exposed herself, and hurt nobody and nothing but her reputation, somehow is a good use of limited judicial resources and the criminal system?
If you want to send a "wake up call" to parents, publicize the case. I would venture a guess that the girl's parents probably don't want to see their daughter thrown into jail, unless she's a complete miscreant, and shouldn't it be the parent's responsibility to discipline their child when she's been stupid?
Does she create child pornography when she looks in a mirror?