pontifex
Lifer
- Dec 5, 2000
- 43,804
- 46
- 91
Originally posted by: theprodigalrebel
This should be a classic thread.
i thought all potty threads were going to be locked?
Originally posted by: theprodigalrebel
This should be a classic thread.
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: theprodigalrebel
This should be a classic thread.
i thought all potty threads were going to be locked?
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: Canai
Wouldn't the increased surface area of ~98.6º liquid cause the room to warm slightly?
*paging newton*![]()
Originally posted by: Canai
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: Canai
Wouldn't the increased surface area of ~98.6º liquid cause the room to warm slightly?
*paging newton*![]()
I'm dumb when it comes to this kind of stuff
So I don't really know what you mean heh.
Originally posted by: Canai
Wouldn't the increased surface area of ~98.6º liquid cause the room to warm slightly?
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Posting in an epic thread.... :thumbsup:
My dog pees all the damned time, but I'm not about to stick a thermometer up his ass to check his body temp.
Originally posted by: DLeRium
The driving force to pee coems from a free energy change in doing so. Clearly, peeing reduces the concentration of pee in the body, so the concentration gradient is from a high to low. This obey's Fick's laws of diffusion, which typically is in line with the free energy curves. If you draw a common tangent to this free energy curve, you can see the driving force.
Originally posted by: Canai
Wouldn't the increased surface area of ~98.6º liquid cause the room to warm slightly?
but the urine diffuses into the water and so you are not increasing any surface area.
Originally posted by: DLeRium
The driving force to pee coems from a free energy change in doing so. Clearly, peeing reduces the concentration of pee in the body, so the concentration gradient is from a high to low. This obey's Fick's laws of diffusion, which typically is in line with the free energy curves. If you draw a common tangent to this free energy curve, you can see the driving force.
Originally posted by: Canai
Wouldn't the increased surface area of ~98.6º liquid cause the room to warm slightly?
but the urine diffuses into the water and so you are not increasing any surface area.
Originally posted by: Canai
Originally posted by: DLeRium
The driving force to pee coems from a free energy change in doing so. Clearly, peeing reduces the concentration of pee in the body, so the concentration gradient is from a high to low. This obey's Fick's laws of diffusion, which typically is in line with the free energy curves. If you draw a common tangent to this free energy curve, you can see the driving force.
Originally posted by: Canai
Wouldn't the increased surface area of ~98.6º liquid cause the room to warm slightly?
but the urine diffuses into the water and so you are not increasing any surface area.
OK, I guess I could have worded it better.
You release a liquid that is higher than ambient temp, and this liquid will cool, causing surrounding air/water/whatever to heat. Your body will continue to heat itself, radiating heat.
So now, instead of just your body radiating heat, there is now a secondary source of heat in the room.
I think that makes sense.
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: Canai
Originally posted by: DLeRium
The driving force to pee coems from a free energy change in doing so. Clearly, peeing reduces the concentration of pee in the body, so the concentration gradient is from a high to low. This obey's Fick's laws of diffusion, which typically is in line with the free energy curves. If you draw a common tangent to this free energy curve, you can see the driving force.
Originally posted by: Canai
Wouldn't the increased surface area of ~98.6º liquid cause the room to warm slightly?
but the urine diffuses into the water and so you are not increasing any surface area.
OK, I guess I could have worded it better.
You release a liquid that is higher than ambient temp, and this liquid will cool, causing surrounding air/water/whatever to heat. Your body will continue to heat itself, radiating heat.
So now, instead of just your body radiating heat, there is now a secondary source of heat in the room.
I think that makes sense.
technically that heat was part of your body and was contributing to the ambient temp, so you aren't introducing free heat...you are jsut introducing heat that was already there, more quickly, no?
Originally posted by: bleuless
i never realized there are so many bathroom scientist on anandtech. who needs education when we can all just come on anandtech.
Originally posted by: Canai
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: Canai
Originally posted by: DLeRium
The driving force to pee coems from a free energy change in doing so. Clearly, peeing reduces the concentration of pee in the body, so the concentration gradient is from a high to low. This obey's Fick's laws of diffusion, which typically is in line with the free energy curves. If you draw a common tangent to this free energy curve, you can see the driving force.
Originally posted by: Canai
Wouldn't the increased surface area of ~98.6º liquid cause the room to warm slightly?
but the urine diffuses into the water and so you are not increasing any surface area.
OK, I guess I could have worded it better.
You release a liquid that is higher than ambient temp, and this liquid will cool, causing surrounding air/water/whatever to heat. Your body will continue to heat itself, radiating heat.
So now, instead of just your body radiating heat, there is now a secondary source of heat in the room.
I think that makes sense.
technically that heat was part of your body and was contributing to the ambient temp, so you aren't introducing free heat...you are jsut introducing heat that was already there, more quickly, no?
Right, but the heat from the liquid was unable to be dispersed into the room until it left your body. If your body doesn't cool and keeps radiating heat, then it seems to me that there is a second source of heat introduced into the room that was unable to radiate before.
Man this is getting confusing...
Originally posted by: edro
Removing a heated substance from any system should lower the system's overall energy...no?
The key is that the body can adapt and change it's output depending on requirements.
Originally posted by: edro
Removing a heated substance from any system should lower the system's overall energy...no?
Originally posted by: Canai
Originally posted by: edro
Removing a heated substance from any system should lower the system's overall energy...no?
But doesn't the body continuously maintain a certain level of energy?
Originally posted by:
Right, but the heat from the liquid was unable to be dispersed into the room until it left your body. If your body doesn't cool and keeps radiating heat, then it seems to me that there is a second source of heat introduced into the room that was unable to radiate before.
Man this is getting confusing...
Originally posted by: BrunoPuntzJones
Originally posted by:
Right, but the heat from the liquid was unable to be dispersed into the room until it left your body. If your body doesn't cool and keeps radiating heat, then it seems to me that there is a second source of heat introduced into the room that was unable to radiate before.
Man this is getting confusing...
This goes back to my car question.
If I pee in a jug while driving down the highway. I now have 2 objects that are 98.6F in the vehicle. If the A/C is blowing, it seems if I were to toss out the jug of pee and reduce the warm volume of the cabin, that it should faster no?
Edit: And I did really intend for it to be a serious thread. Well as possible as it could be![]()
Originally posted by: ArchCenturion
If you pee on yourself, it will remove heat, due to evaporative cooling.
