dank69
Lifer
- Oct 6, 2009
- 37,530
- 33,254
- 136
Don't be that person.This whole thing reeks to high heaven. I don't have enough data to judge yet but this smells like a false flag.
Don't be that person.This whole thing reeks to high heaven. I don't have enough data to judge yet but this smells like a false flag.
They collect data on all of us but they can't go through all that data for everyone. Once someone does something though, they can mine the data for anything they want to know. Believe me, if you ever committed an act like this, agents would be talking to every person you ever had contact with and watching archived video of every time you masturbated to internet porn in front of your webcam.
They collect data on all of us but they can't go through all that data for everyone. Once someone does something though, they can mine the data for anything they want to know. Believe me, if you ever committed an act like this, agents would be talking to every person you ever had contact with and watching archived video of every time you masturbated to internet porn in front of your webcam.
That's a very good point. Machine deep learning seems like a very useful tool for finding and matching terrorist-like activities. The question is, how many of us would be fine exposing our personal information to stop a handful of these sick killers?Maybe a person(s) cant go through all that data but dont think for a second that state of the art AI is not patterning this data up close to realtime.
Nail on the head. The real kicker here is this, if its an AI traversing data, is your privacy ever compromised? Per definition no, it is not. This is a loophole and I would be very surprised if it wasent exploited *widely* allready.That's a very good point. Machine deep learning seems like a very useful tool for finding and matching terrorist-like activities. The question is, how many of us would be fine exposing our personal information to stop a handful of these sick killers?
What are you? Some kind of prude?Even with that it seems a bit fast to have not already been watching these people. I also have tape over my web cam...![]()
What are you? Some kind of prude?
Just heard on NPR that one of the attackers was reported by some lady (she took pictures and everything) to the police and was even in a documentary called the jihadist next door praying next to an ISIS flag.
What good does monitoring everyone do when the police won't act on info staring them in the face? This is just an excuse to increase governments (not mind admittedly) reach, nothing more. It won't stop anything.
This whole thing reeks to high heaven. I don't have enough data to judge yet but this smells like a false flag.
Rescinding the cuts to the Police would be a much better option.
But that would require May to admit that she fucked that up so it's not going to happen.
Why did she have a position on cutting back on police? And with what is happening recently, it should give her a very good reason to reverse her position.
