• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

There were the 50's, 60's, 70's, 80's & 90'

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Joking aside. If 30'06 is pronounced 30 aught six, then what exactly does the ' stand for within the number 3006. Is it an extra zero? An extra 20?
 
Originally posted by: skace
Joking aside. If 30'06 is pronounced 30 aught six, then what exactly does the ' stand for within the number 3006. Is it an extra zero? An extra 20?

What 30-06 (the correct way of typing it out) means is that it is a .308" calibre round developed in 1906. The Aught 6 is a way of distinguishing it from other .308" calibre rounds.
 
Originally posted by: Aquaman
Proof 😛 You can't use the repost card without a link.

Cheers,
Aquaman
Welcome to 10 years ago, Aquaman. People have been talking about this subject since the late 1990s (well, also the 1890s, 1790s, 1690s, etc). While the search at Anandtech sucks, you can still find dozens of threads like this by searching.
 
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
I figure reporters will skate around it, referring to it as "this decade" or "since 2000". Once we hit the 10s, they'll refer to it as "last decade."

By the time we make it to the 20s, no one will care about the ten years between 2000 and 2009...

seriously nothing really happened anyway
 
Originally posted by: PowerMacG5
What 30-06 (the correct way of typing it out) means is that it is a .308" calibre round developed in 1906. The Aught 6 is a way of distinguishing it from other .308" calibre rounds.

Thanks 🙂
 
Aughts or naughts. One of the guys in the lab took a math course taught by a British professor and would refer to zero exclusively as naught. So the term may be more prevalent outside North America (with the exception of refering to subscript zeros). While I think (n)aughts would be the correct way to refer to the current decade, I do not think it is really going to permeate through society at large. It seems somewhat ackward to say.
 
Back
Top