• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

There is NO law that can prevent events like Va Tech from happening

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,757
46,535
136
Originally posted by: blackllotus
Maybe we should learn from the other first world countries. England and Wales combined have 8 times the population of New York City and 12 times less gun related deaths (and I doubt that they have 96 times more knife attacks). Australia, when confronted with a killing massacre years ago, enacted tougher gun laws and gun related deaths have dropped. Almost every other country with a reasonable GNP has a lower rate of gun related deaths than we do and have stricter gun laws.

Less strict gun laws make it easier for someone to walk into a building with an automatic and a large clip and down a bunch of people. To defend this in the name of liberty is absurd. A gun can kill a low of people in a short amount of time so the idea that other people with guns would be able to stop a shooter before he can do a lot of damage is ridiculosu.

IIRC, violent crime in almost every other category rose very sharply after the bans went into effect. Confiscation and prohibition is also totally impractical for the US (hell we can't even keep drugs or illegal immigrants out).
 

RightIsWrong

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2005
5,649
0
0
Originally posted by: Wheezer
The Bath School disaster is the name given to three bombings in Bath Township, Michigan, USA, on May 18, 1927, which killed 45 people and injured 58. Most of the victims were children in second to sixth grades attending the Bath Consolidated School. Their deaths constitute the deadliest act of mass murder in a school in U.S. history. The perpetrator was school board member Andrew Kehoe, who was upset by a property tax that had been levied to fund the construction of the school building. He blamed the additional tax for financial hardships which led to foreclosure proceedings against his farm. These events apparently provoked Kehoe to plan his attack.

On the morning of May 18, Kehoe first killed his wife and then set his farm buildings on fire. As fire fighters arrived at the farm, an explosion devastated the north wing of the school building, killing many of the people inside. Kehoe used a detonator to ignite dynamite and hundreds of pounds of pyrotol which he had secretly planted inside the school over the course of many months. As rescuers started gathering at the school, Kehoe drove up, stopped, and detonated a bomb inside his shrapnel-filled vehicle, killing himself and the school superintendent, and killing and injuring several others. During the rescue efforts, searchers discovered an additional 500 pounds (230 kg) of unexploded dynamite and pyrotol planted throughout the basement of the school's south wing.

We have yet to outlaw dynamite.

You do realize that buying dynamite today is so heavily regulated and controlled that you are making the opposite point of what you are intending?

Federal explosive regulations

Maybe I'm wrong....maybe you were arguing for tougher regulated laws and not a total ban? If so, you are making a pretty compelling point for stiffer rules.

Edit: Deleted possible inflammatory remark.
 

lozina

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
11,711
8
81
Originally posted by: blackllotus
Maybe we should learn from the other first world countries. England and Wales combined have 8 times the population of New York City and 12 times less gun related deaths (and I doubt that they have 96 times more knife attacks). Australia, when confronted with a killing massacre years ago, enacted tougher gun laws and gun related deaths have dropped. Almost every other country with a reasonable GNP has a lower rate of gun related deaths than we do and have stricter gun laws.

Less strict gun laws make it easier for someone to walk into a building with an automatic and a large clip and down a bunch of people. To defend this in the name of liberty is absurd. A gun can kill a low of people in a short amount of time so the idea that other people with guns would be able to stop a shooter before he can do a lot of damage is ridiculosu.

You are comparing apples to oranges. How can you make a direct comparison between the entire countries of England and Wales to New York? Do you not realize how many variables are at play here, which causes any comparison to be futile? And you failed to mention that since the UK enacted their tougher gun laws gun related crimes have increased.

Look, there are always going to be insane people and they will do insane things. You can't go around trying to ban everything they happen to use because they will just use something else or obtain the same item ilegally.. Instead of a gun maybe someone takes a propane tank and rigs it up to explode inside a crowded store. Then we going to ban propane? More people die from heart disease than guns so we should also ban cheeseburgers. It's just ridiculous.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
CCW anywhere and everywhere. One student with a concealed gun could've ended the whole thing.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
Originally posted by: maluckey
Soceity failed this guy, as did his parents, but we can't fix that. There are no laws to mandate being compassionate etc.

We could make a National ID database... Anyone found guilty of selling a gun to a foreign national (you woul be able to check versus the National Database) would be charged with commiting a felony act against the State. The max penalty for Treason/Espionage is death.

Even this is only a tool to enforce a law already in effect; this wouldn't stop itl, but it sure would keep the less-than-career-criminal more honest.

And why is that exactly? I am a foreign national living in the country and there is no reason why I shouldn't have access to gun.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,757
46,535
136
Originally posted by: halik
CCW anywhere and everywhere. One student with a concealed gun could've ended the whole thing.

Even though I think that would make sense, it would never pass.

Every time a CCW law comes up in a state the anti-gun lobby sends in their scaremongers to scream that the streets will run red with the blood of innocents. Of course this never actually happens when the laws are passed but that isn't covered by the news since it is a non-story.

Exceedingly few crimes are committed by CC permit holders and even less of those are gun related.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
Originally posted by: blackllotus
Maybe we should learn from the other first world countries. England and Wales combined have 8 times the population of New York City and 12 times less gun related deaths (and I doubt that they have 96 times more knife attacks). Australia, when confronted with a killing massacre years ago, enacted tougher gun laws and gun related deaths have dropped. Almost every other country with a reasonable GNP has a lower rate of gun related deaths than we do and have stricter gun laws.

Less strict gun laws make it easier for someone to walk into a building with an automatic and a large clip and down a bunch of people. To defend this in the name of liberty is absurd. A gun can kill a low of people in a short amount of time so the idea that other people with guns would be able to stop a shooter before he can do a lot of damage is ridiculosu.

The homicide rates remained unchanged in both of the countries (look it up on wikipedia), gun-related crimes decreased, assaults with deadly weapons increased... 0 net effect.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: chucky2
I get what you're saying and almost entirely agree....but man, it wasn't long ago I was in college (SIUC, former big party school), and let me tell you, having guns easily accessed by college students is not a good idea.

On the whole, college students are little better than high schoolers in reality, especially the Freshman and Sophmores. Maybe by Junior year, on the whole, you start getting some adult thought process (when it's not party time). Seniors are largely getting there, but still, not enough to trust.

What's probably going to come of this is more police on campus, moves to place video surveilance all over campus (including dorm hallways), and lawsuits. Hopefully greater access to counseling services will be provded also, to maybe reach folks like this dude.
I agree, giving college kids guns is not the answer.

But what about a professor that wants to have one in his car? (Ok the idea of liberal college professors packing is a joke, but there are a few conservatives out there.)
There is story of a teenager who went to his school with a gun and shot some people. The assistant principle ran to his car and got his gun out of the trunk and confronted the kid getting him to give up. Thus saving the lives of who knows how many people.
The notable thing about this is that the Asst Principle had to park off campus because the school was a 'gun free zone'

There has been a rash of drug store robberies in Orlando recently, at least 5 that I know of, perhaps placing a "robbery free zone' on the door will stop this from happening in the future?

Let's not turn this into another good gun/bad gun thread. Instead let's talk about sensible action instead of knee jerk response.

Let's not forget that times are changing. I'm a college kid. I'm also 35, ex-military, and a decade long career in security. You can't assume every freshman is 18 now. In fact, at my campus most students are over 25.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: chucky2
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Apparently one of his professors tried to get him into consoling, but nothing came of it.

This guy was long gone before the day he killed 32 people.

Well, nothing no matter how good will be 100%. This one guy killed 32 seemingly innocent people, just to kill them...which is unspeakably horrific.

But if we allow guns on campuses, what will the total yearly death rate by guns in college be then? I can't think it's going to be lower than 32, there's simply way to many crazies in college for me to believe that...

Chuck

Again this comment, with no support for it whatsoever. Please provide links that show people who carry guns legally shoot people illegally. All research shows people that carry do not experience these things, yet so many of you keep demanding that it would happen in this one instance. Why? Give us some kind of support for your position. I don't have accidents any other place I carry (which is everywhere), why is suddenly going to happen at school? Don't just say it will, prove to me that it will happen.
 

Mxylplyx

Diamond Member
Mar 21, 2007
4,197
101
106
There are a combination of things rotting our society, and leading to incidents like this. Parents are so busy trying to make money to keep up with the Jones's, that they outsource parenting to nannies and daycare centers. We have less parental involvement, combined with far more corruptive influences in our culture. We have better things to do than build large families, which used to be large enough to be a social network in itself that kids could turn to. Now, lonely kids are turning to the internet as an outlet, becoming more and more depressed all the while since the internet is no substitute for social involvement. We have become so enamored with our xbox's, fancy cars, filth riddled television, and other "feel good" stuff that we have forgotten what is truly important, which is family and fellowship. We like to think that we are better than middle eastern countries and such, merely because we have a higher GDP and bigger televisions, but I can often understand why their conservative, family oriented culture fears to death the so called "gift" we have to offer. Our "gift" causes traditional cultures that have existed for 1000's of years to rot from within within only a few generations.
 

Wheezer

Diamond Member
Nov 2, 1999
6,731
1
81
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Originally posted by: Wheezer
The Bath School disaster is the name given to three bombings in Bath Township, Michigan, USA, on May 18, 1927, which killed 45 people and injured 58. Most of the victims were children in second to sixth grades attending the Bath Consolidated School. Their deaths constitute the deadliest act of mass murder in a school in U.S. history. The perpetrator was school board member Andrew Kehoe, who was upset by a property tax that had been levied to fund the construction of the school building. He blamed the additional tax for financial hardships which led to foreclosure proceedings against his farm. These events apparently provoked Kehoe to plan his attack.

On the morning of May 18, Kehoe first killed his wife and then set his farm buildings on fire. As fire fighters arrived at the farm, an explosion devastated the north wing of the school building, killing many of the people inside. Kehoe used a detonator to ignite dynamite and hundreds of pounds of pyrotol which he had secretly planted inside the school over the course of many months. As rescuers started gathering at the school, Kehoe drove up, stopped, and detonated a bomb inside his shrapnel-filled vehicle, killing himself and the school superintendent, and killing and injuring several others. During the rescue efforts, searchers discovered an additional 500 pounds (230 kg) of unexploded dynamite and pyrotol planted throughout the basement of the school's south wing.

We have yet to outlaw dynamite.

You do realize that buying dynamite today is so heavily regulated and controlled that you are making the opposite point of what you are intending?

Federal explosive regulations

Maybe I'm wrong....maybe you were arguing for tougher regulated laws and not a total ban? If so, you are making a pretty compelling point for stiffer rules.

Edit: Deleted possible inflammatory remark.

regulation does not equal ban...or am I wrong????

we have gun regulation now, it is up to the individual what they do with it.

The main component of dynamite, Nitroglycerin is not that hard to come by if you know where to look. It has not been completely outlawed.

Neither has fertilizer. (remember Oklahoma)

Just because you have a license to purchase explosives does not make you a stable individual does it?

This knee jerk reaction people have to ban guns is ridiculous.

I have heard many say that this is the worst incident in history, it is not...it is the worst in recent memory yes, but not the worst ever.

 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
I think Hitler was a little worse.

In China they rounded up a bunch of people for practicing deep breathing and stretching exercises, put them in a prison and have been torturing them and selling their body parts for money.

In North Korea they have been rounding up political activists, putting them in prison camps and gassing them.

In Darfur, people are committing genocide.
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,975
141
106
Originally posted by: Termagant
Originally posted by: IGBT
...Here's something to consider: If the left feels more gun control would have stopped this, what about the notion that more prayer would have stopped this? Can you feel the left shuddering at the thought? Did the "Culture of Death" embraced by the left lead to this?

Do you really think you can force people to pray and love Jesus or whatever deity you think they should? In defense of gun control, at least guns are tangible things; prayer is so arbitrary and can be an entire act. A disgruntled anti-social potential killer would probably just go through the motions to appease society, the time he "wastes" in prayer and religious instruction just fueling his anger more.


.. the eco-theism of the left is being force fed to society under the ruse of voodoo science and bogus computer models supporting an arbitrary agenda. so it's already happening.
 

imported_Lothar

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2006
4,559
1
0
Originally posted by: Shivetya
Originally posted by: maluckey
Soceity failed this guy, as did his parents, but we can't fix that. There are no laws to mandate being compassionate etc.

We could make a National ID database... Anyone found guilty of selling a gun to a foreign national (you woul be able to check versus the National Database) would be charged with commiting a felony act against the State. The max penalty for Treason/Espionage is death.

Even this is only a tool to enforce a law already in effect; this wouldn't stop itl, but it sure would keep the less-than-career-criminal more honest.

Society didn't fail this guy, government failed the 32 victims of this guy. It failed because even when people who exhibit dangerous actions and writings there is nothing that can be done about them. Government continually fails society by allowing foreigners to come to this country, even those who exhibit mental problems, yet does nothing to investigate. I am all for foreign students, workers, and such, but if they exhibit signs of mental problems they should be required to be medically certified as safe or not, they are NOT citizens, yet.

Your suggestion is just as idiotic (if not even more idiotic) than "gun free zones"

A foreign student passes your mental litmus test, then 3 months after starting school his newly found girlfriend dumped him for another guy and he goes on a shooting spree.

What are you going to suggest next?
Have the FBI conduct mental tests on all foreigners every day of the week 24/7?
Ban all foreigners from the country?

You speak as if "mental problems" has everything to do with genetics and nothing to do with the environment.
Your suggestion won't solve anything and is just a waste of money.
 

marincounty

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2005
3,227
5
76
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: randym431
This drives me nutz and a lot of others too, no doubt. Face it, America is a very violent country. We love guns and killing. CNN loves to report news like this. It sells papers and TV time. As long as most any American is allowed to walk into a gun shop and buy military type weapons, the death will continue. Yes, we should be allowed to have guns used for game hunting and small hand guns for home protection. But why in Gods name people like the NRA and many politicians want to "protect" the right of someone to buy and own and posses high powered military type weapons in beyond the logic of the Heavens. Its nutz, crazy and as twisted as it can be. Sick and perverted in thinking we should have a "right" to this insanity.
I can?t figure it. Either people still think we live in the wild wild west, or they believe a Hitler-like army will invade us, marching down main street and leaving it up the the individual to protect the homeland. Who knows, its just insane crazy thinking. And until the laws are really changed, tune to CNN for the latest mass killings. And for Gods sake, don?t "act" surprised when it happens again and again (and again).
:roll:

The funny thing is that those "high powered military type weapons" were not the ones used to commit the crimes. In fact, very few firearms that could be described as such are used in gun related crimes at all. Overwhelmingly, small caliber handguns are used instead just as in the tragedy at VT.
All making guns illegal would do is to make millions of ordinary citizens defenseless and give criminals the upper hand.

The solution: ban all handguns
. Since the vast majority of murders are carried out with handguns-problem solved.
Note I am not in favor of banning rifles, shotguns or assault weapons. You never know when you will be attacked by a gang of drug fiends.
Handguns are meant for one purpose, killing other people (except target shooting).
They are easy to conceal and as we just saw very effective at killing people.
People carrying rifles that are up to no good are much easier to spot and aprehend.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
I agree with ProfJohn on this one.
 

spittledip

Diamond Member
Apr 23, 2005
4,480
1
81
Actually, in this case, there is a simple law that could have prevented or at least stalled this incident. Guns should not be sold to people who are mentally unstable. The killer was on psychiatric meds. He had psychiatric problems. If these records could be checked before the sellig of guns, then there would not have been an incident. Also, apparently most of the guns that are used to commit crimes in NYC are from VA b/c VA has the weakest regulations regarding the sale of guns. VA needs to fix their laws.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: spittledip
Actually, in this case, there is a simple law that could have prevented or at least stalled this incident. Guns should not be sold to people who are mentally unstable. The killer was on psychiatric meds. He had psychiatric problems. If these records could be checked before the sellig of guns, then there would not have been an incident. Also, apparently most of the guns that are used to commit crimes in NYC are from VA b/c VA has the weakest regulations regarding the sale of guns. VA needs to fix their laws.
That's a slippery slope. Medical records are sealed and held in confidence for a reason.

If we're opening those records to gun stores, they'll be opened to a host of other companies that have no business looking at them.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
I disagree. There is one law that could prevent events like this. People just don't want to look in the mirror and fix the real problem.
Ask yourself, what do Paducah, Springfield, Columbine, and VaTech all REALLY have in common? Answer: ostracized loners whose lives had been tormented by bullies until they finally snapped in murderous rage.
Sometimes when I look at these tragic events, and the arguments that follow, I wonder if the gun control crowd really isn't fighting for the right to continue being cruel to their fellow humans without the threat of physical retribution. We've become such an impolite society...

Now... I am not saying that the victims deserved what they got. They didn't. What I am saying is that, in the controversy that is the aftermath of these events, there is always the murmur of "What could WE have done to prevent this?" I look at that question as silly because WE didn't cause this. However, if we must have that question, that is what WE could have done to prevent this. WE could stop being such assholes to each other.

But no no never mind... sorry I spoke out of turn, didn't I? Surely we can't do that, can we? Be nice to each other? God forbid! Let's just take the easy road and pass some feel-good law, like banning guns or putting up more metal detectors or something like that.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Originally posted by: Vic
I disagree. There is one law that could prevent events like this. People just don't want to look in the mirror and fix the real problem.
Ask yourself, what do Paducah, Springfield, Columbine, and VaTech all REALLY have in common? Answer: ostracized loners whose lives had been tormented by bullies until they finally snapped in murderous rage.
Sometimes when I look at these tragic events, and the arguments that follow, I wonder if the gun control crowd really isn't fighting for the right to continue being cruel to their fellow humans without the threat of physical retribution. We've become such an impolite society...

Now... I am not saying that the victims deserved what they got. They didn't. What I am saying is that, in the controversy that is the aftermath of these events, there is always the murmur of "What could WE have done to prevent this?" I look at that question as silly because WE didn't cause this. However, if we must have that question, that is what WE could have done to prevent this. WE could stop being such assholes to each other.

But no no never mind... sorry I spoke out of turn, didn't I? Surely we can't do that, can we? Be nice to each other? God forbid! Let's just take the easy road and pass some feel-good law, like banning guns or putting up more metal detectors or something like that.
Great point Vic, let's outlaw bullies!!!!

And BTW the glock is the official gun of the NYPD.

If we out law ALL hand guns criminals will go to shot guns, if we outlaw shot guns they will get rifles etc.
In the end the only people with guns will be the people who are willing to break the law anyway.

It's illegal for a felon to have a gun, but how many are caught each year with guns?
 

randym431

Golden Member
Jun 4, 2003
1,270
1
0
All I can add is thank God for CNN, Youtube and the NRA, we should see a lot more of nut cases trying this in the near future. Man, I think its time to get HiDeff tv for the gore.

PS. Maybe these were not military guns used "this" time, but still, why one can buy and own so many guns, shopping for them like you buy socks at Walmart, is just crazy and insane.

Like Woody Allen said in one of his movies, the NRA is an organization that defends people to have guns to kill citizens. Its like a public service. (something like that)
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
There are plenty of laws that could have prevented this from happening. To think otherwise and do nothing is to make sure it will happen again. Whatever you think of gun control, there is no reason that a person who was evaluated by a psychiatrist to be a threat to himself should have been able to buy a gun. I can see if out of nowhere someone snapped and did this without warning, but there were plenty of warning signs and opportunities to prevent this if someone really cared to do it.
The mental health system in this country is a complete disgrace. It's almost impossible to institutionalize people who are a danger to themselves, unless they either agree to it, or declare that they are imminently going to kill someone, which most of them won't.
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,975
141
106
State police, meanwhile, revealed that in December 2005, Cho was declared "mentally ill and in need of hospitalization" and posed "an imminent danger," according to a temporary detention order issued by a Virginia district court.


..they new he was a danger but were paralized by politically correct social fog.