Originally posted by: KeithTalent
Retarded.
KT
Undoubtedly, many people will question Moot's worthiness of the title world's most influential person. TIME.com managing editor Josh Tyrangiel says that Moot is no less deserving than previous title-holders Nintendo video game designer Shigeru Miyamoto (2007) and Korean pop star Rain (2006). "I would remind anyone who doubts the results that this is an Internet poll. Doubting the results is kind of the point."
Originally posted by: KeithTalent
/b/tarded.
KT
Originally posted by: SirStev0
Originally posted by: KeithTalent
/b/tarded.
KT
fixed
Originally posted by: rh71
Internet fads that get into real life events is quite sad... we use them to make fun of stuff and that should be it. When you see rickrolling at the Macy's T'giving parade, that's just a WTF are you thinking moment. It's only starting now - can you not see how newer generations will walk around talking and writing l33t speak EVERYWHERE? So sad.
Moot denies knowing about any concerted plan by his followers to influence the poll, though TIME.com's technical team did detect and extinguish several attempts to hack the vote.
Originally posted by: KeithTalent
Retarded.
KT
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
I find it both funny and disturbing that a bunch of random people have so much control of internet culture. It's like anarchy that actually works.