lol, yet another brilliant, well thought out analogy.So just to be clear. When you look at the overwhelming black participation in the NBA, you guys see the same problem?
So just to be clear. When you look at the overwhelming black participation in the NBA, you guys see the same problem?
So just to be clear. When you look at the overwhelming black participation in the NBA, you guys see the same problem?
Uhmm, did you think this analogy through? The Democrats have no problem finding nonwhite interns, only the Republicans do.
And therefore...what? Is finding non-white interns a virtue? Simply by the fact that they're non-white?
So just to be clear. When you look at the overwhelming black participation in the NBA, you guys see the same problem?
Its a planet that thrives and survives... it is the only way it *can* work.This is an America that thrives and survives:
![]()
Hey knucklehead WH internships are gained mainly based on relationships not physical performance. You don't see me bitching about hockey or cricket either.So just to be clear. When you look at the overwhelming black participation in the NBA, you guys see the same problem?
How about having the interns that represent all of America not just the privileged few.And therefore...what? Is finding non-white interns a virtue? Simply by the fact that they're non-white?
Completely on point!!I would think that would be obvious, it points to severe problems in how Republicans are staffing their interns. They are either biased in their selection so that they don't choose almost any or their policies and behavior are so disliked by minority communities that they get almost no minority applicants. Either one shows a pretty huge problem. I personally think it is mostly the second, as like I linked earlier Republicans are quickly becoming the 'white party'. I guess that's what happens when you nominate unrepentant racists to be your standard bearer though, huh?
I mean why do you think Republicans ended up with basically all white interns? Did they just pull names out of a hat and get super, super unlucky? Haha.
So just to be clear. When you look at the overwhelming black participation in the NBA, you guys see the same problem?
But there isn't the same problem. For your analogy to hold up, the NBA would have to conduct a discrimination campaign against every non-black person outside of the league; sure, they'd let white players in, but you'd know that signing up to play was a tacit endorsement of that discrimination.
I would think that would be obvious, it points to severe problems in how Republicans are staffing their interns. They are either biased in their selection so that they don't choose almost any or their policies and behavior are so disliked by minority communities that they get almost no minority applicants. Either one shows a pretty huge problem.
I personally think it is mostly the second, as like I linked earlier Republicans are quickly becoming the 'white party'. I guess that's what happens when you nominate unrepentant racists to be your standard bearer though, huh?
I mean why do you think Republicans ended up with basically all white interns? Did they just pull names out of a hat and get super, super unlucky? Haha.
How about having the interns that represent all of America not just the privileged few.
But there isn't the same problem. For your analogy to hold up, the NBA would have to conduct a discrimination campaign against every non-black person outside of the league; sure, they'd let white players in, but you'd know that signing up to play was a tacit endorsement of that discrimination.
So you think Republicans deliberately tried to exclude black applicants?
Yes. Both in their choice of those who did apply, and in the actions that the party as a whole took that make minority applicants so rare.So you think Republicans deliberately tried to exclude black applicants?
You really didn't read did you?How do you know these people are privileged, to say nothing of few? Whites comprise around 70% of the American population.
Only if you think that there's something wrong with white applicants. Would you see a problem if they were all or predominantly black?
The irony in this statement is incredible.
Perhaps because, as the wapo link said, they picked from those who applied.
Uhmmm.... Republicans deliberately excluding nonwhite applicants and/or no nonwhites finding the Republican Party an acceptable choice for them is a pretty huge problem no matter what you think of white applicants. How on earth could you think otherwise? Serious question.
You're going to have to explain that to me, what irony do you see? I'm stating a simple fact which you can see from the chart I linked on the other page. The Republican Party has become more and more disproportionately white over the last 20 years.
So again, we're back to square one. If you think a political party's policies/culture are so repugnant to nonwhites that not a single one applied that's a pretty huge problem.
