Originally posted by: Electric Amish
See, but what I like IS better...at least to me. Most people ask for opinions about movies. I give mine, like everyone else does.
Well, it is one thing to say the following: "I don't like XYZ movie because it did A,B, and C incorrectly." Although it is a negative comment, it is backed with reasoning and gives some insight that someone may not have noticed.
It is another thing to say: "XYZ movie sucked". It is a negative comment that didn't add anything to the conversation. Albeit, it is usually easy to ignore comments like this as just 'the persons opinion'.
But this third comment is completely odd: "I refuse to patronize anything affiliated with Tom Hanks.Guaranteed to be crap." Not only is it a negative comment, but it screams of personal bias and unbacked opinion. The reviewer isn't going on the fact that they watched the movie and found flaws, they arn't even going on watching the movie. They are simply going on the fact that, one of the actors happens to be someone whose movies they havn't liked in the past. Comments like this are just plain ignorant.
Shrug, that is just how I see it. 90% of the time, I don't post when I hate something. There are many, MANY times where I've had a negative post all written out and then realized that it didn't really help the situation at all and I clicked back. This would almost be one of those times, except then you would never know