The Washington Post rips George Allen's campaign tactics in editorial

[Craig234]

Originally posted by: palehorse74

Originally posted by: Craig234

I didn't realize that I was an internationally-distributed news service. too cool!

I didn't realize you lacked basic reading skills, leading you to confuse being called excessively partisan with being called a news service. Too sad!

My point was that WE are allowed to be partisan while supposedly respectable news services are not. I also didn't realize that I should have used smaller words to spell that out for you...

You can't condescend from below. You just look silly, though I see you are not worried about that.

You confuse (you do that a lot) the fact that we disagree on your opinion that it's 'ok' for an individual to be excessively partisan, with your point being clear.

It was clear....ly wrong.

Wapp, I'm unsure what else there is to say on Webb and Allen; Allen seems to have problems with racism and dishonesty, and seems to be falling behind. Good.

 

[Genx87]

Originally posted by: Craig234

Washington Post writing an editorial against Allen?

Wake me when something worth discussing happens.

GenX axting as an apologist for the right, minimizing and ignoring their wrong? Palehorse doing the same?

And they say the Post is partisan.

Oh, did I pass judgement? I didnt see that in my post. But that is ok, you have a history of distorting the facts.

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: Craig234

Originally posted by: palehorse74

Originally posted by: Craig234

I didn't realize that I was an internationally-distributed news service. too cool!

I didn't realize you lacked basic reading skills, leading you to confuse being called excessively partisan with being called a news service. Too sad!

My point was that WE are allowed to be partisan while supposedly respectable news services are not. I also didn't realize that I should have used smaller words to spell that out for you...

You can't condescend from below. You just look silly, though I see you are not worried about that.

You confuse (you do that a lot) the fact that we disagree on your opinion that it's 'ok' for an individual to be excessively partisan, with your point being clear.

It was clear....ly wrong.

Do you work with/for Kerry? If not, you should.. that was some Grade-A Spinning right there. you almost confused me again with your amazing ability to say so much but make no point whatsoever! well done!

Do you disagree with the fact that the Post has a more important obligation to remain as unbiased as possible in order to deliver accurate news to the general public; as opposed to myself or anyone here on P&N who have no such obligation to anyone other than ourselves?

 

[Corn]

Originally posted by: palehorse74

Originally posted by: Craig234

I didn't realize that I was an internationally-distributed news service. too cool!

I didn't realize you lacked basic reading skills, leading you to confuse being called excessively partisan with being called a news service. Too sad!

My point was that WE are allowed to be partisan while supposedly respectable news services are not. I also didn't realize that I should have used smaller words to spell that out for you...

Never underestimate the stupidity of people calling you stupid.....

 

[Corn]

Originally posted by: Craig234

You confuse (you do that a lot) the fact that we disagree on your opinion that it's 'ok' for an individual to be excessively partisan, with your point being clear.

Dear god, I nearly sh1t my pants reading that! LOL if that isn't the definition of irony, bronzed to last the ages, I don't know what is!